emotion regulation Flashcards

(10 cards)

1
Q

What is emotion regulation?

A

“Processes by which indivs influence which emotions they have, when they have them and how they experience and express these emotions” Gross, 1998

Occurs when there is a discrepancy between current and desired emotions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are different emotion regulation strategies?

A

Intrapersonal strategies
- managing own emotions
- deep breathing / reappraisal

Interpersonal strategies
- managing and influencing the emotions of others
- motivational talks by coach, teammates’ encouragement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are theories of emotion regulation?

A

Process model of emotion regulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the process model of emotion regulation?

A

Can experience different things along the emotion regulation process

Involes situation selection, situation modification, attentional deployment, cognitive change, response modulation

situation selection -> actively approaching
Situation modification -> withdrawal / help-seeking
Attentional deployment -> seeking distraction / ignoring / rumination / positive refocusing
Appraisal -> catastrophising, cognitive reappraisal, refocus on planning
Response - expressive suppression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Evaluate evidence on links between emotion regulation and sport

A

Outside of sport - Paul et al., 2023 called it the strategy-situation fit. Found reappraisal used more frequently when being alone, suppression occured more among ‘non-close’ othersm and social sharing increased with closeness
More suppression linked to higher depressive symptoms when used in presence of close others, but using suppression when alone was linked to lower depressive symptoms

Emotion regulation flexibility was assessed in sport was assessed ‘kim and tamminen, 2022

Reappraisal is frequently considered adaptive for mental health (Webb et al., 2012). Including being a beneficial strategy for badminton players when attempting to control competitive anxiety (Stanger et al., 2018)

Troy et al., 2013 found that congitive reappraisal was postiviley associated with depressive symptoms if the stressors were controllable, suggesting that if the stress-inducing situation is modifiable, it may be more adaptive to attempt to actively modify the situation than to reappraise it

Lane et al., 2011 examined emotions and emotion regulation strategies used by 305 runners. 15% reported beliefs that strategies aimed at increasing anxiety and/or anger would help performance, and used strategies to increase the intensity of these emotions

85% reported beliefs that strategies that intended to reduce same emotions before competition would help performance
Found more likely to try to regulate an emotion if there is believed performance benefit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What research is there around emotion regulation and mental health in sport

A

Bird et al., 2021:
- Underpinned by PMER - different patterns of association of antecendent-focused versus response-focused
-Practitioners working with athlets could target those who habitually suppress and support them to reappraise effectively to improve their well-being

Found no relationship between ER strategies and depression. Athletes displayed ‘normal’ levels of depression. Strategies employed to promote well-being may not be effective at reducing depressive symptoms
no sport specific measures, research outside of sport context has found the relationships

Quan et al., (2025)
- investigated role of cognitive reappraisal in high risk sports
- Found that cognitive reappraisal negatively mediates the relationship between both state and trait anxiety and perceived stress
- athletes who use cognitive reappraisal are better able to manage their anxiety, leading to lower levels of perceived stress
no sport specific measures, research mainly outside of sport context, cross-sectional

Xin et al., 2024
- investigated relationship between coach-athelte attachment, emotion regulation and burnout
- athlets with secure attachment to coaches more likely to use cognitive appraisal - which helps them to see situations in a more positive light
- athletes with avoidant attachment to coaches were more likely to expressive suppression leading to accumulation of negative emotions and increasing risk of burnout -
- however, no measure of well-being, no sport specific measures used and no measure of wellbeing

aldao & nolen-hoeksema (2010) investigated relationship between emotion regulation and psychopathologies
- maladaptive strategies like rumination and suppression are more strongly associated with EDs than adpative strtegies like reappraisal and problem-solving
(no sport specific measures, research outside of sport context)

Loneliness
- Kim & Tamminen (2022) investigated the relationship between emotion regulation strategies and social and emotional loneliness in 448 youth Canadian athletes
○ Both associated with social loneliness, only suppression associated with emotional loneliness
○ Conducted recently after COVID-19 pandemic - importance of time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the effect of coaches on emotion regulation?

A

Santi et al., 2021 explored how COVID-19 lockdown affected coaches’ stress perception and emotion regulation strategies

Both male and female coaches reported higher stress levels compared to normative data
Coaches used more emotion regulation strategies than in prev studies
Gender: men used more suppression while women experienced more negative stress
No sig diff in competitive level

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Discuss how interpersonal emotion regulation strategies may be risk or protective factors for athlete mental health

A

E.g. motivational talks by coach, teammates’ encouragement
- creates supportive environment, reduced isolation, boost confidence, reduces anxiety
- however, dependency on others, stress if support is not as expected
- Frieson et al. (2012), Tamminen et al., (2021)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Discuss how intrapersonal emotion regulation strategies may be risk or protective factors for athlete mental health

A

Reappraisal has protective effect on loneliness burnout and results in positive wellbeing whereas suppression has been found to lead to risk of loneliness and burnout and reduces wellbeing (Kim and Tamminenm 2022; Xin et al., 2024; Bird et al., 2021 and Hu et al., 2014)

Reappraisal and problem solving are protective against eating disorders whereas suppression and rumination further risk of eating disorders (Aldao & Nolen-Hoeksema, 2010)

Reappraisal, problem solving and acceptance are protective against anxiety and depression, whereas suppression, rumination and avoidance further risk of anxiety and depression (Quan et al., 2025 (anxiety); Schafer et al., 2017 (both), Aldao & Nolen-Hoeksema, 2010, (both), Hu et al., 2014)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain how emotion regulation maps onto Bronfenbrenner’s PPCT model to understand athelte mental health?

A

Emotion regulation ties in with someones mental and emotional resources (person factor)

Can have adaptive - suggests that the emotion regulation strategy will have beneficial effects
Can be maladaptive - suggests that the strategy will have harmful effects
Can’t assume one size fits all so have to consider interactions between individual and their environment

May alter how an athlete expresses their emotions depending on their microsystem

Coaches own emotion regulation can be an important factor in the exosystem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly