Final Flashcards
(60 cards)
1
Q
Pure reasoning
A
Fallacy
2
Q
Kung tama statement ng opposition
A
Fallacy
3
Q
same term-different meaning
A
Equivocation
4
Q
Writing and Pronunciation
A
Equivocation
5
Q
Ex: All beverages in the
dessert will not melt
Ice cream is a dessert
Ice cream will not melt
A
Equivocation
6
Q
Ignorance of the law excuses no one
A
Ad Ignorantium
7
Q
“Ikaw Rin”
A
Tu Quoque
8
Q
Appeal to force-Force in exchange to agreement
A
Ad Baculum
9
Q
Misery, Heart
A
Ad Misericordiam
10
Q
Appeal to pity
A
Ad Misericordiam
11
Q
Ex: Business
A
Ad Misericordiam
12
Q
Attack to person
A
Ad Hominem
13
Q
(personal)
A
Ad Hominem
14
Q
Ex: Fliptop
A
Ad Hominem
15
Q
Appeal to people
A
Ad Populum
16
Q
Ex: Walang pasok
A
Ad populum
17
Q
Pilosopo
A
Begging the question
18
Q
Exaggeration
A
Strawman
19
Q
Ex: Relationship
A
Strawman
20
Q
Hasty Generalization: Universal
A
Straw and
21
Q
Cherry PIcking
A
H
22
Q
Diverting the topic
A
Red Herring
23
Q
False Dichotomy
A
H
24
Q
Tradition-
Misplaced authority-
A
H
25
2 faculties of man
Intellect
| Will
26
Intellect
Truth
| Falsity
27
Will
Good
| Bad
28
Truth to another truth
Reasoning
29
First truth:
Judgment
30
It has truth
Judgment
31
The ink of the marker is color red
Truth
32
The marker is red for the ink that produces is red
Truth
33
The marker is ted for the ink that produces on the whiteboard is black
Falsity
34
COMPARISON OF THE THREE
They're all divisions, They're all act of mind (Simple Apprehension, Judgment,
35
Reasoning in Tree of Phorophyrus
Highest qualification of man- called rational being
36
It is the highest form of being in rational
From general to specific
Man
37
Concrete product of deductive reasoning-
Categorical Syllogism
38
universal to particular
Where we derive to a conclusion by deducting it from two propositions
There's only three terms on each Syllogism
Composed of three propositions
1. First premise- more known : Major Premise
2. Second premise- less known : Minor Premise
3. Conclusion : Conclusion
Categorical Syllogism
39
Composed of three propositions
1. First premise
2. Second premise
3. Conclusion
40
First premise
Major premise
41
Second Premise
Minor premise
42
More known
First premise
43
Less known
Second premise
44
Ex:
All humans are mortals
Mr. Franco is Human
Therefore, Mr. Franco is mortal
1st and Second= Premise
Third= Conclusion
Universal A
Singular A
Singular A
45
3 types of Term
Middle
Minor
Major
46
S
Minor
47
P
Major
48
M
Middle
49
Both major and minor
Middle
50
(not seen in conclusion)
Middle
51
Subject of conclusion
Minor
52
(Predicate of conclusion)
Major
53
Eureka
Archimedes
54
Ergo
Cogito Ergo Sum- I think therefore I am (Latin) (Renee Decartes)
55
All human beings are mortal
Pedro is a human being
Ergo, Pedro is Mortal
Figure mood
Formula
MP
SM
SP
56
All philosophers are cerebral
But all philosophers are deep thinkers
Ergo, sone cerebrals are deep thinkers
If you have two postive premises, you can't have negative conclusion
+
+
+
If you have two negative premise, you can't have conclusion
-
-
x
Because you had nothing to define/prove.
57
9-6
Barbara Celarent Darii
Cesare Camestres Festoni Baroco
Dirapti Disamis Datisi
Bramantip Camenes Dimaris
58
All traitors are not loyal
But all traitors are selfish people
Ergo, some selfish people are not loyal
```
Minor term= selfish people
Major term= Loyal
Middle term= traitors
Figure= (Middle) 3rd
Mood of A= IAI (Disamis)
```
59
Some inconsiderate men are usurpers
But, all inconsiderate men are hard hearted
Ergo, some hard-hearted men are userers
Minor premises= 2.
= I (Quantity QUALITY of Conclusion)
= Universal (Quantity of Minor Premise)
= Inconsiderate men (Subject of the major premise)
=Ergo, all hard-hearted men are not usurers
60
Some poor people are kind persons
But, all kind persons are likeable individuals
Ergo, some likeable individuals are poor people
```
Middle term= Kind persons
Major term= poor people
Minor term= Likeable individuals
Figure= C
Copula of Conclusion= Are\+
```
