Improving Accuracy Of EWT Flashcards
(15 cards)
What three factors lower accuracy of EWT?
Anxiety, leading questions, post event discussion
What did Fisher (1987) study?
Studied techniques of Florida police when interviewing witnesses and identified factors needing improvement and was called the standard interview
What did the standard interview involve?
- witnesses given a large number of quick, direct and closed questions in a short time
- order of questions were not asked in a way that matches witnesses mental representation
- witnesses were not able to talk freely about their experience and frequently interrupted
What is the cognitive interview and who designed it?
- range of techniques that Fisher and Geiselman (1985) suggested police interviewers can use in order to improve accuracy of EWT
What four aspects were involved in cognitive interview?
- Context Reinstatement (CR)
- Report Everything (RE)
- Recall from a changed perspective (CP)
- Recall in reverse order (RO)
Context reinstatement?
- mentally returning to scene of crime, including the physical environment and emotional state.
- this is based on cue dependent forgetting
Report everything?
- all details, even if they seem irrelevant should be mentioned, triggering memories
Recall from a changed perspective?
- mentally recreate how crime would be recalled from other witnesses perspectives. ‘Holistic’ view of event to minimise bias and reduce schemas
Recall in reverse order?
- recall switched to different chronology (end to start, middle to start)
- this challenges expectations/schemas
What was the reason for the enhanced cognitive interview and who designed it?
- Fisher (1987)
- focused on building rapport and making the interviewee feel comfortable
Enhanced cognitive interview characteristics?
- no distractions to witness
- witness controls flow of information
- open ended questions
- reminded not to guess and use “Don’t know” option when necessary
- reduced anxiety in witness and get them to relax
AO3 Strength - Point
Empirical evidence suggesting CI improves EWT effectively
AO3 Strength - Evidence
Kohnken (1999) - 55 study meta-analysis, CI provided 34% increase in correct info than standard interview used by police
AO3 Limitation - Point
Contradictory research
AO3 Limitation - evidence
Kohnken (1999) - 81% increase of correct information but also 61% increase of incorrect information where the enhanced CI was used over the standard interview