lecture 6 Flashcards
(15 cards)
non-experimental research
goal of psychology: describing/” explaining” behavior
- in what ways does X affect Y (and Z)
- between pre-existing groups
- following an intervention
- developmental research
Quasi-experimental research
- goal of psychology: cause and effect relationships
- less control than true experiments, but more than non-experimental research
validity in research design
-internal and external validity: did you meet the goal of your experiment, can you count on your results, which is most important
internal validity
-a change in one variable (the IV) is the only explanations for a change in the other variable (the DV)
treats to internal validity
- extraneous variables: any variable (not of interest) within a research design that could impact the results ex) study ability
- confounding variables: an extraneous variable that varies systematically (ie. At the same time) with the variable of interest ex) study time
- demand characteristics: how your participants are acting
- expectancy effects/ experimenter bias: experimenter acting differently
other threats to internal validity (MRS SMITH)
M- Maturation R-Regression to the mean S- Selection of subjects S- Selection X maturation interaction M- Mortality I- Instrumentation T-Testing H-history -all cofounding variables
maturation
- physiological processes occurring within the participants that could account for any changes in their behavior
ex) growing up - grades are changing because they’re growing up and becoming better students
regression to the mean
participants who receive extreme scores when tested tend to have less extreme scores on subsequent retesting
ex) your first year/first term GPA- they were already doing bad already
selection of subjects
- any bias in selecting and assigning participants to groups that results in systematic differences between the participants to each group
- who was the experimental group? Tutor seeking group
- who was the control group? Hand picked by teacher group
selection by maturation interaction
- the two groups, although similar at one point, would have grown apart (developed differently) even with no treatment
- experimental group has a much more likely chance of maturation
mortality
- differential dropping out of some subjects from the comparison groups before the experiments is finished
ex) students who were doing bad, dropping out (GPA going up due to it)
instrumentation
changes in the measurement procedures may result in differences between the comparison groups that are confused with the treatment effects
testing
-when participants are repeatedly tested, changes in test scores may be more due to practice or knowledge about the test procedure gained from earlier experiences rather than any treatment effects
history
- extraneous events occurring during the course of the experiment that may affect the participants responses on the dependant measure
ex) drinking age changes that year, making the students change less
external validity
-can we generalize the results of other contexts?
external validity- other people
-population validity: selection bias: WEIRD
external validity- other contexts
-ecological validity : other experiments
-operational definitions
-measurement choices
-experimenter characteristics
- contrived situations :real world
- unrealistic responses