Lecture 9- Variable Associations, Causation and the role of Change Flashcards

(34 cards)

1
Q

Koch’s Postulates

A

Demonstrated association between a microorganism and a disease

  1. Organism must be observed in every case of disease
  2. Must be isolated and grown in pure culture
  3. Pure culture must, when inoculated into a susceptible animal, reproduce the disease
  4. Organism must be observed in, and recovered from, the experimental animal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Richard Doll and Bradford Hill discovered what

A

Found strong associations between smoking and lung cancer deaths

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Hills criteria for causation

A
  1. Strength
  2. Consistency
  3. Specificity
  4. Temporality
  5. Biological gradient
  6. Plausibility
  7. Coherence
  8. Experiment
  9. Analogy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Hill’s strength for causation

A

Strong associations give support to causal relationship between factor and disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Hill’s consistency for causation

A

An association has been observed repeatedly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Hill’s specificity for causation

A

Association is constrained to a particular disease-exposure relationship, specific cause leads to specific effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Hill’s temporality for causation

A

The cause/exposure must be observed before the effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Hill’s biological gradient for causation

A

Also known as dose response; shows a linear trend in the association between exposure and disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Hill’s plausibility for causation

A

The association must be biologically plausible form the standpoint of contemporary biological knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Hill’s coherence for causation

A

The cause and effect interpretation of our data should not seriously conflict with the generally known facts of the natural history and biology of the disease

Ex: histopathologic effects of smoking on bronchial epithelium

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Hill’s experiment for causation

A

Preventative actions alter the frequency of the outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Hill’s analogy of causation

A

Should be similarities between known associations and one that is being evaluated for causality

Ex: persons exposed to secondhand smoke should also have increase in lung cancer risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Multi factorial causality

A

Many types of causal relationships involve diseases with more than one causal factor

Ex: specific exposures, family history, lifestyle characteristics, environmental influences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the two models of multifactorial causality

A

Epidemiological triangle and web of causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Epidemiological triangle

A

Includes 3 major factors- host, agent, environment

Affected by influences such as time, transmission type, and vectors/fomites

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the 4 illustrations of association

A

Scatter plots, dose response curve, epidemic curve, contingency table

17
Q

Scatter plot diagram

A

Closer to the points lie with respect to the straight line of best fit the stronger the association between variable X and Y

18
Q

Dose response curve

A

Type of correlative association between an exposure and an effect

Threshold refers to the lowest dose at which a particular response occurs

19
Q

Epidemic curve

A

Plotting of distribution of case by time of onset, aids in identifying the cause of disease outbreak

20
Q

2x2 contingency table

A

True positive, false positive, true negative, false negative

22
Q

What are 3 major challenges to validity of study designs

A
  1. Internal validity vs external validity
  2. Error
  3. Bias
23
Q

Internal validity

A

Degree to which a study has used methodological sound procedures

24
Q

External validity

A

Ones ability to generalize the results of the study

25
Error
Difference between the value obtained and true value for population Two general categories: sampling error, non-sampling error
26
Sampling error
Variation that occurs because we are studying a sample rather than an entire population. There will always be natural variation between the different sample that are selected
27
What are 4 ways to express sampling error
Confidence intervals, standard error, margin of error, coefficient of variance
28
Non-sampling
Term for errors that are a result of factors other than using a sample, these result in bias
29
What are 4 common types of bias
Recall bias, selection bias, observer bias, confounding
30
Is bias more prevalent in descriptive or analytic studies
More prevalent in analytic studies
31
How to control recall bias
Aware of limitation when selected study method
32
How to control observer bias
Blind or double blind procedures, script, multiple observers
33
How to control selection bias
Randomization
34
How to control confounding bias
Design phase: think through potential confounders, analysis phase: some types of analysis can control for confounders