Non-Experimental Research Methods Flashcards

1
Q

Define ‘naturalistic observation’

A

Observation of behaviour in a natural situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define ‘controlled observation’

A

An observation where some of the variables are controlled by the researcher, reducing the natural-ness. These are usually conducted in a lab.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Identify the strengths and weakness of naturalistic observation

A

Pros:

  • No Demand Characteristics
  • High Ecological Validity

Cons:

  • Difficult to replicate
  • Observer’s presence may affect behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the difference between structured and unstructured observation?

A

Unstructured; the researcher records all relevant behaviour but has no ‘system’. Usually when behaviour to be studied is unpredictable

Structured; the researcher uses various systems:

  • Research aims (an area to study)
  • Observational systems (how to record the behaviour)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define ‘operationalisation’

A

Breaking the behaviour being studied into a set of measurable components

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define ‘continuous’ observation’

A

Where every instance of behaviour you see is recorded in detail

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define ‘event sampling’ and state on strength and weakness

A

Recording each time an event occurs

Pro:
Con: May be difficult to record everything accurately

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define ‘time sampling’ and state on strength and weakness

A

Recording behaviour is regular time intervals
(e.g. every other minute)

Pro:
Con: Some behaviours may be missed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the difference between participant and non-participant observation?

A

Participant; when the observer is involved in the research

Non-Participant; when the observer is not involved in the research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

State the adavanages and disadvantages of Participant Observation

A

Pros:

  • Living the experience
  • Avoids researcher bias

Cons:

  • Difficult to record
  • Time consuming
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

State the adavanages and disadvantages of Non-Participant Observation

A

Pros:

  • Easy to record
  • Observer doesn’t interfere

Cons:
-Demand Characterisics (potentially)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define ‘covert observation’

A

When participants are unaware of the observer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define ‘overt observation’

A

When participants are aware of the observer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

State the adavantages and disadvantages of Covert Observation

A

Pros: Allows observer to witness behaviour which might otherwise not be seen
Cons: No participant consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

State the adavantages and disadvantages of Overt Observation

A

Pros: Participant’s consent
Cons: Demand Characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What kind of data does an unstructured observation produce?

A

Qualitiative Data

17
Q

What kind of data does a structured observation produce?

A

Quantitative Data

18
Q

How do observers assure that their research is reliable?

A
  • Observation’s results should be consistent

- Inter-observer reliability; correlating the observations of two or more observers

19
Q

How do observers deal with low reliability within research?

A

Observers should be trained to use a behaviour checklist or coding system

20
Q

Define the ‘self-report technique’

A

A research method where participants give information about themselves without researcher interference

Usually in the form of questionnnaires or interviews

21
Q

Outline the strengths of using a questionnaire as a form of self-report

A
  • Easy to collect information from the masses

- No interviewer effects

22
Q

Outline the weaknesses of using a questionnaire as a form of self-report

A
  • Social Desirability Bias; not answering honestly

- Questions may be misunderstood

23
Q

Define what is meant by ‘a structured interview’

A

Contains pre-prepared questions (pretty much a face-to-face questionnaire)

24
Q

Define what is meant by ‘a semi-structured interview’

A

Consists of some prepared questions but allows for the interviewee to elaborate (most successful form of interview)

25
Define what is meant by 'a unstructured interview'
Consists of possibly one or two pre-prepared questions to start, but continues based on the responses of the interviewee
26
Outline the advantages of using an interview as a form of self-report compared to a questionnaire
- Body language can be recorded | - In unstructured interviews, the questions are specific and the interviewee is given an opportunity to expand
27
Outline the disadvantages of using an interview as a form of self-report compared to a questionnaire
- Interviewer effects | - Some people may struggle verbalising their thoughts
28
Outline the advantages and disadvantages of using a structured interview interview
Pros: - Easily repeated - Easier to analyse Cons: -Rigid and inflexible
29
Outline the advantages and disadvantages of using a unstructured or semi-structured interview
Pros: -Fairly flexible Cons: - Interviewer bias - Answers are less easy to analyse as they are unpredictable
30
What is the difference between a correlation and an experiment?
Correlation; seeks to establish the nature between two variables Experiment; the difference between conditions and established cause and effect
31
Define 'correlation coefficient'
a number between -1 and +1 which tells you the strength of a correlation
32
Identify advantages of investigations using correlational analysis
- Used when an experiment would be unethical | - Can stimulate further investigation
33
Identify advantages of investigations using correlational analysis
- Cause and affect cannot be established | - only appropriate for measuring linear relationships
34
Define 'meta-analysis'
A statistical technique for combining the findings of several studies of research in a certain area
35
Evaluate meta-analysis
Pros: - Allows for indentification of trends and relationships that wouldn't be possible in smaller studies - Helpful to illustrate all results of an area, especially when specific results are weak or contradictory Cons: -Research designs differ, meaning they may not be trulty comparable
36
What are the four options for reviewers to give when peer-reviewing a study?
1. Accept the work unconditionally 2. Accept it as long as it is improved 3. Reject it, but suggest improvement 4. Reject it outright
37
What is a 'single-blind, double blind and open' review?
Single-Blind; the names of the reviewers are not revealed to the researcher Double-Blind; both reviewer and researcher are anomanous Open; when the reviewer and researcher are known to eachother