p1 pyq from 86 - sociocultural Flashcards
(278 cards)
‘William Ogburn and Cultural lag. 10M—2023
William Ogburn’s concept of cultural lag describes the period of adjustment when non-material culture (values, beliefs, and norms) struggles to adapt to new material conditions (technology, inventions). Ogburn argued that technological advancements occur faster than societal norms and laws, leading to a lag. This lag can cause social problems and conflicts as society adjusts. For example, the rapid development of digital technology has outpaced legal and ethical frameworks, resulting in issues like data privacy concerns and cybercrime. Cultural lag highlights the dynamic and sometimes discordant nature of societal change.
Critically examine Arjun Appadurai’s conceptualization of global cultural economy. 20M-2023
Arjun Appadurai’s conceptualization of the global cultural economy involves the idea of “scapes” – ethnoscapes, mediascapes, technoscapes, finanscapes, and ideoscapes. These overlapping and interrelated flows shape the global cultural landscape. Appadurai argues that globalization is not homogenizing but rather creates complex, disjunctive, and fluid cultural processes. He emphasizes the importance of imagination in social life, as people envision and strive for new possibilities. Critics argue that while Appadurai’s framework captures the complexity of globalization, it may understate the persistent power imbalances and economic inequalities that shape global cultural interactions.
Discuss the historical and cultural contexts that led to superseding ethnocentrism with cultural relativism in anthropology. 15M–2022
The shift from ethnocentrism to cultural relativism in anthropology arose from increased exposure to diverse cultures during colonialism, prompting a need to understand rather than judge different societies. Franz Boas and his students championed cultural relativism, emphasizing that cultures should be evaluated on their own terms rather than by external standards. This approach challenged previous notions of Western superiority and promoted an appreciation of cultural diversity. The horrors of World War II and the subsequent human rights movement further reinforced the importance of understanding and respecting cultural differences, solidifying cultural relativism as a core anthropological principle.
Human rights and cultural relativism. 10 M (2020)
The relationship between human rights and cultural relativism is complex. Cultural relativism advocates for understanding and evaluating cultures based on their own values and norms, which can sometimes conflict with universal human rights principles. Critics argue that cultural relativism can justify practices that violate human rights, such as gender discrimination or child labor. Conversely, proponents assert that imposing universal standards can be ethnocentric and disrespectful of cultural diversity. The challenge lies in balancing respect for cultural differences with the protection of fundamental human rights, promoting dialogue and context-sensitive approaches to human rights issues.
Short notes on Cultural Relativism 10 M (2019, 2016, 1995, 1987)
Cultural relativism is the anthropological principle that cultures should be understood and evaluated based on their own values and norms rather than judged by external standards. It challenges ethnocentrism and promotes appreciation for cultural diversity. Developed by Franz Boas and his students, cultural relativism underscores that no culture is superior or inferior to another. While it fosters tolerance and cross-cultural understanding, it also raises ethical questions about practices that may conflict with universal human rights. Cultural relativism remains a foundational concept in anthropology, emphasizing respect and context in studying human societies.
Is culture unique to human beings? Critically examine. (15 Marks 2014)
While culture is most elaborately developed in humans, it is not entirely unique to them. Many non-human primates exhibit cultural behaviors, such as tool use, grooming rituals, and social learning. For example, chimpanzees use sticks to extract termites and have specific social customs. However, human culture is distinguished by its complexity, symbolic communication, cumulative knowledge, and ability to transmit sophisticated customs and technologies across generations. The critical examination of culture’s uniqueness highlights the continuum of cultural behaviors across species while recognizing the unparalleled depth and breadth of human cultural practices.
Why the concept of Culture Relativism been so dear to Anthropologists? (20 Marks 2013)
Cultural relativism is central to anthropology because it promotes objective and respectful study of diverse cultures. By avoiding ethnocentrism, anthropologists can understand societies on their own terms, fostering deeper insights into human behavior and social organization. This approach challenges biases and stereotypes, enabling a more accurate and empathetic representation of cultures. Cultural relativism also supports ethical fieldwork practices, emphasizing the importance of respecting local customs and values. In a globalized world, this concept is crucial for addressing cultural diversity and promoting intercultural dialogue, making it an invaluable tool for anthropologists.
Bring out the distinguishing features of culture and civilization. (15 Marks 2013)
Culture encompasses the beliefs, practices, symbols, and artifacts that characterize a group or society, reflecting their way of life. It includes language, religion, customs, and social norms. Civilization, on the other hand, refers to complex societies with advanced levels of social, political, and economic organization. Key features of civilization include urbanization, centralized government, writing systems, and technological advancements. While all civilizations have cultures, not all cultures form civilizations. Civilizations represent a specific stage of cultural development marked by institutionalized structures and sophisticated technologies, distinguishing them from simpler cultural forms.
Cultural relativism and subsequent violation of Human rights? (15 Marks — 2010)
Cultural relativism can sometimes conflict with universal human rights, as it advocates for understanding and respecting cultural practices based on internal standards, which may include practices deemed as rights violations, such as female genital mutilation or child labor. Critics argue that this perspective can be used to justify harmful traditions. However, proponents of cultural relativism caution against ethnocentrism and emphasize the need for context-sensitive approaches to human rights. The challenge lies in finding a balance between respecting cultural diversity and protecting fundamental human rights, fostering dialogue to address conflicts and promote mutual understanding.
Components of culture vast and varied”. Explain this statement. (2002)
Culture comprises a wide array of components that shape the identity and functioning of a society. These include tangible elements like artifacts, clothing, and architecture, and intangible aspects such as language, beliefs, values, customs, and social norms. Additionally, culture encompasses arts, literature, rituals, traditions, and technology. The vastness and variety of cultural components reflect the diversity of human experiences and expressions across different societies. This complexity allows for rich cultural tapestries that adapt and evolve over time, illustrating the dynamic and multifaceted nature of human culture.
Acculturation and Contra-acculturation (1997)
Acculturation refers to the process where individuals or groups from one culture come into contact with another culture and adopt its practices, leading to cultural changes. Contra-acculturation, on the other hand, involves resistance to cultural assimilation and the reassertion of traditional cultural identities. This resistance can manifest through the revival of native customs, languages, and values. Both processes highlight the dynamic nature of cultural interaction, where acculturation can lead to cultural blending and innovation, while contra-acculturation emphasizes the preservation and reaffirmation of cultural uniqueness in the face of external influences.
Culture trait and culture complex (1999)
A culture trait is a single element or characteristic of a culture, such as a specific tool, practice, or belief. Examples include chopsticks in East Asian dining or the Hindu practice of yoga. A culture complex, on the other hand, is a combination of interrelated culture traits that together form a distinct cultural practice or phenomenon. For example, the culture complex of a traditional wedding includes various traits like ceremonies, rituals, attire, and customs. Understanding culture traits and complexes helps anthropologists analyze the components and structures of cultural systems and their interconnections.
Culture as construct or reality (1989)
Culture can be seen both as a construct and a reality. As a construct, culture is an abstract concept created by humans to make sense of and categorize their shared practices, beliefs, and values. It provides a framework for understanding social behavior and organization. As a reality, culture is the lived experience of individuals within a society, encompassing tangible artifacts, practices, and social norms. This dual perspective highlights that while culture is a conceptual tool for analysis, it also manifests concretely in everyday life, shaping and being shaped by human interactions and environments.
Super organic view of culture (1998)
The super organic view of culture, proposed by Alfred Kroeber, suggests that culture exists above and beyond the individual, functioning as a complex, autonomous system. It implies that cultural elements and patterns operate independently of individual human beings, shaping their behaviors and thoughts. This perspective emphasizes the collective nature of culture, wherein cultural norms, values, and practices are seen as products of social groups rather than individual contributions. The super organic view underscores the power and influence of culture in guiding human actions and maintaining social order, while also evolving through collective processes.
Pattern of culture (1998)
The concept of the pattern of culture, developed by Ruth Benedict, refers to the unique configuration of traits and behaviors that characterize a particular culture. Benedict argued that each culture develops its own coherent and integrated pattern, which shapes the attitudes, values, and behaviors of its members. This pattern is reflected in various cultural elements, such as rituals, social structures, and art. Benedict’s work emphasized cultural diversity and the distinctiveness of cultural patterns, challenging ethnocentric views and highlighting the importance of understanding cultures within their own contexts. Patterns of culture shape the identities and worldviews of individuals within societies.
What do you understand by cultural relativistic approach & ethnocentric approach in the study of culture? Discuss the logical premises of cultural relativistic approach. (1997)
The cultural relativistic approach involves understanding and evaluating cultures based on their own values and norms, avoiding judgment by external standards. It promotes empathy, respect for diversity, and context-specific analysis. The logical premises include recognizing the inherent value of all cultures, the idea that no culture is superior, and that cultural practices have meaning within their specific contexts. The ethnocentric approach, in contrast, judges cultures by one’s own cultural standards, often leading to bias and misunderstanding. Cultural relativism is crucial for anthropologists to avoid bias and gain deeper insights into human societies.
How does culture differ from civilization? Describe the attributes of Culture? (1987)
Culture and civilization differ in scope and complexity. Culture encompasses the beliefs, practices, artifacts, and social norms of a group, reflecting their way of life. Civilization refers to advanced societies with complex institutions, urbanization, writing systems, and technological progress. Attributes of culture include symbols (language, art), values (moral beliefs), norms (social rules), rituals (ceremonial acts), artifacts (material objects), and social structures (family, political systems). While all civilizations have cultures, not all cultures form civilizations. Culture is the broader concept encompassing both simple and complex societal forms, shaping human behavior and interaction.
Radcliffe-Brown’s ideas on status, role, and institution. 10M—2023
Radcliffe-Brown emphasized the structural-functional approach, viewing society as an interconnected system. Status refers to an individual’s position in society, while role denotes the behaviors expected from that status. Institutions are stable patterns of behavior centered on fulfilling society’s essential functions. For instance, the family institution regulates reproduction and socialization. Radcliffe-Brown highlighted that these elements are interdependent, ensuring social cohesion and stability. He believed that understanding the roles, statuses, and institutions reveals how societies maintain order and adapt to changes.
Critically evaluate different types of social stratification with suitable examples (20 Marks, 2021)
Social stratification refers to the hierarchical arrangement of individuals in society. Major types include class, caste, and status groups. Class stratification, evident in capitalist societies, is based on economic factors (e.g., the bourgeoisie and proletariat). Caste stratification, prominent in India, is hereditary and rigid, determining social interactions and occupational roles. Status group stratification, discussed by Max Weber, involves prestige and lifestyle differences. Each type influences individuals’ life chances, social mobility, and power dynamics. While class stratification allows some mobility, caste systems are rigid, perpetuating inequality. Weber’s status groups highlight the multifaceted nature of social hierarchies.
Discuss Erving Goffman’s concept of total institutions and its relevance in contemporary society. 15 M (2020)
Erving Goffman’s concept of total institutions describes places where individuals are isolated from society and subjected to strict control (e.g., prisons, mental hospitals). These institutions break down individual identities and enforce new roles and behaviors through regimented routines. Goffman argued that total institutions lead to depersonalization and loss of autonomy. In contemporary society, the relevance of total institutions is seen in discussions about prison reform, mental health treatment, and the impacts of long-term institutionalization. Understanding Goffman’s concept helps address issues of human rights, rehabilitation, and the reintegration of individuals into society.
Discuss Social stratification according to any three major approaches. 20 marks (2019)
Social stratification can be analyzed through three major approaches: Functionalist, Conflict, and Weberian. The Functionalist approach (Davis and Moore) views stratification as necessary for societal stability, ensuring that the most qualified individuals fill essential roles. The Conflict approach (Karl Marx) sees stratification as a result of capitalist exploitation, creating class struggles between the bourgeoisie and proletariat. The Weberian approach considers multiple dimensions—class, status, and party—acknowledging that economic, social, and political factors contribute to stratification. Each approach offers distinct insights into how and why societies are stratified, highlighting issues of power, inequality, and social cohesion.
Society and culture (10Marks 2015)
Society and culture are interrelated concepts in anthropology. Society refers to a group of individuals bound by social relationships and institutions, whereas culture encompasses the beliefs, practices, norms, and artifacts shared by members of a society. Culture shapes societal behaviors and institutions, while society provides the structure within which culture is transmitted and practiced. For example, kinship systems are societal structures that are deeply influenced by cultural norms regarding family and marriage. Understanding both concepts is essential for analyzing human behavior and social organization, as they together create the framework for human interaction and identity.