Psychology As Level Paper 1 Flashcards
(12 cards)
Outline how two variables investigated by Asch affected conformity.
Changing group size- 1 con=3%, 2cons= 13%, 3cons=33%, social pressure increased conformity due to ISI
Task difficulty- more difficult the task, the more conformity, as uncertainty is increased. ISI
Explain two ethical limitations of Asch’s investigations into conformity.
Deception- participants thought they were taking part in a test of perception
Lack of protection from harm- participants may feel embarrased or pressured
Suggest two reasons why Asch’s conformity investigations could be considered to be unrealistic
Artificial task- judging line length is not an everyday activity therefore lacks mundane realism
Demand characteristics as in a lab setting so may have guessed aim of study, this is not how conformity would work in real life
Outline flexibility as a factor in minority influence.
Where minority group is able to make compromises
Makes them seem more reasonable and therefore persuasive
Consistency and commitment in minority influence
Consistency- repeating same message, challenging beliefs
Synchronic- within members of group
Diachronic- over time
Draws attention
Commitment- demonstrate this by making sacrifices, shows they truly believe
Conversion
Snowball effect/ social cryptomnesia
Describe sensory register
Large capacity
Duration is 50 ms
Receives the info from all senses
One strength and limitation of volunteer sampling
Strength- less effort for psychologist
Limitation- volunteer bias
The psychologist was concerned that the number of correct answers recalled would be affected by participants taking part in both conditions of the experiment
Explain one way the psychologist could deal with this problem.
Independent group designs
Remove order effects such as fatigue or practice
Participants will only take part in one condition each
Evaluate research into post event discussion as a factor that affects accuracy of EWT
Younger and older people are more affected by this
Gabbert et al- 71% of witnesses in group where post event discussion happened, recalled incorrect info from video
60% said girl guilt
Some research has taken place in lab so no ecological validity
Population validity
Discuss interference as an explanation for forgetting.
•interference is where different pieces of information become confused in memory
• proactive interference is where old learning affects recall of new information
• retroactive interference is where new learning affects recall of old information
• newer information may overwrite earlier information
• interference is more likely to occur when the pieces of information are similar or smaller gap of time in between them
Schmidt et al- 211, 11-79y/o, childhood street names, more times moved, less street names remembered (retro)
Briefly describe Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation.
disruption of the altachment between infant and primary caregiver (mother) could result in long-term intellectual (low IQ), social (delinquency), and emotional (affectionless psychopathy) difficulties for that infant
Critical period- 2 and a half years
Irreversible damage
Internal working model
Using one example of cultural variations in attachment, explain Dave’s comments about insecure attachments.
•higher rates of insecure-avoidant attachments among German infants (35%) / as mothers encourage independence
• higher rates of insecure-resistant attachments in collectivist cultures, eg Japan (27%) / infants are rarely separated (Van lizendoorn and Kroonenberg, 1988) meta analysis