Psychology paper 1 subjects to work on Flashcards
(66 cards)
Resistance to social influence:
How does social support affect conformity?
Asch’s research shows dissenting peer enables person to be free to follow own conscience. Dissenting peer acts as a model.
Resistance to social influence:
How does social support affect obedience?
Milgram’s variations- rate of obedience dropped from 65% to 10% when disobedient confederate joined genuine participant.
Resistance to social influence:
Who researched into Locus of Control (LOC)?
Rotter.
Resistance to social influence:
What did Rotter research into?
Concept concerned with internal control vs external control.
Resistance to social influence:
What has LOC got to do with resistance to social influence?
People with high internal LOC are more likely to resist pressures to conform/obey. Their personality traits lead to greater resistance t social influence.
Minority influence:
Who studied the blue slide, green slide?
Moscovici.
Minority influence:
What did Moscovici research into?
Group of 6 asked to view set of 36 blue slides varying in intensity. Asked to state if slides were blue or green.
Each group had 2 confederates who consistently said slides were green on 2 thirds of trials.
What were Moscovici’s findings?
Same wrong answer- 8.42%
Same wrong answer at least once- 32%
Second group exposed to inconsistent minority- agreement fell to 12.5%.
Third control group had no confederates and participants just identified colour of each slide.
What is process of change?
Consistency, commitment and flexibility make you think about a topic. Over time, increasing numbers of people switch from minority to majority this is the snowball effect.
Social change:
What are the stages of Social change?
1) Drawing attention
2) Consistency
3) Deeper processing
4) Augmentation principle
5) Snowball effect
6) Social cryptomnesia
Social change:
How does Asch’s research highlight social change?
Importance of dissent-
Confederate gave correct answers throughout variation breaking power of majority and encouraged others to dissent.
Effects of similarity:
Who outlined the procedure?
McGeoch and McDonald.
Effects of Similarity:
What was the research of McGeoch and McDonald?
Studied retroactive interference by changing amount of similarity between two types of materials.
Effects of Similarity:
What was the procedure of McGeoch and McDonald?
Participants had to learn list of 10 words until they could remember with 100% accuracy. Then learned a new list. 6 groups of participants had to learn different types of word lists.
Effects of Similarity:
What were McGeoch and McDonald’s findings?
Performance depended on nature of second list when participants recalled original list. The most similar material produced worst recall.
Effects of Similarity:
What was the most similar material?
Synonyms.
Effects of Similarity:
What did the findings suggest?
Interference is strongest when memories are similar.
Retrieval Failure:
Why do people forget?
Insufficient cues. When info is first put in memory, cues that are associated are stored at the same time.
If cues are not available at time of recall, it may appear that you have forgotten but it is due to retrieval failure.
Retrieval Failure:
What is ESP?
Encoding specificity principle.
Retrieval Failure:
Who researched into ESP?
Tulving.
Retrieval Failure:
What was Tulving’s findings?
If cues available at encoding and retrieval are different, there will be some forgetting.
Retrieval Failure:
Who carried out research into context-dependant forgetting?
Godden and Baddely.
Retrieval Failure:
What did Godden and Baddely research into?
Scuba-divers.
Retrieval Failure:
What were Godden and Baddely’s findings?
Accurate recall was 40% in non-matching conditions.