Public Health Flashcards

0
Q

Specificity

A

The likelihood of a test to be negative in people who do not have the disease.

TN/TN+FP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Sensitivity

A

Likelihood of a test to be positive in someone who actually has the disease.

TP/ TP + FN

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Positive predictive value

A

Of the test is positive how likely is it that the person has the disease

TP/TP+FP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Negative predictive value

A

Of the people that test negative what percentage are truly negative

TN/TN+FN

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Possible reasons to criminalize drinking in preg

A

Coerce women to treatment
Punish those who break social norms
Act as deterrent for behavior that risks fetus.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Reasons why criminalization of drinking in preg is bad

A

Lack of evidence that coercion is effective.
Shouldn’t be punished when behavior is routes in social causes.
Punishment may be discriminatory (eg father not sentenced)
Health professional drawn into criminal justice system = ethical contradiction.
Woman more likely to stay away from health services.
Taking woman to prison after giving birth isn’t wise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Health promotion principles that should be applied when arguing against criminalization of drinking in preg

A

Empowerment
Re-orientating health services
Policy intervention rather than individual victim blaming

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Disease specific factors for screening test suitability

A
Common
Cause serious morbidity or mortality 
Is the natural history understood
Is presymptomatic stage easy to detect
Does early detection improve prognosis
Is there an effective treatment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Features of RCT that make it superior to other study designs

A

Participants randomly selected - prevents selection bias
Both control and intervention groups have same baseline characteristics including known and unknown risk factors (random selection = equal chance)
Assists with control of confounding.
Blinding of researchers and participants = minimize measurement bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What extent has smoking legislation been effective in SA

A
Reduced prevalence
Millions have stopped smoking
Drastic annual decrease in consumption
Number of students who have never smoked increased
Number of frequent smokers declined
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Possible reasons why percentage deaths could be lower over time

A

Actual death rates decrease
Percentage could lower due to another cause increasing = competing cause of death
Data collection methods may have changed
The way the data was analyses may have changed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Public health strategies to decrease a lifestyle disease

A

Devote resources
Change certain policies
Health promotion campaigns (awareness, education)
Advise population on specific lifestyle changes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Difference between a CIT and a RCT

A

In RCT individuals are selected at random. In CIT groups, facilities or entire communities selected at random.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Design features of a CIT that minimize bias

A

Randomization
Blinding of both participants and researchers
A prospective design shows temporality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Do all woman have access to safe a abortion services in SA

A

No.
Most HCW refused to perform TOP.
Legislation alone cannot ensure implementation.
Legal TOP often inaccessible and seen as unacceptable.
Shortage of trained staff
Despite legislation only 15% or centers were open one year later.
TOP faces stiff opposition therefore hard to implement outside major urban centers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Risk factors for FAS

A

Drinking weekly, binging, smoking, drug abuse, alcoholic partner, many family members who drink, FASD in the family, drinking from an early age, no reduction of drinking in preg, rural areas, employee on farm, low SES, low education status, small mothers (height and weight) history of stillborn children.

32
Q

Policy level intervention strategies against alcohol

A

Improve enforcement of existing strategies (min age, drink driving, retail sales)
Increase restrictions on alcohol marketing
Counter marketing for alcohol
Encouraging community mobilization
Implementing restrictions on size of container
Restricting products with clear appeal to underage
Specific labeling on alcohol
Warning stickers on alcohol
Implementing a graduated licensing policy for novice drivers.

33
Q

Describe current TOP legislation

A

The choice of termination of pregnancy act
Woman may terminate on request in first 12 weeks, can be provided by trained HCW (nurse, midwife)
After 12 weeks abortion must be provided by doctor
Between 12 and 20 weeks following circumstances
Adverse effect on woman’s mental/physical health
SES
Rape or incest
Fetus at risk of severe mental/physical abnormality
Beyond 20 weeks = very limited conditions

34
Q

Rights of HCW objecting to performing TOP

A

May refuse to perform TOP. Obliged to inform woman about their right to TOP and refer her to another person or centre.
Must provide nursing care to that patient.
A HCW refusing to perform TOP must lodge in writing his/her refusal to do so.

35
Q

Define confounding

A

A bias that occurs in observational studies when a third variable results in an apparent association between an exposure and outcome.

To be a confounder 1. Independent determinant of disease 2. Associated with exposure

36
Q

Define a hazard

A

Environmental stressor that has capacity to do harm

37
Q

Define risk

A

The likelihood or possibility that a harmful event may take place

38
Q

Hazard categories

A
Physical
Chemical
Biological 
Ergonomic 
Psychosocial
39
Q

Public health response to meningococcal disease

A
Immediate telephone notification (written given later)
Rapid investigation of case
Classify case
Identify close contacts
Provide prophylaxis 
Identify other cases in institution
40
Q

Potential disadvantages of a medical aid healthcare scheme

A

Patient not aware of costs
Dr no incentive to keep cost down
Imbalance between Dr and patient knowledge -> unnecessary procedures
Over servicing or ‘moral hazard’

41
Q

7 Bradford Hill criteria for causation

A
Temporality
Strength of association
Dose response effect
Biological plausibility 
Consistency 
Precision
Cessation of exposure
42
Q

Factors (of the test itself) regarding suitability of test for screening

A

Sensitivity and specificity
Cost
Easy to do
Acceptable to patients

43
Q

Health service requirements for screening test

A

Adequate facilities for screen and for follow up
Is treatment effective, safe and acceptable
What are costs/ benefit of screening vs not

44
Q

Advantage of randomly selecting groups

A

Randomization prevents bias (no subjective choosing of group)
Assists with controlling confounding

45
Q

Disadvantages of RCT

A

Expensive
Ethically challenging
Loss to follow up
Longer term effects may not be detected

46
Q

Three reasons for notifiable diseases

A

NB for country (TB)
Contact tracing, early detection,and prevention of spread (meningococcal, typhoid)
Monitor vaccine efficacy (Hib)

47
Q

Why do women not have access to top

A
  • inequitable distribution of resources
  • staff resistance
  • abusive treatment by hospital staff
  • fear of breaching confidentiality
  • lack of trained personnel
  • long waiting lists
  • lack of knowledge of legislation
  • stigma
48
Q

Action in a type 1 notifiable disease

A

Immediate notification by phone or email followed by written notification within 7 days of notification

49
Q

What defines an outbreak?

A

Two or more probable confirmed cases in a 4 week interval in a group which makes sense epidemiologically
Or
3 cases of confirmed or probable meningococcal disease in less than 3 months of the same serogrouping with a history if common affliction but in close contact

50
Q

Why may mothers have top between weeks 12-20

A
  • adverse effects on woman’s mental or physical health
  • socio-economic status
  • rape or incest
  • fetus would suffer severe physical or mental abnormality