sexual selection
attributes or behaviors that increase reproductive success (Charles Darwin)
intersexual selection and study
-one sex chooses mate from the opposite sex based on specific attractive traits for good genes
-Clark and Hatfield, would you sleep with me tonight study, 50% date 75% sex for men, 50% date 0% sex for women
intrasexual selection and study
-members of the same sex compete for the same mate
-Daly and Wilson, men are violent when their relationship is threatened by another man, 92% men on men homicides involving love triangles
anisogamy
differences between male and female sex cells
cuckoldry
male unknowingly raising non-related offspring
self disclosure
revealing personal information about yourself, revealing more information as time progresses
social penetration theory
*Altman and Taylor
*gradual process of revealing your inner self to someone
*onion metaphor
*reciprocal
Shackelford and Larsen
People with more symmetrical faces are more attractive
the halo effect
*Dion et al
*”pretty privilege”
*beautiful people are consistently rated as kind, strong, sociable and successful
the matching hypothesis
*Walster and Walster
* people tend to marry and date people, similarly attractive to themselves
filter theory
*Kerckhoff and Davis
1. social demography (geographical location, social class, level of education, ethnic group, religion)
2. similarity in attitudes (beliefs and values - only for couple who have been together for less than 18 months)
3. complementarity (trait that the other doesn’t have/can’t provide for themselves)
social exchange theory
*Thibault and Kelley
*rewards-costs=satisfaction
*consider profit and loss
comparison level (CL) vs comparison level for alternative (CLalt)
*comparison level= judge how one partner compares to another (e.g ex partner, tv, social media etc)
comparison level for alternatives= can we gain greater profit from another relationship or being single (Duck- if the costs outweigh the rewards, the alternates become more attractive)
stages of relationship development
equity theory
*walster
*strive for fairness
*not about the size or amount of rewards and costs, it’s about the ratio of the two together
consequence of inequity
*distressed and dissatisfied
*changes of perceived equity as relationship develops
dealing with inequity
*the underbenefitted partner is more motivated to make the relationship equitable
*revise perceptions of costs and rewards, what was seen as a cost is now a reward
Rusbult’s investment model
intrinsic vs extrinsic investments
*in= money, possessions, energy, self disclosure
*ex= possessions bought together (car), children, shared memories
Duck’s phase model
virtual relationships in social media
*paralanguage, the way we say words
*computer mediated communication (CMC)
*face to face (FtF)
theories explaining self disclosure in virtual relationships
selective self preservation
painting yourself in a good light, manipulating your online image
para social relationships
one-sided unreciprocated, fan and celebrity