UNIT 4 Flashcards
(36 cards)
social perception
It’s the process by which people come to understand one another
how the perception of other people can be influenced by their physical appearance
Spreading back to the times of pythagoras and hippocrates, we analyze physical features to give us impressions of who people really were. Evolution programmed us to baby features or baby traits. Social perceivers judge your facial expressions.
scripts
Preset notions about certain types of situations, context for settings, influence anticipation.
Scripts or previous knowledge of social settings allows us to apply context to our physical observations, impacting our understanding of verbal and nonverbal behavior.
six “primary” emotions expressed by the face
Fear
happiness
anger
sadness
disgust
surprise
how people use non-verbal cues such as eye contact to judge others
Nonverbal cues have meaning attached to them. The meaning is read from the queues and applied to the context culture or impression. eg. Eye contact or no eye contact
channels of communication are most likely to reveal that someone is lying
The spoken word - words chosen
the face- facial expression
the body- body cues/posture
the voice- voice is most telling, hesitation, speed, pitch
personal attributions
Internal characteristics of an actor such as ability, personality, mood or effort.
situational attributions
Factors external to the actors, such as the task or other people or their luck
correspondent inference theory
psychological theory that explains how people judge others’ behaviors and decide what those behaviors say about their personality or character.
covariation principle
Principle of attribution theory that holds that people attribute behavior to factors that are present when a behavior occurs and are absent when it does not
cognitive heuristics
mental shortcuts or simple rules our brains use to make decisions or solve problems quickly and efficiently
availability heuristic
A tendency to estimate the likelihood that an event will occur by how easily instances of it come to mind
false-consensus effect
Tendency for people to overestimate the extent to which others share their opinion attributes or behaviors. Eg. Going to managment with assumptions of ataff support
the base-rate fallacy
The fighting that people are relatively insensitive to consensus information presented in the form of numerical base rates.
how the availability heuristic can give rise to the false-consensus effect and the base-rate fallacy
The availability heuristic leads us to make judgments based on what comes to mind easily. This can cause:
The false-consensus effect, where we overestimate how many people share our views because those views are common in our circle and easy to recall.
The base-rate fallacy, where we ignore general statistics and focus on vivid examples that are more memorable.
Both effects happen because we rely on what’s easiest to remember, not what’s most accurate.
counter-factual thinking
Tendwncy to imagine alternative events or outcomes that might have occurred, but did not. “What if” regret, and when we reflect on what might have been.
When is counter-factual thinking likely to occur
Likely to occur in instances where we have failed or where we could have done better. The what if scenarios
fundamental attribution error.
Tendency to focus on the role of personal causes and underestimate the impact of situations on other peoples behavior.
two-step-process model for occurrence of the fundamental attribution error
1) Identify the behavior and make a quick personal attribution (simple and automatic)
2) then reassess correct, adjust that inference to include situational influences.Such as attention thought and effort
factors make the fundamental attribution error less likely to occur
When there’s a lack of time or efforts or motivation, we sit in. Step one, and if we have time or motivation and put in the effort, we work on step two, which then leads to less errors
What is the “belief in a just world
Suggest that individuals get what they deserve in life, which leads to people to disparage victims
summation model
We mentally add up all the positive and negative traits of a person.The more positive or the more negative increases, or decreases our impression
averaging model of impression formation
Our impressions are based on average traits observed, for example, highly positive trades. Would be lowered by one or two negative traits
information integration theory
how individuals combine information from multiple sources to form judgments or attitudes about people, objects, or situations.
Impressions are based on two things:
1) perceiver dispositions
2) weighted average of target persons traits