W9 - REFERENCE Flashcards

(42 cards)

1
Q

What is the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis and how does it relate to cognitive development?

A

The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis proposes that the structure of language influences how individuals perceive and think about the world, suggesting language shapes cognitive processes such as categorisation, memory, and perception. (Sapir, 1929; Whorf, 1956)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How does research on colour perception support linguistic relativity?

A

Winawer et al. (2007) found that Russian speakers, who have distinct terms for light and dark blue, were faster at distinguishing these shades than English speakers, suggesting language influences perceptual discrimination.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What evidence suggests that language influences categorisation in infancy?

A

Studies by Waxman & Markow (1995), Waxman & Balaban (1997), and Fulkerson & Waxman (2007) found that 9–12-month-old infants categorised objects better when exposed to labels (e.g., “Look at the moxi!”) than to tones.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did Ferry et al. (2010) find about the role of language in categorisation for 3–4-month-old infants?

A

They found preverbal infants formed categories more effectively when exposed to words rather than tones, indicating links between language and categorisation emerge early.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the mechanism by which language supports categorisation in infancy?

A

Althaus & Plunkett (2016) suggest hearing words directs infants’ attention to commonalities among objects, facilitating conceptual category formation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How does language contribute to spatial cognition in toddlers?

A

Hermer & Spelke (1994) showed toddlers could not integrate geometric and landmark cues in spatial tasks until spatial language was introduced, indicating language helps combine multiple reference frames.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How do cross-linguistic differences affect spatial cognition in adults?

A

Levinson (1997) found Dutch speakers (relative encoding) and Tzeltal speakers (absolute encoding) remembered spatial arrays differently based on their language’s spatial framework.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does Haun et al. (2011) reveal about language and spatial cognition in children?

A

By age 8, children from different language backgrounds adopted spatial strategies consistent with their native language (absolute vs. relative encoding), indicating developmental influence of language.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How does language affect numerical cognition according to Miller et al. (1995)?

A

Miller et al. found Mandarin-speaking children, whose language uses a regular number naming system, learned counting more easily and performed better on abstract counting tasks than English speakers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What aspects of numerical cognition are language-independent?

A

The analog magnitude system and object individuation system allow estimation and small-set tracking without symbolic language. (Dehaene, 1997; Spelke & Xu, 2000)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is categorisation and how does it relate to language?

A

Categorisation is grouping objects by shared features or functions; language plays a key role in expressing, communicating, and facilitating category learning. (Waxman & Markow, 1995)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Can categorisation occur without language?

A

Yes, but language supports it by encouraging comparisons and reinforcing shared labels. (Althaus & Plunkett, 2016)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was found in Waxman & Markow (1995) and Waxman & Balaban (1997)?

A

Infants formed categories more readily when shown objects with linguistic labels than with non-linguistic sounds; words facilitated category formation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How did Fulkerson & Waxman (2007) test infants’ categorisation?

A

Infants saw objects with words, non-specific language, or tones—only those hearing words grouped items into categories.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What age group did Ferry et al. (2010) study, and what did they find?

A

Studied 3–4-month-olds; 3-month-olds preferred familiar categories and 4-month-olds novel ones, showing categories guided by language.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What conclusion can be drawn from Ferry et al. (2010)?

A

Even preverbal infants use linguistic labels to support categorisation; labels scaffold early concept formation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the mechanism by which words support categorisation?

A

Listening to words prompts infants to seek commonalities among objects, acting as “invitations to categorize.” (Althaus & Plunkett, 2016)

18
Q

Do non-linguistic sounds have the same effect as words?

A

No—tones and other non-linguistic sounds do not facilitate categorisation like words do.

19
Q

What do these findings suggest about language and cognition?

A

Language influences cognition from early life by helping infants organise their perceptual world into categories; this effect is specific to linguistic input.

20
Q

Why is the link between words and categories developmentally important?

A

It lays the foundation for later conceptual learning and language acquisition, structuring infant cognition before speech production begins.

21
Q

What is the main way language supports spatial cognition?

A

Language helps integrate different spatial reference frames (landmark and geometric), enabling coherent spatial representations. (Hermer & Spelke, 1994)

22
Q

What did Hermer & Spelke (1994) find in their spatial disorientation task?

A

Toddlers relied only on geometric cues to reorient and ignored landmarks unless language highlighted them, showing language enables spatial information integration.

23
Q

How does language help toddlers combine geometric and landmark information?

A

Providing spatial language (e.g., “Look by the red wall”) allows integration of multiple cues into one spatial representation, improving navigation performance.

24
Q

What are the two key types of spatial reference frames?

A

Egocentric (“on my right”) and allocentric (“north of the car”).

25
How does adult spatial encoding differ based on language, per Levinson (1997)?
Dutch speakers use relative encoding; Tzeltal speakers use absolute encoding, showing language influences spatial strategies.
26
What did Haun et al. (2011) find in their cross-cultural study?
By age 8, children adopt spatial encoding strategies aligned with their native language (Dutch vs. Namibian), showing long-term language effects.
27
How does native language affect spatial categorisation in children?
Children attend to the spatial distinctions emphasised by their native language (e.g., tight-fit vs. loose-fit in Korean vs. English). (Choi & Bowerman, 1991)
28
What is the implication of language-specific spatial encoding?
Language shapes how children categorise and perceive spatial relationships, causing differences in mental representation across groups.
29
What is the conclusion about language and spatial representation?
Language doesn’t determine cognition but significantly influences how spatial information is categorised, remembered, and used.
30
What are the two non-symbolic number systems functioning without language?
The Analog Magnitude System (approximate, ratio-based) and the Object Individuation System (precise small-set tracking). (Spelke & Xu, 2000; Wynn, 1992)
31
What evidence supports the ANS in infants?
Spelke & Xu (2000) found 6-month-olds dishabituate to changes in dot number (8 vs. 16), showing approximate number sense.
32
What evidence supports newborns’ cross-modal number matching?
Izard et al. (2009) showed newborns look longer at visual arrays mismatching the number of sounds they heard.
33
What is the Object Individuation System and its evidence?
It tracks small sets (1–3 items); Wynn (1992) showed 5-month-olds surprised by impossible small-set arithmetic outcomes.
34
How did Feigenson & Carey (2003) demonstrate object individuation in action?
Infants chose the bucket with more crackers, showing precise small-set tracking guides behaviour.
35
What role does language play in symbolic number representation?
Language is required for symbolic systems—number words and numerals—that allow precise, unlimited numerical representation. (Lee & Sarnecka, 2010)
36
What is the Give-N Task and its finding?
It asks children to give a specific number of items; children progress from “one-knowers” to full cardinal principle understanding. (Lee & Sarnecka, 2010)
37
What are the cardinality principle and successor function?
Cardinality: final count word = total. Successor function: each number is one more than the last.
38
How do number naming systems affect early math learning?
Miller et al. (1995) found Mandarin’s transparent naming (e.g., “ten-one” for 11) helps children learn counting and place value earlier.
39
Do language effects on numerical cognition persist into later childhood?
Language influences early number learning, but effects diminish with age and formal education.
40
Can early numerical skills predict later math performance?
Yes; infants’ early ANS precision at 6 months predicts symbolic math performance at 3.5 years. (Starr et al., 2013)
41
Are symbolic and non-symbolic systems continuous or distinct?
Both persist: non-symbolic systems remain but symbolic systems allow exact, scalable representations via language.
42
What is the overall conclusion about language in numerical cognition?
Basic number sense emerges independently of language, but symbolic representation depends on language, influencing counting and arithmetic development.