Wk9: Groups and Belonging Flashcards

(36 cards)

1
Q

Belongingness Hypothesis

A

Human drive to maintain lasting, positive, significant interpersonal relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Ostracism

A

Being ignored/ socially excluded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Consequences of ostracism

A
  • Psychological distress
  • Negative affect
  • Social pain
  • Dehumanisation
  • Hostile worldview
  • Aggression
  • Susceptible to social influence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Self esteem effect

Ostracism effects

A
  • High: weaker ostracism effect
  • Low: stronger ostracism effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Social anxiety effect on ostracism

Ostracism effects

A
  • High: longer ostracism effect
  • Low: shorter ostracism effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Effect of chronic exclusion/ lonliness

Ostracism effects

A
  • Decreased well-being
  • Behavioural problems
  • Alcohol/ drug abuse
  • Mortality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Effects of workplace ostracism

Ostracism effects

A
  • Lower job performance
  • Lower job satisfaction
  • Lower job commitment
  • Greater burnout and tension
  • Greater intention to turnover
  • Greater turnover
  • More deviant behaviours
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Social surrogacy hypothesis

A

People capable of developing symbolic social connection with characters and groups from media

Media can surrogate/ temporarily replace social connection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Parasocial relationships

A

Relationships formed with television (visual channel) personalities
E.g. Has strong perceived connection to Harry Potter or JK Rowling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Narrative collective assimilation

A

Relationships formed with groups described in narratives
E.g. Has strong perceived connection to wizards; maybe from HP specifically.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define groups

A

Collection of individuals who perceive themselves as members of the same social category and thus, have a shared social identity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define social aggregate

A

Incidental gathering of individuals with no meaningful connection
E.g. city crowds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Types of groups

A

Common-bond
Common-identity
The type of connection that differentiates a group from a social aggregate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Common-bond groups

Group (bond) type

A

Members identify with the other members of the group
E.g. Identify with the neighbourhood because you identify with your neighbours
E.g. Identify with book club because you identify with other readers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Common-identity groups

Group (bond) type

A

Members identify with the group itself
E.g. Identify with the neighbourhood because you live there.
E.g. Identify with book club because you read the books

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Group functions

A

Need to belong
Social cooperation
Sense of purpose
Attention and behaviour
Positive sense of self
Social support and well-being
Psychological coping resource

The function of groups is to make individuals feel better with respect to themselves, others, etc

17
Q

Group roles

A
  • Sense of purpose, responsibilities
  • Division of labour, goals, functioning
  • Formal or informal
18
Q

Group norms

A

The social norms within a group - the member norms

19
Q

Black sheep effect

A
  • Ingroup members judged more positively than outgroup members
  • Ingroup members judged more for group deviation than outgroup deviators
20
Q

The social cure

A

Groups we belong to influence psychological and physical health

21
Q

Rejection identification model

Social identity model effect

A

Posits that marginalised people can reduce negative well-being by identifying with their marginalised group

22
Q

Social loafing

A

The tendency for individuals put less effort into group tasks where the judgement of results is pooled
I.e. people don’t do their part in group projects when not rated on their own contributions

23
Q

Coordination loss in group participation

A

It is harder to coordinate and perform tasks in groups than individually

24
Q

Motivation loss in group participation

A
  • Social loafing
  • Decreased motivation compared to individual tasks
25
Factors of social loafing
* Free-riding * Output equity * Absence of evaluation apprehension * Absence of clear standards
26
Free-riding ## Footnote Social loafing factor
Tendency for individuals to believe others will "pick up the slack" in group tasks
27
Output equity ## Footnote Social loafing factor
Tendency to believe others loaf, thus loaf to maintain "equality"
28
Evaluation apprehension ## Footnote Social loafing factor
Tendency to believe we are unidentifiable individually/ vaguely anonymous, thus do not feel socially judged or obligated to do tasks/ evaluation apprehension
29
Absence of clear standard ## Footnote Social loafing factor
No established standard/ no experience with group norm for performance, thus performance is hindered
30
Social compensation
* Opposite of social loafing * Exceeds performance expectations when (1) other members are assumed to loaf and (2) the group performance is important to individual
31
Group decision-making
Tendency for less cohesive groups to produce better decisions
32
Groupthink
When highly-cohesive groups value a unanimous decision over rational deliberation
33
Group polarisation
Tendency for group discussion between like-minded people to produce more extreme attitudes
34
Persuasive argument approach ## Footnote Group polarisation factor
Tendency to increase polarisation as more novel and compelling arguments (aligned with existing attitudes) are used.
35
Social comparison approach ## Footnote Group polarisation factor
Tendency to increase polarisation as part of conformity - to be more consistent with group norms
36
Uniform effects ## Footnote In-group vs. out-group
* Wearing a uniform encourages social compensation when an out-group is present * Wearing a uniform increases social loafing when no out-group is present * i.e. social group effects exacerbated with in-group identifiers