RESEARCH EXAM 2 Flashcards

1
Q

o In a retrospective correlational design
o An outcome in the present (depression) is linked to a hypothesized cause occurring in the past (having had a miscarriage)

A

retrospective designs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

o One retrospective design is a

A

case-control design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

o In which “cases” (those with lung cancer) are compared to “controls” (those without lung cancer) on prior potential causes (smoking habits)

A

retrospective designs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

retrospective designs look

A

back in time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

prospective designs look

A

forward

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

o A potential cause in the present (experiencing v.s. not experiencing a miscarriage) is linked to a hypothesized later outcome (depression 6 months later)

A

prospective designs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

prospective designs are called what by medical researchers

A

cohort study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

o Prospective designs are stronger than ____ _____ in supporting causal interferences—but neither is as strong as experimental designs

A

retrospective designs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

o Not all research is

A

cause probing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

o Some research is descriptive (ascertaining the prevalence of a health problem)

A

descriptive research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

the purpose of descriptive correlational

A

describe whether variables are related

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

do descriptive correlational research studies ascribe a cause & effect connection?

A

NO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

disadvantages of non experimental research

A

o Cannot show causation with assurance

o Prone to faulty interpretation because researchers work with preexisting groups that have formed through self-selection (selection bias)

o Results should be interpreted cautiously, especially if the research has no theoretical basis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

data are collected at a single point in time

A

cross-sectional design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

data are collected two or more times over an extended period

A

longitudinal design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

are better at showing patterns of change and at clarifying whether a cause occurred before an effect (outcome)

A

Longitudinal designs

17
Q

o Undertaken to assess the subsequent status of people with a specified condition or who received a specified intervention

A

follow-up studies

18
Q

o Longitudinal designs are better at showing ??? and at clarifying whether a cause occurred before an effect (outcome)

A

patterns of change

19
Q

a challenge in longitudional studies which means the loss of participants over time

A

attrition

20
Q

“drop out”

A

attrition

21
Q

examples of controlling external factors in quantitative data

A

achieving consistency of conditions

o Control over environment, setting, time

o Control over intervention via a formal protocol: intervention fidelity

22
Q

Control over intervention via a formal protocol is known as

A

intervention fidelity

23
Q

controlling participant factors=

A

randomization
homogeneity
matching
statistical control

24
Q

o Most effective method in controlling characteristics

A

randomization

25
Q

o Only people who are similar with respect to confounding variables are included in the study

(restricting sample)

A

homogeneity

26
Q

o Consciously forming comparable groups

A

matching

27
Q

ϖ (analysis of covariance)

A

statistical control

28
Q

♣ Powerful statistical control mechanism

A

analysis of covariance

29
Q

o The ability to detect the true relationships statistically

A

ϖ Statistical Conclusion Validity

30
Q

threats to statistical conclusion validity

A

low statistical validity

weakly defined “cause”

unreliable implementation of a treatment

31
Q

ex of low statistical power

A

sample too small

32
Q

o The extent to which researcher can be inferred that the independent variable caused or influenced the dependent variable

A

ϖ Internal Validity