Group Processes Flashcards

(38 cards)

1
Q

Categorisation

A

two or more individuls who percieve themselves to be members of the same social category

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

communication

A

two or more people who think of themselves as a group, are interdependent and communicate with one another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

influence

A

two or more persons who are interacting with one another in such a manner that the person influences and is influenced by each other person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

shared identity

A

two or more people possessing a common social identification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

shared tasks and goals

A

three or more people who work together interdependently on an agreed upon actitivy or goal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

interdependence

A

a dynamic whole based on interdependence rather than similarity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is not a group

A

-people who share some superficial similarity
-need for meaningul social connection between group members
-family
-emotional relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Forsyth’s definition of a group

A

a group is two or more inidviduals who are connected by and within social relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

group size

A

range in size from two members to many thousands

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

connection

A

members of a group are connected to each other like series of networked computers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

social relationships

A

people in a group are linked by their membership

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

list the main characteristics of groups

A
  1. interaction
  2. goals
  3. interdependence
  4. structure
  5. cohesiveness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

interaction

A

create, organise and sustain relationship nd task interactions among members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

goals

A

groups have instrumental purposes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

interdependence

A

members of a group depend on each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

structure

A

group members are connected to each other in organised and predictable patterns

17
Q

cohesiveness

A

closeness and solidarity of a group as a result of the development of strong and mutual interpersonal bonds among members

18
Q

why are groups important to investigate

A

-groups influence their memebrs and society

19
Q

social lofing

A

presence of other people can result in reduced effort of individual members

20
Q

variables that influence tendency to loaf

A

-identifiability
-individual responsibility
-commitment to task

21
Q

collective effort model

A

individuals will be willing to exert effort on a collective task only to the degree that they expect their efforts to be instrumental in obtaining valued outcomes.

22
Q

social loafing occurs when

A

people don’t believe that their individual efforts can result in acheiving valued outcomes
outcome of a group performance is viewed as trivial, not valued

23
Q

risky shift

A

Stoner found that groups made riskier decisions than individuals

24
Q

Group polarisation

A

a general tendency for group decision to be more extreme than the mean of its members position, in the direction favoured by the mean.

25
what is key to group polarisation
discussion among group members is key
26
why does group discussion lead to polarisation
the idea of INFORMATIONAL INFLUENCE persuasive arguments theory Group discussion brings to light previously unknown information that supports the individuals position
27
normative influence - why does group discussion lead to polarisation
desire for social approval and wish to avoid social censure discussion reveals the socially desirable position and members of the group want to be seen to be adhering to this position
28
social identity processes - why does group discussion lead to polarisation
individuals in the group create a group norm to define membership in the decision making group and then conform to that norm ingroup position is polarised away from outgroups self categorization produces conformity to the polarised ingroup norm
29
Groupthink
group decision making process that produces poor decisions, a mode of thinking in which the desire to reach unanimous agreement overrides the motivation to adopt proper rational decision-making procedures.
30
Conditions that foster group think
-a high degree of group cohesiveness -insulation of group from external information and influemce -lack of impartial leadership -absence of systematic decision-making procedures -high stress from external threat
31
symptoms of groupthink
-illusion of invulnerability -illusion of unanimity -suppression of personal doubts -self appointed mindguards
32
illusion of invulnerability
illusion of being invulnerable to dangers that might arise from risky action
33
illusion of unanimity
members wrongly believing in group consensus
34
suppression of personal doubts
in atmosphere of assumed consensus people suppress their objections
35
self appointed mindguards
members of a cohesive group supress any deviations from the group norm by applying direct social pressure on dissidents
36
stages of group think theory
antecedent conditions symptoms of group think poor decision making
37
how to prevent groupthink
-leaders should encourage critical evaluation of decisions and be open to criticism of their own judgements -leaders should state issues in an impartial way -groups to brek into subgroups with seperate leaders in reviewing alternative options -discuss group decisions with non-group members -consult qualified individuals outside the group regularly - a group member assigned to the role of devils advocate -alternative courses of action that opponents could take shuld be reviewed.
38
critical evaluation of groupthink theory
support from case studies, but limited support from lab research -importance of leadership in the quality of group decison making