lecture 20 - amnesia Flashcards
(40 cards)
Overview
- Types of amnesia: anterograde and retrograde amnesia.
- Causes.
- What is preserved?
- Episodic memory
- Anterograde amnesia and recollection and
familiarity. - Retrograde amnesia and a temporal gradient.
- Semantic memory
Studying amnesia
- Disorders of memory with preserved intellect and
language. Severe forgetfulness. - Difficult to keep a job, maintain relationships, look after
oneself and maintain an independent existence. - Anterograde amnesia – a problem in encoding, storing or
retrieving information that can be used in the future
(antero). - Retrograde amnesia – a problem accessing events that
happened in the past.
can look at amnesia from a cognitive perspective when we are interested in the cognitive deficits a individual has and we can also look at biological perspective where we are interested in Anatomical localisation. here the anatomical localisation is more important. also patient perspective when were interested in understanding a specific clinical condition. they can also be integration of those approaches aswell
Causes of amnesia
- Alzheimer’s disease (AD): most common cause of amnesia. Not a pure form of amnesia because usually complicated by additional symptoms of dementia - issues with langauge, thinking and problem solving. its a degenerative brain disorder often in older individuals
- Korsakoff syndrome: usually from chronic alcoholism and is mainly characterised by a memory impairment. Frequently studied, relatively pure form of amnesia. - due to lack of thymine - leads to specific deficits in memory
- Herpes simplex encephalitis: a virus of the brain which can
leave individuals severely amnesic. Very rare. E.g. Clive Wearing. - Temporal lobe surgery: individuals become amnesic as a result of deliberate surgical procedures. E.g. H.M.
for top two causes the onset of amnesia can be quite gradual but for the bottom two there is a precise moment of onset when the amnesia becomes apparent
H.M.: Henry Molaison
- Epileptic seizures at 10.
- Quality of life extremely poor, surgery at 27.
- Removal of the MTL (medial temporal lobes), including the hippocampi.
- Good news – no more seizures; bad news – profound memory problems.
- Several decades after op it was observed that H.M.: “does not know where he lives, who cares for him, or where he ate his last meal. His guesses as to the current year may be off by as much as 43 years… In 1982 he did not recognise a picture of himself taken on his 40th birthday in 1966”(Corkin, 1984, p.255)
the study of HM has been critical in psychology and it was the first evidence that the hippocampus is critical to memory
12,000 papers mentioned HM
- Anterograde deficit extremely severe. - the key problem he has
- Retrograde deficit extends back to age 16
(11 years before surgery).
What is preserved?
Short-term memory e.g. digit span (Baddeley & Warrington,
1970). - HM could a number in his for 15 minutes through constant rehearsal but a minute or two after stopping has no recollection of the number and doesnt remember being asked to remember a number = anterograde amnesia
- Procedural memory e.g. mirror drawing task (Corkin, 1968).
- can’t see hand but can see it in a mirror and you trace around a shape
- the black dots are those with korsocoff syndrome and rest are healthy controls
- the lines are very similar in terms of learning
Mirror-reading, 3 daily sessions
and retention 3 months
later. Cohen & Squire
(1980).
there doesnt seem to be any difficulties with procedural memory in amnesia
What is preserved?
Implicit memory: a person’s behaviour is influenced by a
previous experience despite not being consciously aware of it.
- Claparede (1911) handshake. - would handshake his amnesic patients hands on his ward rounds. one day put a pin in his hand and shook patients hands and next day when went to shake hand patient refused but she couldn’t explicitly say why. shows some implicit memory
- Warrington & Weiskrantz (1968) degraded pictures/words.
Same stimuli at a later time - marked improvement. Same for
H.M. (Milner et al., 1968). shows ability to learn implicitly - Graf et al. (1984) given a list of words to read
(e.g. METAL). Either asked to recall the word
shown previously (explicit) or generate the
first word that comes to mind (implicit) e.g.
ME___. Only explicit impaired, implicit
normal for individuals with amnesia.
Episodic memory - severely affected in amnesia
Typically episodic memory tasks use free-recall or recognition.
* According to dual-process models of memory two distinct bases for memory performance: ? familiarisation and recollection
recollection = when you can remember some contextual or some source details from the study or the learning episode
familiarisation = you recognise you have seen something before but can’t remember the contextual details
to do a free recall task you need recollection and for a recognition task you could use recollection or familiarity
- How do these map onto the two tasks?
Performance on the
Doors and People
test by Jon and 2
controls. Baddeley
et al. (2001) Jon was born prematurely and had breathing problems as a result of anoxia and this causes substantial damage to the hippocampus. Jons hippocampus is around less than half the size that it would normally be and its atypical in structure so Jon is a developmental amnesic. he is compared to two healthy controls
line on graph = population average
for Jon there is no real evidence of any deficits in the recognition task however for the recall task John has a profound impairment compared to the healthy controls and population average. Jon seems to have problems with recall specifically recollection
Recollection and familiarity: Jon
- Jon. Problems teaching him the R/K distinction.
- a remember response would indicate that you have seen the item before and you can recall some contextual info
- a know response should be given when you recognise that you’ve seen something before but cannot recover contextual info
- After he declared he understood. He was tested.
- Used R/K categories as often as controls but unable to
explain the basis of his R decisions. - Used a strength rather than a recollective criterion.
- used the left parietal ERP old/new effect
- Lacked the ‘remember’ component in an ERP study of
memory (Duzel et al., 2001). - Jon is fine for the process of familiarity
- his score is much lower for recollection
- Same deficit using a different task (PDP)
Recollection Familiarity Controls 0.41 (0.23). 0.47 (0.2) Jon 0.10 0.50
Recollection and familiarity:
Hypoxic patients
Yonelinas et al. (2002). 56 cardiac arrest patients who had suffered mild hypoxia when there is insufficient oxygen to brain and results in deficits In the hippocampus, 55
healthy controls.
hypoxia ptp have Greater deficit in recall.
graph
for RK paradigm
C = controls, H = Hypoxic, H+ = other
patients with hippocampal and other
medial temporal lobe (MTL) damage.
- for index of familiarity the hypoxic patients have lots of varaiblity but doenst seem to be a deficit in familiarity but for index of recollection they have profound problems with recollection
- for H+ individuals this leads to problems for recollection and familiarity
Dual-process model of memory
Aggleton & Brown (1999)
Hippocampus is critical for – recollection
Perirhinal regions critical for - familiarity
A controversial area
There are hippocampal amnesics who have deficits
in recall and recognition. e.g. papers by Squire.
Also dispute as to whether there are two
processes: R & F or whether they just reflect strong versus weak memory traces.
research in previous lectures suggest that recollection and familiarity are two separate things
Retrograde amnesia - when individuals have problems and deficit in recalling past events - things prior to onset of amnesia
- Need to test items learned prior to the onset of amnesia.
Researcher has no control over the learning. we dont know what the individual has learnt and how well they have learnt it. - Scales have been developed to test a range of events:
news, winners of classic horse races, TV shows… - Probe method: give someone a cue eg river (recall a personal memory and then
date it). - Koppelman et al. (1990) developed the Autobiographical
Memory Interview (AMI). Ask participants to remember
specific information from a range of time periods e.g. the
name of their first school. Then recollect a specific
personal event from the period.
they try to score up the amount of episodic info within those memories and the specificity of the memory
when we are trying to test retrograde amnesia and what the individual knew before the onset of amnesia it can be quite difficult to measure those things
Temporal retrograde
amnesia gradient
- For those with retrograde amnesia memories from earlier
in life are easier to recall than those later on (= Ribot’s
law). - Butters & Cermak (1986) report the case of P.Z. - who was a distinguished experimental psychologist who completed their memoirs before they got korsocoff syndrome. we can test their memory as we have their memoir where they had recounted details from their life so can identify events and facts the individual did know prior to the onset of their amnesia
found that memories from earlier in life are recalled far better than those that happened more recently = ribots law
Looks like an acute onset of amnesia. However PZ had a history of alcohol
abuse going back 35 years, could there be a progressive impairment in
ability to register new memories? its very hard to retrieve something if you had an impaired ability to get that into your memory eg didnt encode it in a deeper manner to allow you to remember it better later on
PZ wrote a memoir prior to onset of amnesia
Explanations of retrograde
amnesia (RA) - diagram in notes
- Standard consolidation models e.g. Alvarez & Squire
(1994) - Assume information is consolidated by transferring it
from one brain region to another (i.e. system
consolidation). - information coming in activates a number of areas in the cortex and its distributed across the cortex as when we have an experience it usuallly involves many sensory and cognitive areas so there may be sights, sounds, smells, emotions. initially when we are experiencing this its going to activate these different cortical areas and the hippocampus coordinates this activity. at this point areas of the cortex are not connected
- the major mechanism of consolidation making a memory more stable and more durable is reactivation which is when the hippocampus replays the memory. the hippocampus replays the neural activity associated with the memory. we see that the regions in the cortex are becoming connected. these cortical connection then become stronger so more long term when we try to retreive the memory we dont need the hippocampus
- according to the standard consolidation models when we retrieve something later on more remote memories when you do not need the Hippocampus
- Accounts for Ribot’s law - because if an individual has amnesia and amnesia has called all lesion a deficit in Hippocampus when you’re trying to retrieve those more remote memories you don’t need hippocampus to do that so that’s how this model would explain ribots law
Explanations of
retrograde amnesia (RA) -diagram in notes
- Multiple Trace Hypothesis e.g. Nadel & Moscovitch
(1997;1998)
(B) Multiple trace theory states that a
hippocampal-neocortical trace (left, blue
lines and red spheres) is always required
for a detailed episodic memory (middle,
blue lines and red spheres), with
repeated retrieval of this memory
increasing the number of these
permanent hippocampal traces (middle
and right, red spheres). The intrinsic
neocortical connectivity that emerges
over time (middle and right, green lines)
supports memories of a more factual and
semantic nature that have been derived
from repeated recall.
Taken from Barry & Maguire (2019)
the theory says that the hippocampus is not only important in encoding but also for long term retrieval of more remote memories. long term consolidation results in the creation of redundant traces in the hippocampus and that leads to multiple replicas of the experience. the older memories have more traces so are more robust against partial hippocampal damage
the theory says that the reason why people can remember those very early memories is because there are lots more connections in the hippocampus and some of them might be lost due to a lesion in the hippocampus but theres lots of them and lots of replicas of them and thats what enables you to remember those very early memories
older memories/ more remote ones can become more semantised and more factual so when we are trying to recall memories from the past sometimes these can be more like a narrative, a story rather than a episodic experience so we rely maybe more on semantic memories
differences in stimuli also explain the tempo gradient
Semantic memory
- Tulving (1989) selective deficit in episodic memory.
- At first sight, no; amnesics retain knowledge of vocab
and the world. - Semantic deficits can result from dementia but what
about damage to MTL? - H.M. tested on ability to retrieve lexical knowledge
(Kensinger et al., 2001). Picture naming, spelling, ability
to generate irregular word forms (e.g. Every day I dig a
hole. Yesterday I ____ a hole). Performed within 1 SD of
matched controls. - However, this knowledge acquired very early in life and
generally early childhood memories are found to be well
preserved in amnesic patients (Ribot’s law)
Semantic memory
- Some evidence for deficits in acquiring new semantic
knowledge in patients with MTL damage. - H.M. unable to define words introduced since the onset
of his amnesia e.g. Jacuzzi. - The amount of damage to MTL corresponds to the
magnitude of deficits in acquiring new semantic info
(Verfaellie et al., 2000). - H.M. can learn new info when it is anchored to
premorbidly acquired knowledge. However less
consistent access to semantic representations and
learning can decay after a relatively short period of time
(Skotko et al., 2004)
Semantic memory
Developmental amnesia. Relatively preserved acquisition of
semantic knowledge but profound episodic memory deficits
e.g. Dzieciol et al. (2017), N = 18. - a group of individuals who have deficits like Jon
- no real deficit in semantic memory compared to healthy controls but profound difficulties in episodic memory
* Why the difference? Because damage happens early in life is
there a functional reorganisation of the brain?
in amnesia its episodic memory thats profoundly affected and at least in developmental amnesia there doesnt seem to be a defect in semantic memory in those who acquire amnesia later in life. semantic memory is generally okay but there may be some subtle differences
Conclusions
- Studying amnesia is difficult: numerous causes and
can be complicated by other cognitive impairments. - Preserved functioning in STM, procedural memory
and implicit memory. - Severe deficit in episodic memory: particularly in
recollection if just the hippocampus is damaged? - The acquisition of new semantic information might
be impaired. - When examining patients we need to consider:
- the extent of the damage to brain structures.
- when the damage occurred.
- the way in which memory has been assessed
amnesia - the patient and the psychologist - the patients view
Amnesia – The Patient’s Perspective (Meltzer’s Case) — Summary for Revision
After suffering a heart attack and six-week coma, Meltzer awoke disoriented—he knew who he was and recognized family but thought he was 33 (actually 44).
He experienced widespread memory issues, including:
Semantic memory loss: forgot how to do everyday tasks (e.g., set alarm clock, pay bills).
Working memory problems: struggled to hold and organize information, making planning and comparisons difficult.
TV and films: hard to follow plots or remember teams in sports.
Spatial disorientation: frequently got lost, even in familiar areas.
Social Impacts:
Conversations were stressful due to:
Forgetting names, relationships, and personal history.
Risk of social faux pas (e.g., asking about someone who had passed away).
Forgetting what he meant to say mid-conversation.
Little recall of news or gossip, so he defaulted to talking about his condition, which made him feel boring.
Despite severe challenges, Meltzer made significant progress and eventually returned to work, providing a valuable first-person account of living with amnesia. His experience offers unique insight into the cognitive, emotional, and social consequences of memory loss.
the view from psychology
The View from Psychology – Summary for Revision
Cognitive psychologist Alan Baddeley recounts a conference where he attempted to explain human memory in 55 minutes. After his talk, a neuropsychologist asked:
“How does this help me with my patient on Monday?”
This question underscored the importance of linking cognitive theory to clinical application, a theme guiding much of his work.
How Patient Studies Have Advanced Memory Research:
Patient HM: Showed the distinction between short-term and long-term memory.
Patient PV: Helped uncover the structure of working memory, particularly the phonological loop.
Clinical cases have also informed our understanding of semantic and autobiographical memory.
Patients, despite knowing they may not directly benefit, are typically generous and motivated to help others through their participation in research.
Applying Cognitive Psychology to Clinical Work:
A clinician’s process when helping a memory-impaired patient typically involves:
Initial assessment: Discussing the patient’s and carer’s concerns and goals, managing expectations realistically (e.g., full memory recovery is unlikely).
Diagnostic evaluation:
Combines patient interviews, standardized cognitive tests, and neuroimaging.
Test scores are compared to norms to detect abnormalities and track progress.
Communication and planning:
Results guide treatment plans and are shared with other professionals.
Essential for tailoring rehabilitation strategies to the patient’s specific strengths and weaknesses.
Research contribution: Assessments help integrate lab-based cognitive psychology methods into real-world clinical settings.
Broader Clinical Context:
Patients often have multiple difficulties, not just memory loss (e.g., emotional, motor, perceptual), which must be considered in rehabilitation.
Two common causes of memory problems:
Alzheimer’s Disease (AD): Progressive decline, usually in older adults.
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI): Often affects younger individuals, leading to long-term memory problems.
Key Takeaway:
Cognitive psychology offers valuable insights and tools for clinical assessment and treatment of memory disorders. However, effective rehabilitation requires a multidisciplinary approach—beyond cognitive science alone—to address the full range of patient needs.
alzheimers disease
In 1907, Dr Alois Alzheimer first described the disease that bears his name. It is a devastating disease of the elderly with symptoms that vary but always include an increasingly severe deficit in episodic memory.
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most prominent but by no means the only cause of senile dementia (see Box 16.2). It does however comprise over 50% of dementia cases and occurs in about 10% of the population over the age of 65 with the rate increasing with age.
diagnosis
Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis – Summary for Revision
✅ Diagnostic Criteria:
Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is progressive and multifaceted.
Diagnosis requires:
A memory impairment plus
At least two other cognitive deficits (e.g., language, action control, perception, executive function).
Definitive diagnosis still relies on post-mortem brain analysis, identifying:
Amyloid plaques (clumps of toxic β-amyloid protein)
Neurofibrillary tangles (twisted microtubules caused by abnormal tau proteins)
⚠️ Amyloid Hypothesis Under Scrutiny:
Controversy: Plaques/tangles also appear in normal aging brains.
Some dementia cases lack both.
A 2019 update showed 74% of new drug trials focus on non-amyloid targets, marking a shift in research focus.
Progression and Cognitive Impact:
Disease begins in medial temporal lobes/hippocampus → memory issues.
Progresses to temporal, parietal, and other regions, causing varied deficits.
Despite variability, a core feature remains: impaired episodic memory (Salthouse & Becker, 1998).
🧠 Neuropsychological Profiles:
Studies (e.g., Baddeley et al., 1991) show diverse symptom patterns, yet memory loss is central and required for diagnosis.
Case Study – Iris Murdoch:
Famous novelist and philosopher diagnosed with AD.
Linguistic signs of decline:
Shorter sentences
Simpler vocabulary
Circumlocutions (e.g., “bus” = “something carried along”)
Poor spelling (e.g., “cruise” → “crewes”)
Difficulty naming pictures or producing words in categories
Illustrates how language impairment worsens with progression.
Emotional and Social Impact:
AD can lead to emotional distress in caregivers.
Patients may lose aspects of their social personality—e.g., a spouse may say, “This is not the person I married.”
However, some (like Murdoch) may retain a pleasant demeanor.
✅ Key Takeaways:
Episodic memory loss is essential for diagnosis.
AD shows a progressive cognitive decline, often beginning subtly.
While plaques and tangles are central to diagnosis, the amyloid theory is no longer dominant.
AD affects memory, language, and personality, with serious emotional consequences for families.
episodic memory
Ru the time AD has been reliably diagnosed, patients are likely to show a substantial deficit in episodic
memory whether measured by recall or recognition, using verbal or visual material or based on measures of everyday memory (Greene, Hodges & Baddeley, 1995; Spinner, Della Sala, Bandera, & Baddeley,
1988). As in the classic amnesic syndrome, the recency effect in free recall is relatively well preserved, although performance on earlier items is grossly impaired. There is evidence that as the disease progresses even recency tends to decline (Miller, 1971).
forgetting
orgetting in Alzheimer’s Disease – Revision Summary
✅ Forgetting Rate:
Although AD patients struggle to learn new information, once learned, they do not forget it faster than healthy elderly individuals.
Study: Kopelman (1985)
Used picture recognition (a strong memory task).
Exposure time adjusted to equalize initial recall across groups (AD, healthy elderly, young).
After 24 hours: No significant difference in forgetting rate between groups.
🧠 Semantic Memory Decline:
Semantic memory (general knowledge about the world) declines steadily in AD as disease progresses.
Hodges et al. developed tasks to isolate semantic deficits from perceptual or language issues:
Naming pictured objects/animals
Selecting a picture when given a name
Describing features of items (e.g., “Do elephants have floppy ears?”)
Decline correlates with temporal lobe atrophy.
🧠 Semantic Dementia vs. AD:
Semantic dementia shows:
Severe semantic memory loss
Relatively preserved episodic memory
Atrophy focused in the left temporal lobe
In contrast, AD’s semantic loss is slower and typically involves medial temporal lobe damage.
✅ Key Takeaways:
Retention of learned information in AD can be comparable to normal aging.
Semantic memory deteriorates progressively, especially with temporal lobe damage.
Semantic dementia presents a contrasting pattern to AD, helping differentiate the two conditions.