lecture 20 - amnesia Flashcards

(40 cards)

1
Q

Overview

A
  • Types of amnesia: anterograde and retrograde amnesia.
  • Causes.
  • What is preserved?
  • Episodic memory
  • Anterograde amnesia and recollection and
    familiarity.
  • Retrograde amnesia and a temporal gradient.
  • Semantic memory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Studying amnesia

A
  • Disorders of memory with preserved intellect and
    language. Severe forgetfulness.
  • Difficult to keep a job, maintain relationships, look after
    oneself and maintain an independent existence.
  • Anterograde amnesia – a problem in encoding, storing or
    retrieving information that can be used in the future
    (antero).
  • Retrograde amnesia – a problem accessing events that
    happened in the past.

can look at amnesia from a cognitive perspective when we are interested in the cognitive deficits a individual has and we can also look at biological perspective where we are interested in Anatomical localisation. here the anatomical localisation is more important. also patient perspective when were interested in understanding a specific clinical condition. they can also be integration of those approaches aswell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Causes of amnesia

A
  • Alzheimer’s disease (AD): most common cause of amnesia. Not a pure form of amnesia because usually complicated by additional symptoms of dementia - issues with langauge, thinking and problem solving. its a degenerative brain disorder often in older individuals
  • Korsakoff syndrome: usually from chronic alcoholism and is mainly characterised by a memory impairment. Frequently studied, relatively pure form of amnesia. - due to lack of thymine - leads to specific deficits in memory
  • Herpes simplex encephalitis: a virus of the brain which can
    leave individuals severely amnesic. Very rare. E.g. Clive Wearing.
  • Temporal lobe surgery: individuals become amnesic as a result of deliberate surgical procedures. E.g. H.M.

for top two causes the onset of amnesia can be quite gradual but for the bottom two there is a precise moment of onset when the amnesia becomes apparent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

H.M.: Henry Molaison

A
  • Epileptic seizures at 10.
  • Quality of life extremely poor, surgery at 27.
  • Removal of the MTL (medial temporal lobes), including the hippocampi.
  • Good news – no more seizures; bad news – profound memory problems.
  • Several decades after op it was observed that H.M.: “does not know where he lives, who cares for him, or where he ate his last meal. His guesses as to the current year may be off by as much as 43 years… In 1982 he did not recognise a picture of himself taken on his 40th birthday in 1966”(Corkin, 1984, p.255)

the study of HM has been critical in psychology and it was the first evidence that the hippocampus is critical to memory
12,000 papers mentioned HM

  • Anterograde deficit extremely severe. - the key problem he has
  • Retrograde deficit extends back to age 16
    (11 years before surgery).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is preserved?

A

Short-term memory e.g. digit span (Baddeley & Warrington,
1970). - HM could a number in his for 15 minutes through constant rehearsal but a minute or two after stopping has no recollection of the number and doesnt remember being asked to remember a number = anterograde amnesia

  • Procedural memory e.g. mirror drawing task (Corkin, 1968).
  • can’t see hand but can see it in a mirror and you trace around a shape
  • the black dots are those with korsocoff syndrome and rest are healthy controls
  • the lines are very similar in terms of learning
    Mirror-reading, 3 daily sessions
    and retention 3 months
    later. Cohen & Squire
    (1980).

there doesnt seem to be any difficulties with procedural memory in amnesia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is preserved?

A

Implicit memory: a person’s behaviour is influenced by a
previous experience despite not being consciously aware of it.

  • Claparede (1911) handshake. - would handshake his amnesic patients hands on his ward rounds. one day put a pin in his hand and shook patients hands and next day when went to shake hand patient refused but she couldn’t explicitly say why. shows some implicit memory
  • Warrington & Weiskrantz (1968) degraded pictures/words.
    Same stimuli at a later time - marked improvement. Same for
    H.M. (Milner et al., 1968). shows ability to learn implicitly
  • Graf et al. (1984) given a list of words to read
    (e.g. METAL). Either asked to recall the word
    shown previously (explicit) or generate the
    first word that comes to mind (implicit) e.g.
    ME___. Only explicit impaired, implicit
    normal for individuals with amnesia.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Episodic memory - severely affected in amnesia

A

Typically episodic memory tasks use free-recall or recognition.
* According to dual-process models of memory two distinct bases for memory performance: ? familiarisation and recollection
recollection = when you can remember some contextual or some source details from the study or the learning episode
familiarisation = you recognise you have seen something before but can’t remember the contextual details

to do a free recall task you need recollection and for a recognition task you could use recollection or familiarity

  • How do these map onto the two tasks?
    Performance on the
    Doors and People
    test by Jon and 2
    controls. Baddeley
    et al. (2001) Jon was born prematurely and had breathing problems as a result of anoxia and this causes substantial damage to the hippocampus. Jons hippocampus is around less than half the size that it would normally be and its atypical in structure so Jon is a developmental amnesic. he is compared to two healthy controls

line on graph = population average
for Jon there is no real evidence of any deficits in the recognition task however for the recall task John has a profound impairment compared to the healthy controls and population average. Jon seems to have problems with recall specifically recollection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Recollection and familiarity: Jon

A
  • Jon. Problems teaching him the R/K distinction.
  • a remember response would indicate that you have seen the item before and you can recall some contextual info
  • a know response should be given when you recognise that you’ve seen something before but cannot recover contextual info
  • After he declared he understood. He was tested.
  • Used R/K categories as often as controls but unable to
    explain the basis of his R decisions.
  • Used a strength rather than a recollective criterion.
  • used the left parietal ERP old/new effect
  • Lacked the ‘remember’ component in an ERP study of
    memory (Duzel et al., 2001).
  • Jon is fine for the process of familiarity
  • his score is much lower for recollection
  • Same deficit using a different task (PDP)
                Recollection Familiarity Controls  0.41 (0.23).      0.47 (0.2) Jon           0.10                  0.50
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Recollection and familiarity:
Hypoxic patients

A

Yonelinas et al. (2002). 56 cardiac arrest patients who had suffered mild hypoxia when there is insufficient oxygen to brain and results in deficits In the hippocampus, 55
healthy controls.

hypoxia ptp have Greater deficit in recall.

graph
for RK paradigm
C = controls, H = Hypoxic, H+ = other
patients with hippocampal and other
medial temporal lobe (MTL) damage.
- for index of familiarity the hypoxic patients have lots of varaiblity but doenst seem to be a deficit in familiarity but for index of recollection they have profound problems with recollection
- for H+ individuals this leads to problems for recollection and familiarity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Dual-process model of memory

A

Aggleton & Brown (1999)
Hippocampus is critical for – recollection
Perirhinal regions critical for - familiarity

A controversial area
There are hippocampal amnesics who have deficits
in recall and recognition. e.g. papers by Squire.
Also dispute as to whether there are two
processes: R & F or whether they just reflect strong versus weak memory traces.
research in previous lectures suggest that recollection and familiarity are two separate things

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Retrograde amnesia - when individuals have problems and deficit in recalling past events - things prior to onset of amnesia

A
  • Need to test items learned prior to the onset of amnesia.
    Researcher has no control over the learning. we dont know what the individual has learnt and how well they have learnt it.
  • Scales have been developed to test a range of events:
    news, winners of classic horse races, TV shows…
  • Probe method: give someone a cue eg river (recall a personal memory and then
    date it).
  • Koppelman et al. (1990) developed the Autobiographical
    Memory Interview (AMI). Ask participants to remember
    specific information from a range of time periods e.g. the
    name of their first school. Then recollect a specific
    personal event from the period.

they try to score up the amount of episodic info within those memories and the specificity of the memory

when we are trying to test retrograde amnesia and what the individual knew before the onset of amnesia it can be quite difficult to measure those things

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Temporal retrograde
amnesia gradient

A
  • For those with retrograde amnesia memories from earlier
    in life are easier to recall than those later on (= Ribot’s
    law).
  • Butters & Cermak (1986) report the case of P.Z. - who was a distinguished experimental psychologist who completed their memoirs before they got korsocoff syndrome. we can test their memory as we have their memoir where they had recounted details from their life so can identify events and facts the individual did know prior to the onset of their amnesia

found that memories from earlier in life are recalled far better than those that happened more recently = ribots law

Looks like an acute onset of amnesia. However PZ had a history of alcohol
abuse going back 35 years, could there be a progressive impairment in
ability to register new memories? its very hard to retrieve something if you had an impaired ability to get that into your memory eg didnt encode it in a deeper manner to allow you to remember it better later on

PZ wrote a memoir prior to onset of amnesia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explanations of retrograde
amnesia (RA) - diagram in notes

A
  • Standard consolidation models e.g. Alvarez & Squire
    (1994)
  • Assume information is consolidated by transferring it
    from one brain region to another (i.e. system
    consolidation).
  • information coming in activates a number of areas in the cortex and its distributed across the cortex as when we have an experience it usuallly involves many sensory and cognitive areas so there may be sights, sounds, smells, emotions. initially when we are experiencing this its going to activate these different cortical areas and the hippocampus coordinates this activity. at this point areas of the cortex are not connected
  • the major mechanism of consolidation making a memory more stable and more durable is reactivation which is when the hippocampus replays the memory. the hippocampus replays the neural activity associated with the memory. we see that the regions in the cortex are becoming connected. these cortical connection then become stronger so more long term when we try to retreive the memory we dont need the hippocampus
  • according to the standard consolidation models when we retrieve something later on more remote memories when you do not need the Hippocampus
  • Accounts for Ribot’s law - because if an individual has amnesia and amnesia has called all lesion a deficit in Hippocampus when you’re trying to retrieve those more remote memories you don’t need hippocampus to do that so that’s how this model would explain ribots law
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explanations of
retrograde amnesia (RA) -diagram in notes

A
  • Multiple Trace Hypothesis e.g. Nadel & Moscovitch
    (1997;1998)

(B) Multiple trace theory states that a
hippocampal-neocortical trace (left, blue
lines and red spheres) is always required
for a detailed episodic memory (middle,
blue lines and red spheres), with
repeated retrieval of this memory
increasing the number of these
permanent hippocampal traces (middle
and right, red spheres). The intrinsic
neocortical connectivity that emerges
over time (middle and right, green lines)
supports memories of a more factual and
semantic nature that have been derived
from repeated recall.
Taken from Barry & Maguire (2019)

the theory says that the hippocampus is not only important in encoding but also for long term retrieval of more remote memories. long term consolidation results in the creation of redundant traces in the hippocampus and that leads to multiple replicas of the experience. the older memories have more traces so are more robust against partial hippocampal damage

the theory says that the reason why people can remember those very early memories is because there are lots more connections in the hippocampus and some of them might be lost due to a lesion in the hippocampus but theres lots of them and lots of replicas of them and thats what enables you to remember those very early memories

older memories/ more remote ones can become more semantised and more factual so when we are trying to recall memories from the past sometimes these can be more like a narrative, a story rather than a episodic experience so we rely maybe more on semantic memories

differences in stimuli also explain the tempo gradient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Semantic memory

A
  • Tulving (1989) selective deficit in episodic memory.
  • At first sight, no; amnesics retain knowledge of vocab
    and the world.
  • Semantic deficits can result from dementia but what
    about damage to MTL?
  • H.M. tested on ability to retrieve lexical knowledge
    (Kensinger et al., 2001). Picture naming, spelling, ability
    to generate irregular word forms (e.g. Every day I dig a
    hole. Yesterday I ____ a hole). Performed within 1 SD of
    matched controls.
  • However, this knowledge acquired very early in life and
    generally early childhood memories are found to be well
    preserved in amnesic patients (Ribot’s law)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Semantic memory

A
  • Some evidence for deficits in acquiring new semantic
    knowledge in patients with MTL damage.
  • H.M. unable to define words introduced since the onset
    of his amnesia e.g. Jacuzzi.
  • The amount of damage to MTL corresponds to the
    magnitude of deficits in acquiring new semantic info
    (Verfaellie et al., 2000).
  • H.M. can learn new info when it is anchored to
    premorbidly acquired knowledge. However less
    consistent access to semantic representations and
    learning can decay after a relatively short period of time
    (Skotko et al., 2004)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Semantic memory

A

Developmental amnesia. Relatively preserved acquisition of
semantic knowledge but profound episodic memory deficits
e.g. Dzieciol et al. (2017), N = 18. - a group of individuals who have deficits like Jon
- no real deficit in semantic memory compared to healthy controls but profound difficulties in episodic memory
* Why the difference? Because damage happens early in life is
there a functional reorganisation of the brain?

in amnesia its episodic memory thats profoundly affected and at least in developmental amnesia there doesnt seem to be a defect in semantic memory in those who acquire amnesia later in life. semantic memory is generally okay but there may be some subtle differences

18
Q

Conclusions

A
  • Studying amnesia is difficult: numerous causes and
    can be complicated by other cognitive impairments.
  • Preserved functioning in STM, procedural memory
    and implicit memory.
  • Severe deficit in episodic memory: particularly in
    recollection if just the hippocampus is damaged?
  • The acquisition of new semantic information might
    be impaired.
  • When examining patients we need to consider:
  • the extent of the damage to brain structures.
  • when the damage occurred.
  • the way in which memory has been assessed
19
Q

amnesia - the patient and the psychologist - the patients view

A

Amnesia – The Patient’s Perspective (Meltzer’s Case) — Summary for Revision
After suffering a heart attack and six-week coma, Meltzer awoke disoriented—he knew who he was and recognized family but thought he was 33 (actually 44).

He experienced widespread memory issues, including:

Semantic memory loss: forgot how to do everyday tasks (e.g., set alarm clock, pay bills).
Working memory problems: struggled to hold and organize information, making planning and comparisons difficult.
TV and films: hard to follow plots or remember teams in sports.
Spatial disorientation: frequently got lost, even in familiar areas.
Social Impacts:
Conversations were stressful due to:
Forgetting names, relationships, and personal history.
Risk of social faux pas (e.g., asking about someone who had passed away).
Forgetting what he meant to say mid-conversation.
Little recall of news or gossip, so he defaulted to talking about his condition, which made him feel boring.
Despite severe challenges, Meltzer made significant progress and eventually returned to work, providing a valuable first-person account of living with amnesia. His experience offers unique insight into the cognitive, emotional, and social consequences of memory loss.

20
Q

the view from psychology

A

The View from Psychology – Summary for Revision
Cognitive psychologist Alan Baddeley recounts a conference where he attempted to explain human memory in 55 minutes. After his talk, a neuropsychologist asked:
“How does this help me with my patient on Monday?”
This question underscored the importance of linking cognitive theory to clinical application, a theme guiding much of his work.

How Patient Studies Have Advanced Memory Research:
Patient HM: Showed the distinction between short-term and long-term memory.
Patient PV: Helped uncover the structure of working memory, particularly the phonological loop.
Clinical cases have also informed our understanding of semantic and autobiographical memory.
Patients, despite knowing they may not directly benefit, are typically generous and motivated to help others through their participation in research.

Applying Cognitive Psychology to Clinical Work:
A clinician’s process when helping a memory-impaired patient typically involves:

Initial assessment: Discussing the patient’s and carer’s concerns and goals, managing expectations realistically (e.g., full memory recovery is unlikely).
Diagnostic evaluation:
Combines patient interviews, standardized cognitive tests, and neuroimaging.
Test scores are compared to norms to detect abnormalities and track progress.
Communication and planning:
Results guide treatment plans and are shared with other professionals.
Essential for tailoring rehabilitation strategies to the patient’s specific strengths and weaknesses.
Research contribution: Assessments help integrate lab-based cognitive psychology methods into real-world clinical settings.
Broader Clinical Context:
Patients often have multiple difficulties, not just memory loss (e.g., emotional, motor, perceptual), which must be considered in rehabilitation.
Two common causes of memory problems:
Alzheimer’s Disease (AD): Progressive decline, usually in older adults.
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI): Often affects younger individuals, leading to long-term memory problems.
Key Takeaway:
Cognitive psychology offers valuable insights and tools for clinical assessment and treatment of memory disorders. However, effective rehabilitation requires a multidisciplinary approach—beyond cognitive science alone—to address the full range of patient needs.

21
Q

alzheimers disease

A

In 1907, Dr Alois Alzheimer first described the disease that bears his name. It is a devastating disease of the elderly with symptoms that vary but always include an increasingly severe deficit in episodic memory.
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most prominent but by no means the only cause of senile dementia (see Box 16.2). It does however comprise over 50% of dementia cases and occurs in about 10% of the population over the age of 65 with the rate increasing with age.

22
Q

diagnosis

A

Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis – Summary for Revision
✅ Diagnostic Criteria:

Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is progressive and multifaceted.
Diagnosis requires:
A memory impairment plus
At least two other cognitive deficits (e.g., language, action control, perception, executive function).
Definitive diagnosis still relies on post-mortem brain analysis, identifying:
Amyloid plaques (clumps of toxic β-amyloid protein)
Neurofibrillary tangles (twisted microtubules caused by abnormal tau proteins)
⚠️ Amyloid Hypothesis Under Scrutiny:

Controversy: Plaques/tangles also appear in normal aging brains.
Some dementia cases lack both.
A 2019 update showed 74% of new drug trials focus on non-amyloid targets, marking a shift in research focus.
Progression and Cognitive Impact:
Disease begins in medial temporal lobes/hippocampus → memory issues.
Progresses to temporal, parietal, and other regions, causing varied deficits.
Despite variability, a core feature remains: impaired episodic memory (Salthouse & Becker, 1998).
🧠 Neuropsychological Profiles:

Studies (e.g., Baddeley et al., 1991) show diverse symptom patterns, yet memory loss is central and required for diagnosis.
Case Study – Iris Murdoch:
Famous novelist and philosopher diagnosed with AD.
Linguistic signs of decline:
Shorter sentences
Simpler vocabulary
Circumlocutions (e.g., “bus” = “something carried along”)
Poor spelling (e.g., “cruise” → “crewes”)
Difficulty naming pictures or producing words in categories
Illustrates how language impairment worsens with progression.
Emotional and Social Impact:
AD can lead to emotional distress in caregivers.
Patients may lose aspects of their social personality—e.g., a spouse may say, “This is not the person I married.”
However, some (like Murdoch) may retain a pleasant demeanor.
✅ Key Takeaways:
Episodic memory loss is essential for diagnosis.
AD shows a progressive cognitive decline, often beginning subtly.
While plaques and tangles are central to diagnosis, the amyloid theory is no longer dominant.
AD affects memory, language, and personality, with serious emotional consequences for families.

23
Q

episodic memory

A

Ru the time AD has been reliably diagnosed, patients are likely to show a substantial deficit in episodic
memory whether measured by recall or recognition, using verbal or visual material or based on measures of everyday memory (Greene, Hodges & Baddeley, 1995; Spinner, Della Sala, Bandera, & Baddeley,
1988). As in the classic amnesic syndrome, the recency effect in free recall is relatively well preserved, although performance on earlier items is grossly impaired. There is evidence that as the disease progresses even recency tends to decline (Miller, 1971).

24
Q

forgetting

A

orgetting in Alzheimer’s Disease – Revision Summary
✅ Forgetting Rate:

Although AD patients struggle to learn new information, once learned, they do not forget it faster than healthy elderly individuals.
Study: Kopelman (1985)
Used picture recognition (a strong memory task).
Exposure time adjusted to equalize initial recall across groups (AD, healthy elderly, young).
After 24 hours: No significant difference in forgetting rate between groups.
🧠 Semantic Memory Decline:
Semantic memory (general knowledge about the world) declines steadily in AD as disease progresses.
Hodges et al. developed tasks to isolate semantic deficits from perceptual or language issues:
Naming pictured objects/animals
Selecting a picture when given a name
Describing features of items (e.g., “Do elephants have floppy ears?”)
Decline correlates with temporal lobe atrophy.
🧠 Semantic Dementia vs. AD:
Semantic dementia shows:
Severe semantic memory loss
Relatively preserved episodic memory
Atrophy focused in the left temporal lobe
In contrast, AD’s semantic loss is slower and typically involves medial temporal lobe damage.
✅ Key Takeaways:
Retention of learned information in AD can be comparable to normal aging.
Semantic memory deteriorates progressively, especially with temporal lobe damage.
Semantic dementia presents a contrasting pattern to AD, helping differentiate the two conditions.

25
implicit memory
mplicit Memory in Alzheimer’s Disease – Revision Summary ✅ Overview: Implicit memory involves unconscious learning and is supported by multiple brain systems. In AD, performance is mixed across different types of implicit tasks. ✳️ Preserved Implicit Memory (Simple, Automatic Tasks): Pursuit Rotor Task: AD patients initially perform worse. But improve at the same rate as elderly controls (Heindel et al., 1989). Mirror-Reversed Reading: Little impairment in learning rate (Moscovitch, 1982). Lexical Decision Priming: AD patients show normal priming effects when judging whether letter strings are real words (Fleischman et al., 1997). ❌ Impaired Implicit Memory (More Complex Tasks): Stem Completion Task (e.g., seeing "stamp" then guessing “st___”): AD patients show reduced priming, unlike patients with classic amnesia. Associative Priming Tasks: Impaired when cues require more controlled processing or association-based retrieval (Salmon & Heindel, 1992; Salmon et al., 1988). ✅ Key Takeaways: AD patients show: Intact implicit memory on automatic or perceptual tasks. Impaired performance on semantic or effortful implicit tasks. This suggests that different implicit systems are differentially affected by AD.
26
working memory in alzheimers disease
Working Memory in Alzheimer’s Disease – Summary 🔹 General Working Memory Deficits Less severe than episodic memory loss. Modest but consistent impairments on: Digit Span (verbal WM). Corsi Block Tapping (visuo-spatial WM) (Spinnler et al., 1988). 🔹 Maintenance and Rehearsal Deficits Simple maintenance (e.g., rehearsal without interference) remains intact. When articulatory suppression is introduced: AD patients show rapid forgetting. Healthy elderly only decline with difficult tasks like counting backward (Morris, 1986; Morris & Baddeley, 1988). Suggests automatic rehearsal is preserved, but complex/attentional rehearsal is impaired. 🔹 Dual-Task Executive Deficits Tested via simultaneous memory and tracking tasks (Baddeley et al., 1986). Tasks were adjusted to equal difficulty across AD, elderly, and young groups. Under dual-task conditions: Young and elderly: Small decline. AD patients: Large performance drop, worsening with disease progression. Deficit not due to difficulty, but inability to coordinate tasks (Logie et al., 2004). Diagnostic value: Dual-task impairments can help differentiate AD from normal aging. 🔹 Visual Working Memory & Feature Binding Deficit Parra et al. (2009, 2010): AD patients have a specific deficit in binding visual features (e.g., color + shape). Found in: Typical AD. Presymptomatic familial AD (Colombian sample with genetic risk). High potential as an early diagnostic marker. 🔹 Other Attention Processes Sustained attention (vigilance) remains relatively spared in AD (Perry & Hodges, 1999). ✅ Key Takeaways WM in AD is impaired, especially under attention-demanding conditions. Dual-task and feature binding tests are promising tools for early diagnosis. AD affects executive coordination, not just memory storage.
27
treatment
reatment of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) – Summary 💊 Pharmacological Treatments Three cholinesterase inhibitors slow progression modestly: Donepezil Rivastigmine Galantamine These prevent breakdown of acetylcholine, which is depleted in AD (Doody et al., 2001). Despite intense research, no cure has been found yet. Amyloid-based drug trials have largely failed; 74% of current trials target non-amyloid mechanisms (Neuro Central, 2019). 🧠 Psychological and Behavioral Approaches Growing interest in emotional and social support for both patients and carers. Cognitive decline is distressing, but changes in personality and relationships can be even more so. ✅ Behavioral Interventions Memory aids: Calendars, message boards to reduce repetitive questioning. Environmental adjustments: e.g., training patients to keep key items (e.g., glasses, pipe) in a bright bag (Moffat, 1989). Memory training programs (e.g., Spector et al., 2000): Improve trained skills. May reduce depression. Limited generalisation to untrained tasks. 🧠 Psychotherapeutic & Emotional Support Psychotherapy shows some promise, but cost-effectiveness is uncertain (Benbow & Sharman, 2014; Orgeta et al., 2015). Training carers improves quality of care and helps manage frustration from patient behaviours like repetitive questioning (Clare, 2017). 📚 Identity-Oriented Interventions Reality Orientation Therapy (ROT): Reorients patient to time/place. Can reduce confusion, but may upset patients who prefer pleasant delusions. Reminiscence Therapy: Builds life story books using photos and mementos. Enhances personal identity and social connection. Promotes more natural interactions with carers and therapists (Woods & McKiernan, 2005). ✅ Key Takeaways Current treatments aim to slow progression, not cure. Non-drug approaches like behavioural training, environmental support, and identity therapy are vital. Support for carers is as crucial as treatment for patients. Best future hope lies in new pharmacological targets, but quality of life support remains essential now.
28
traumatic Brain injury
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and Memory – Summary 💥 What Is TBI? Caused by head impact or sudden acceleration/deceleration (e.g., car crashes). Leads to: Brain movement inside skull. Damage from bony projections. Shearing/twisting of brain fibres. 📊 Prevalence Common in young men. UK: >95% survive with varying handicaps. US: ~5.3 million living with TBI effects (Langlois et al., 2006). Other causes: Falls, sports injuries, war blast injuries (10–20% of returnees affected). 🧠 Cognitive Consequences Can include social, emotional, and cognitive difficulties. Focus here: Attention and memory deficits. 🏥 Coma and Recovery Severe TBI → possible coma for weeks. Persistent vegetative state may occur in worst cases (ethical dilemmas re: life support). Most recover gradually, often with subtle signs. 🩺 WHIM Scale (Wessex Head Injury Matrix – Shiel et al., 2000) Tracks micro-recoveries in behaviour. Essential for monitoring recovery from serious brain trauma. 🧠 Memory Impairment Episodic memory most affected. Even non-amnesic TBI patients often experience some degree of episodic memory loss. The classic amnesic syndrome (pure episodic impairment) provides a clear model of the challenges TBI patients may face to varying degrees. ✅ Key Takeaways TBI leads to a wide range of cognitive impairments, especially episodic memory loss. Monitoring recovery requires sensitive tools (e.g., WHIM). Though recovery is possible, support and long-term care are often needed. TBI in veterans, athletes, and accident survivors poses ongoing clinical and ethical challenges.
29
episodic memory impairment - anterograde amnesia
Episodic Memory Impairment: Anterograde Amnesia 📌 Key Definitions Anterograde amnesia: Inability to form new memories after onset of condition. Retrograde amnesia: Loss of access to pre-existing memories before onset. 📖 Classic Cases HM: Severe anterograde amnesia, preserved past memories. Clive Wearing: Severe anterograde + retrograde amnesia, especially fragmented autobiographical memory. 👨‍⚕️ Case Study: "Keith" (Wilson & Baddeley, 1988) Highly intelligent (IQ 134) with pure episodic memory deficit. Preserved: Working memory (normal digit span, Corsi block span). Procedural memory (mirror reading, pursuit rotor). Semantic memory and autobiographical memory from before illness. Impaired: Delayed recall: Zero memory of stories or figures after 40+ minutes. Episodic memory: Free recall showed normal recency but poor long-term retention. ✅ Keith = textbook case of dense anterograde amnesia. 🧪 Theoretical Explanations (Psychological Level) Interference/retrieval deficit (Warrington & Weiskrantz, 1970). Faster forgetting (Huppert & Piercy, 1979). Shallow processing (Cermak et al., 1974). ⚠️ These theories have limitations, but may still contribute partially in some patients. 🧠 Role of Contextual Binding Hippocampus is key in linking event + context (time, place). Without this link, specific memories can't be retrieved. 🔬 Supporting Research Winocur & Mills (1970): Rats with hippocampal lesions struggled to use context in spatial learning. Place cells (O'Keefe, 1976) and time cells (Eichenbaum, 2014) = hippocampus encodes when and where events happen. Source memory deficits: Amnesics may remember a fact but forget how or when they learned it (Schacter et al., 1984). ⏳ Mental Time Travel Tulving: Episodic memory = "mental time travel". Amnesics struggle to recall the past and to imagine future events (Hassabis et al., 2007). Can imagine components (e.g., palm trees, sand) but fail to integrate into coherent scenes. Suggests hippocampus supports both memory and imagination through spatial/contextual integration. ✅ Summary Takeaways Anterograde amnesia severely impairs new episodic memory formation. Semantic, procedural, and working memory may remain intact. The hippocampus is crucial for contextual encoding, source memory, and mental time travel. Understanding amnesia informs treatment, rehabilitation, and theories of how memory works.
30
a simplified model
A Simplified Model of Amnesia – Alan Baddeley’s "Modal Model" 📌 Initial Proposal: The Modal Model (Baddeley, 1990) Episodic memory depends on binding items to context via a “mnemonic glue” (unspecified neural mechanism). Memory trace = item + context → enables retrieval. Semantic memory builds from accumulated episodes (general knowledge = residue of many specific memories). Recall and recognition assumed to rely on the same underlying storage system. Model was conceptual, not biologically grounded. 🔍 The Challenge: Jon’s Case Jon: A young man with developmental amnesia due to early hippocampal damage. Findings: Severe episodic memory deficit. Good semantic memory (e.g., discusses politics, knows “Discworld” novels). High IQ, good vocabulary, and solid academic abilities. Preserved recall, impaired recognition – opposite of typical adult amnesic pattern. 🤯 Why This Is a Problem: According to the modal model: Semantic memory should be impaired if episodic memory is necessary to build it. Recall ≈ Recognition — but Jon's case shows a clear difference. Jon contradicts both assumptions of the model. 🧠 Revisiting the Theory Recollection vs. Familiarity (see Chapter 8): Jon used “remember” judgments based on clarity of mental images, not true recollection. Suggests Jon relied on familiarity-based recognition rather than full episodic recall. Supported by neuroimaging differences (Maguire et al., 2001). 🧩 A New Proposal: Baddeley suggests: Hippocampus = key for attaching time and place cues to experiences. Other medial temporal lobe structures = may form the memory, but without the hippocampus, episodic tagging fails. Semantic learning can still occur (just more slowly) via repetition and generalization, even without full episodic memory. 👶 Developmental vs. Adult-Onset Amnesia Developmental amnesics (e.g., Jon) often have: Good IQ, working memory, and above-average semantic knowledge. Poor episodic memory. Possibly due to greater brain plasticity in early life. Adult cases with hippocampal damage typically show deficits in both recognition and recall (Squire et al., 1999). ✅ Summary Takeaways: Baddeley’s modal model provided a useful starting point but had key assumptions challenged by developmental cases like Jon’s. Jon showed: Impaired episodic memory, Preserved semantic memory, Atypical recall > recognition pattern. Suggests that: Episodic memory = hippocampus + contextual binding. Semantic memory can still develop independently over time. Early brain damage may be partially compensated by developmental plasticity.
31
consolidation
ChatGPT said: Consolidation and Amnesia Consolidation, the process by which initially fragile memory traces become more resistant to forgetting over time, is central to understanding both anterograde and retrograde amnesia. This concept, first proposed over a century ago (Müller & Pilzecker, 1900), suggests that consolidation depends on the hippocampus and related areas, with disruption to these systems impairing memory retention. Research supports the role of consolidation in learning, notably studies on sleep. For example, learning followed by sleep leads to better long-term retention than staying awake (Gaskell & Dumay, 2003; Stickgold et al., 2000). Further evidence from Sergio Della Sala's group shows that amnesic patients' memory retention improves when learning is followed by a quiet, interference-free period. In one study, amnesic patients performed better in a darkened room than when distracted by cognitive tasks (Dewar et al., 2010). Similar improvements were seen in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients, but not in healthy controls. These findings suggest that amnesic patients are particularly vulnerable to disruption of consolidation, especially early in the process. A study by Dewar et al. (2009) found that MCI patients were more susceptible to forgetting when there was an early disruption, with a greater impact the sooner the disruption occurred. The hippocampal consolidation process likely involves cellular mechanisms like long-term potentiation (LTP), though subcellular analysis of amnesia remains limited. This research underscores the importance of consolidation in memory retention and offers potential for improving therapeutic approaches for memory disorders.
32
retrograde amnesia
Retrograde Amnesia Retrograde amnesia involves the inability to retrieve old memories, in contrast to anterograde amnesia, which affects the ability to form new memories. Patients often experience both, but the severity of one does not correlate with the other, indicating different causes (Greene & Hodges, 1996; Shimamura & Squire, 1991). For instance, two patients with severe amnesia displayed high intelligence, but one had vivid memories of his past, while the other struggled to recall basic details, such as the order of events in his life. Measuring retrograde amnesia is challenging because it involves memories formed long before testing. Sanders and Warrington (1971) attempted to quantify this by showing patients famous photographs from different time periods, finding that patients performed worse than controls and that older memories were better preserved, as per Ribot’s law (1882). Many subsequent studies have used similar methods involving news events or popular culture, but these are limited by the variability of participants' prior knowledge and the need for constant updating. An alternative approach is to probe autobiographical memory, asking patients to recall life events, which can be verified by others (Zola-Morgan et al., 1983). However, this is time-consuming. To address this, Kopelman et al. (1990) developed the Autobiographical Memory Interview (AMI), which asks patients to recall specific details from different life periods. This method was validated and found reliable, even for patients with Korsakoff syndrome, who either accurately recalled events or admitted to forgetting them. Despite its reliability, retrograde amnesia can manifest differently. Some patients, like an Italian woman described by De Renzi et al. (1987), may retain personal memories but forget public events, while others, like a Korsakoff patient in a study by Dalla Barba et al. (1990), may excel in recalling famous events but fail to remember personal ones. It's essential to distinguish neurological retrograde amnesia from psychogenic amnesia, which is typically temporary and stress-related (see Chapter 10). The patterns of memory loss differ, with neurological patients showing persistent impairment over time, while psychogenic amnesia often resolves after recovery.
33
confabulation
Confabulation Confabulation is the unintentional creation of false autobiographical information, typically to fill gaps in memory, without any intent to mislead. It can be categorized into two types: spontaneous and provoked. Provoked confabulation happens when an amnesic patient tries to fill in a memory gap, often to avoid embarrassment, which is somewhat similar to normal behavior when we unconsciously add details to a story. Spontaneous confabulation, however, is more vivid, less common, and often linked to frontal lobe damage. For example, a patient (RR) with extensive bilateral frontal lobe damage from a driving accident (Baddeley & Wilson, 1988) provided a detailed but completely fabricated account of the accident. He described a conversation with the truck driver, despite being unconscious at the time, and claimed he had driven himself to a rehabilitation center, which was not possible. Confabulation can extend to actions as well; RR was once found pushing another patient in a wheelchair, claiming to show him a sewage farm project he had worked on years ago. Confabulation is typically associated with dysexecutive syndrome, which results from damage to the frontal lobes and disrupts the central executive component of working memory (see Chapter 4, p. 82). This impairment affects autobiographical memory in two ways. First, patients have trouble generating proper retrieval cues. For instance, RR struggled to come up with items from categories unless given specific prompts. Second, they have difficulty evaluating the plausibility of the memories they retrieve, often accepting and elaborating on implausible details. In an autobiographical memory study, RR confabulated a story about sending a letter to his aunt about his brother’s death, even when reminded that his brother was alive, and added details about a second brother named Martin.
34
explaining retrograde amnesia
Explaining Retrograde Amnesia Compared to anterograde amnesia, retrograde amnesia has been less extensively studied, though recent years have seen more theoretical models, often tested with computer simulations. Three key models—by Alvarez and Squire (1994), McClelland et al. (1995), and Murre (1996)—differ in details but share a common assumption: the hippocampus and surrounding regions play a crucial role in memory consolidation. These models propose two types of consolidation: Hippocampal consolidation, a rapid process at the cellular level, involves the initial encoding of new information within the hippocampus. Systems consolidation, a slower, long-term process, gradually transfers information from the hippocampus to other brain regions for permanent storage. These processes are complementary; failure in hippocampal consolidation can interfere with subsequent systems consolidation. The models suggest that the hippocampus acts as an intermediary, storing novel information temporarily before transferring it to more durable cortical areas. Over time, these cortical links become more stable, making older memories more robust and in line with Ribot's law, which states that older memories are more durable. An alternative theory, the Multiple Trace Hypothesis (Nadel & Moscovitch, 1997, 1998), posits that the hippocampus is involved not just in encoding but also in retrieval. This model suggests that long-term consolidation creates multiple traces of memories within the hippocampus, leading to repeated representations of past experiences. However, it does not fully explain why some amnesic patients have strong autobiographical memory while others do not (Baddeley & Wilson, 1988). The question of which model best accounts for retrograde amnesia remains unresolved. Research into pure memory disorders and their brain connections has advanced our understanding of memory and brain function. However, in clinical settings, many patients present with complex symptoms, and the relationship between memory deficits and specific brain areas is often unclear. For patients, memory loss is often a debilitating issue, regardless of its origin, making it crucial to develop methods to support those struggling with memory problems in such conditions.
35
post-tramatic amnesia and consoliadtaion
Post-Traumatic Amnesia (PTA) and Consolidation After a traumatic brain injury (TBI), such as a severe fall, patients often enter a state of post-traumatic amnesia (PTA), characterized by disturbed attention and severe impairment in the ability to form new memories. Monitoring recovery through PTA is crucial, and various scales have been developed for this purpose (Levin & Hanten, 2002). A study by High, Levin, and Gary (1990) tracked 84 patients through PTA. Initially, patients regained personal knowledge (who they were), followed by orientation to their location, and finally, temporal orientation (the current date). The severity of retrograde amnesia typically shrank as recovery progressed, though in more severe cases, the displaced date could be off by several years. The duration of PTA can vary widely and provides a rough indicator of recovery potential (Levin, O'Donnell, & Grossman, 1979). Once PTA ends, retrograde amnesia persists but gradually improves over time. For example, a case of a 22-year-old green-keeper who suffered a motorcycle accident in 1933 illustrates this process. Initially, he had no recollection of the past five years, including time spent in Australia and the UK. Over a period of weeks, his memory improved, with full recollection returning within 10 weeks, shortly before the accident (Russell, 1959). The shrinkage of retrograde amnesia is typically less dramatic than in this example, but the dense memory loss immediately preceding the injury is characteristic. The question remains whether the issue is with memory registration or the consolidation of the memory trace. A study by Yarnell and Lynch (1970) of American football players with mild concussions supports the idea that the problem lies in the early consolidation of memory traces, as players could not recall details immediately after a collision but could remember them later. There is growing interest in the long-term effects of playing high-contact sports like American football, where repeated head injuries can lead to cognitive deficits. Geffen (1997) tested a football player with a head injury and found a delay in semantic processing speed in both the player and his teammates, suggesting subtle residual cognitive effects. While these effects tend to resolve within a few days in less severe cases, repeated injuries can cause lasting damage. Cognition typically recovers from mild TBI in 1-3 weeks, and from moderate to severe TBI in 1-3 months (Schretlen & Shapiro, 2003). However, repeated head injuries can have cumulative effects. Studies show that TBI in young adults is linked to a 63% increased risk of Alzheimer's disease (Fann et al., 2018). While the actual incidence remains low, research on retired NFL players suggests that 35% exhibit signs of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), which could progress to dementia (Randolph et al., 2013). This has led to growing concerns over sports-related head injuries, prompting rule changes in games like rugby to reduce head contact.
36
rehabilitation of patients with memory problems
Rehabilitation of Patients with Memory Problems Rehabilitation for patients with memory problems can vary greatly depending on the underlying cause and individual factors. In the case of dementia, for example, memory issues are progressive, and as the disease advances, it affects an increasing range of cognitive, social, and emotional functions. Consequently, efforts to restore memory function in dementia are often limited. However, there are cases where memory problems are not progressive, such as in traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke, encephalitis, or alcoholic Korsakoff syndrome, and here, psychologists can play a key role in helping patients make the most of their remaining cognitive abilities. Case Example: The Biker with TBI Consider the case of a biker who suffers from a traumatic brain injury (TBI). Although the likelihood of full recovery of episodic memory after severe TBI is low, it is possible to help the patient manage everyday challenges. Spontaneous recovery of cognitive function is common, but as research (Sunderland, Harris, & Baddeley, 1983) shows, there is little difference in memory performance between patients tested months or years after injury. This suggests that the improvement in memory after TBI is limited, and rehabilitation efforts should focus on compensatory strategies rather than attempting to restore lost memories. Key Rehabilitation Strategies Maximizing Remaining Memory Capacities: A psychologist can help individuals like the biker use remaining cognitive abilities to navigate daily life. This may involve focusing on preserved cognitive skills and developing ways to compensate for memory loss. Practical Interventions: Use of memory aids such as notebooks, electronic reminders, and calendars can assist with everyday memory challenges. Additionally, cognitive training techniques, such as memory exercises, may improve performance on certain tasks. Teaching Compensation Strategies: One key approach is teaching patients how to manage their memory difficulties effectively, using strategies that bypass the impaired memory functions. This might involve environmental modifications (e.g., creating routines, minimizing distractions) or learning mnemonic devices. Enhancing Attention and Concentration: Since memory problems often accompany difficulties in attention, improving concentration through exercises can help memory retention. This can involve mindfulness training or attention-enhancing tasks. Developing New Skills: Focusing on learning new skills that don’t rely on episodic memory—such as procedural memory (e.g., how to ride a bike or use a computer)—can provide patients with ways to gain independence despite memory issues. Evaluating Treatment Effectiveness Evaluating the success of any rehabilitation program is crucial to ensure the patient is benefiting from the treatment. This involves continuous monitoring and assessment to determine whether interventions are leading to real improvements or simply reflecting spontaneous recovery. Several methods to assess effectiveness include: Pre- and Post-Treatment Assessment: Conducting memory assessments before and after therapy can help determine whether there are tangible improvements in cognitive function. Daily Monitoring and Journaling: Keeping track of everyday memory challenges through journaling allows both the patient and psychologist to identify specific issues and successes. Patient Feedback: Regular discussions with patients about their experiences and the practical impact of the rehabilitation strategies can help guide future interventions. Tailored Approaches Based on the Patient’s Needs Rehabilitation strategies should be individualized. The treatment approach for each patient will vary depending on: Age: Older individuals might benefit from different methods than younger patients. Severity of Memory Deficits: Patients with mild memory issues may respond better to certain strategies than those with more severe deficits. Life Priorities: A psychologist needs to understand what aspects of the patient's life matter most to them (e.g., work, social relationships, or hobbies) to prioritize rehabilitation efforts. Conclusion While psychologists cannot restore lost memories, they can play a crucial role in helping individuals cope with memory deficits by teaching compensatory techniques, improving cognitive function in other areas, and providing tools to handle daily challenges. Continuous evaluation of these interventions ensures that rehabilitation remains effective and tailored to the patient’s needs.
37
external aids
External Aids for Memory Rehabilitation When dealing with memory impairments, external aids are crucial in helping patients manage their daily lives and compensate for memory deficits. These aids often focus on modifying the environment to make it easier for the patient to remember tasks, routines, and important information. Strategies for Severe Memory Deficits For patients with severe memory problems—such as those with Alzheimer's disease or other forms of dementia—external aids and changes to the environment are particularly useful. Some of the common strategies include: Labeling and Signposting: Items like cupboards, drawers, and doors may be clearly labeled to make it easier for patients to identify where things are stored. Signposts between rooms can help orient patients and guide them through their daily routines. Consistent Routines: Keeping objects in the same place and following a consistent routine for daily tasks can reduce confusion. For example, preparing meals in the same order every day or using a specific location for important items can provide structure and minimize forgetfulness. Learning and Support: Although learning these routines and strategies may take time, psychologists, occupational therapists, and caregivers can provide the necessary support. Patients often need reminders, guidance, and assistance as they adjust to these changes. While these strategies can be quite effective, they may not be sufficient for those with dense amnesia, such as those recovering from traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke, or encephalitis. Some patients may still struggle with independent living even when using external aids, though there are exceptions. Case Study: JC – A Success Story of Memory Rehabilitation One remarkable example is JC, a first-year law student who suffered a brain hemorrhage due to an epileptic seizure. After his injury, he developed severe amnesia but retained his intellectual capabilities. Through rehabilitation, JC learned to use various external aids to manage his memory deficits: Diary and Notebook: JC used a diary to track his day-to-day activities and a notebook to record important events. Subvocalization: To cope with memory lapses while working in his father's shop, he would verbally rehearse items or customer details in his head. Complex System: JC developed an elaborate system for organizing his life. This included: A weekly sheet with a daily agenda and detailed appointments. A Filofax with color-coded sheets for different activities and individuals. A Dictaphone to record events as they happened, which he would then transfer into his daily records. Despite the severity of his amnesia, JC was able to live independently, take a course in furniture renovation, and support himself. His story is an exceptional example of how external aids and a highly structured approach can enable patients to manage even severe memory impairments. Electronic Devices: Mobile Phones and NeuroPage In addition to more traditional external aids, electronic devices like mobile phones and pagers are increasingly being used to support memory in patients with neurological disorders. These devices can send reminders to help patients remember important tasks. One example is NeuroPage, a paging system developed by a neuropsychologist and an engineer. Wilson, Evans, Emslie, and Malinek (1997) evaluated NeuroPage with 15 patients who had memory or planning difficulties. The patients selected specific behaviors to remember (e.g., “Take your tablets” or “Prepare your packed lunch”), and their relatives monitored whether these tasks were achieved. NeuroPage is a simple paging device that could be programmed to buzz or ring at specific times, with a single button press to display a reminder message. The use of NeuroPage resulted in a significant increase in correct task completion—from 37% at baseline to over 85% during the treatment phase. The advantage of this system is that it can be used by a wide range of patients with various levels of cognitive impairment. However, mobile phones can also offer similar functionality today, though the simplicity of NeuroPage may make it more user-friendly for older patients. The Role of the Psychologist While technology can be a useful tool, the role of the psychologist remains crucial. The NeuroPage experience highlighted that the system's success depended on careful individualization: Determining what is important for the patient: The psychologist must help the patient and caregivers identify what tasks or behaviors are critical and ensure they are programmed into the device. Ensuring the patient uses the system: It’s not enough to just provide the tool. The psychologist must ensure the patient understands how to use it and consistently follows through with it. Moreover, like other forms of memory rehabilitation, new learning is necessary. This includes: Teaching the patient to use external aids effectively. Reinforcing the learning process through consistent practice and support. Adjusting interventions as needed based on the patient’s progress and feedback. Conclusion External aids, such as labeling systems, daily routines, and electronic devices like NeuroPage or mobile phones, can provide significant support for patients with memory problems. They allow patients to compensate for cognitive deficits and improve their quality of life. However, these aids should be combined with psychological support to ensure the patient understands and uses them effectively. The integration of technology with structured learning and ongoing support offers a promising approach to managing memory deficits, enabling patients to live more independently and regain a sense of control over their lives.
38
internal aids
Internal Aids for Memory Rehabilitation Internal aids refer to methods that help patients build new habits or learning strategies to enhance memory function. These methods focus on internal cognitive processes rather than external devices or environmental changes. However, the effectiveness of these methods varies depending on the severity of the patient's amnesia, and it is often challenging to introduce these techniques to patients with extensive memory impairments. Despite this, nearly all patients retain some level of episodic memory (even those with dense amnesia), which can be utilized for learning. The aim is to capitalize on any residual memory capacity while ensuring that progress is visible to the patient for motivation. Strategies and Techniques for Learning Focus on Specific Problems: Given that different patients have varying preserved capacities and priorities, memory rehabilitation often focuses on specific problems that are most relevant to the patient’s daily life. By targeting these problems, rehabilitation becomes more personalized and manageable. Single-Case Treatment Methods: Single-case methods, which were initially developed from Skinnerian learning principles, are widely used in memory rehabilitation. These methods often begin with establishing a baseline performance measure. For example, baseline performance can be tracked across multiple trials to see if progress occurs only after a specific treatment has been introduced. These methods are beneficial because they allow therapists to tailor interventions to the needs of each patient. Study Example: Wilson's Work (1987): A study by Wilson (1987) demonstrated the application of specific learning strategies for a patient, TB, who had Korsakoff syndrome. He was taught three different activities: Navigation: Initially, TB’s ability to navigate the rehabilitation center improved spontaneously and did not require further intervention. Reading and Remembering: Wilson used the PQRST method (Preview, Question, Read, State, Test) to help TB remember a news story. The PQRST method significantly improved TB's ability to retain information. Face-Name Learning: For this task, imagery was employed. For example, to remember the therapist's name "Stephanie," TB was encouraged to visualize her sitting on a step and clutching her knee. This strategy proved effective in helping TB learn names. Variability in Strategy Effectiveness Individual Differences: Not all strategies work for every patient. For instance, visual imagery can be a powerful technique for some patients but may be too demanding for others. Some patients, despite being capable of using imagery, may reject it due to personal preferences or beliefs (e.g., finding it "silly"). Single-Case Design: In certain studies, imagery-based strategies were applied to several patients, and improvements were evident only after the introduction of the strategy. This reinforces the idea that a specific intervention, such as imagery, can be causally linked to observed improvements. Retrieval Practice vs. Errorless Learning Retrieval Practice: In healthy individuals, retrieval practice (repeatedly trying to retrieve information from memory) can help improve learning. However, this approach is not recommended for amnesic patients because errors during retrieval can persist and disrupt learning, especially in patients with severe episodic memory impairments. Errorless Learning: Errorless learning is a technique that minimizes the likelihood of mistakes by providing the correct answer to the patient rather than allowing them to guess. This method has been successfully applied in amnesic patients, who are unable to effectively use errors to correct their memory due to the lack of episodic memory for earlier mistakes. The aim is to avoid errors altogether, which helps patients learn without reinforcing incorrect information. Terrace's Study (1963): Initially applied to pigeons, errorless learning was found to be beneficial for learning-disabled individuals (Sidman & Stoddard, 1967). Baddeley & Wilson (1994) Study: This study demonstrated that errorless learning significantly improved performance in amnesic patients compared to error-prone approaches. It showed that amnesic patients performed better in tasks like word completion when they were not encouraged to guess. Clinical Application of Errorless Learning Amnesic Patients: In subsequent studies (Wilson, Baddeley, Evans, & Shiel, 1994), errorless learning was applied to practical tasks, such as learning to use an electronic device or remembering staff names. Patients performed significantly better with errorless learning compared to standard error-prone methods. Broader Use: Over time, errorless learning has been used widely across various neurological conditions, including: Aphasia (language impairments) Schizophrenia (memory and learning difficulties) Amnesia (especially in the case of Korsakoff syndrome) It is now considered a patient-friendly approach that facilitates learning by reducing frustration and optimizing the use of implicit memory. The method is especially valuable because it minimizes error-based frustration, which can be a major obstacle for patients with memory impairments (Middleton & Schwartz, 2012). Conclusion Internal aids, like learning new strategies and habits, provide essential tools for patients with memory impairments to adapt to their condition. Techniques like PQRST (Preview, Question, Read, State, Test) and visual imagery can be effective, but errorless learning has proven particularly useful for amnesic patients. By minimizing errors and focusing on gradual learning, this approach helps patients achieve better results and reduces the frustration caused by repeated mistakes. Errorless learning has become a fundamental part of memory rehabilitation, not only for amnesic patients but also for individuals with other cognitive and language disorders, offering a more patient-friendly, successful approach to memory recovery.
39
conclusion
Our understanding of human memory has benefitted greatly from the study of patients with memory deficits, particularly in those cases where the deficit was limited to a specific memory system. This knowledge has Memory sk into the memory clinic, helping in the assessment, diagnosis, understanding, and in the treatment of the patient's memory problems. As such the cognitive study of memory provides one component of the array of clinical knowledge and skills available to the clinical neuropsychologist. Unfortunately, these will not "cure" the memory deficit, but they can maximize the capacity of patients to cope with their affliction.
40
summary
Many kinds of disruption of normal brain function result in problems of learning and memory. These can be very severe and tend not to be reversible. Memory problems are a principal feature of Alzheimer's disease. The disease is progressive with increasing disruption of other aspects of cognition. With an aging population, dementia is a growing problem. Alzheimer's disease is its most common form involving a memory deficit of increasing severity. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is nonprogressive and may occur at a young age and persist over a lifetime. Episodic memory is particularly vulnerable and disabling across a wide range of causes of memory disorders. It is found in its purest form in the amnesic syndrome. Its principal feature is anterograde amnesia, failure to lay down new episodic memories. Implicit learning and memory are typically preserved. Anterograde amnesia is thought to result from failure to associate experiences with their context or location in time and spacea. This in turn is commonly thought to result from impaired consolidation of the episodic memory trace. Retrograde amnesia involves failure to access earlier memories including those acquired before the onset of amnesia. There is typically a gradient with items acquired earlier in life being better preserved. Traumatic brain injury occurs when a blow or sudden deceleration cause damage to the white matter through sheering or twisting. In severe cases, a period of coma may be followed by post-traumatic amnesia during which attention and new learning is disturbed. Both retrograde and anterograde amnesia will typically follow but become less severe over time. While organic memory deficits cannot be reversed, patients can be helped to cope. External aids such as diaries, reminders, and pagers offer the most extensive help. Patients still need to be trained to use these and to acquire other information; methods of achieving this are discussed.