(M) Descriptive - Epidemiologic Approach Flashcards

1
Q

This is the way to know the determinants and factors

A

Epidemiologic Approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
  • Record of patients
  • What is happening in the community
A

Examine Existing Facts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The hypothesis will be obtained from?

A

Examined Facts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Probably a cause-and-effect relationship

A

Generated New Hypotheses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

To know if the factors have an association

A

Test Hypotheses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Relation of the outcome from your hypothesis.

A

Test Hypotheses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is the final process of test hypothesis

A

Conclude- Generate New Facts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Not yet a fact but a contention –an intelligent guess!

A

Hypothesis

Epidemiologic Hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

A testable statement of a putative relationship between exposure/s and outcome/s

A

Epidemiologic Hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

T or F

Epidemiolofic Hypotehsis is not the possible explanation about the determinants of health and disease

A

F - it is faggot

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Variable X

A
  • Independent Variable
  • Exposure Variable
  • Factor
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Determinants

A

Variable X

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Variable Y

A
  • Dependent Variable
  • Outcome Variable
  • Disease
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what are the branches of epidemiology

A

Descriptive and Analytic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Distribution of health-related states

A

Descriptive Epidemiology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

describes disease occurrence as to person, place, and time

A

Descriptive Epidemiology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Studies generate hypotheses

A

Descriptive Epidemiology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Determinants of health-related states

A

Analytic Epidemiology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Examines associations between variables

A

Analytic Epidemiology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Studies test hypotheses

A

Analytic Epidemiology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

T or F

Analytic→ Descriptive

A

wala na bobo ka kung mag T

F sagot

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

T or F

Diseases do not occur at random

A

True

Rationale behind descriptive epidemiology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Disease patterns can be?

A

Identified

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

T or F

Disease patterns may contribute to the predictability of the disease

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Disease patterns provide ----- as to the etiology of the disease
CLUE
26
What are the 3 variables of epidemiology
* Person * Time * Place
27
WHO is affected by the problem?
PERSON
28
WHEN is the problem occurring
TIME
29
WHERE is the problem occurring?
PLACE
30
# What professional Identification of factors that contribute to [or inhibit) diseasedevelopment
For Epidemiologist
31
# What professional Krowledge ot the burden of the disease ## Footnote ex. which population or subgroups are affected
For Public Health Administrators
32
# Epidemiologist or Public Health Administrators Generation of hypothesis to test
Epidemiologist
33
# Epidemiologist or Public Health Administrators Efficients and targeted program planning
Public Health Administrators
34
Some Sources of Data for Descriptive Studies | familiarize or ikaw na bahala
* Census data * Vital statistical records * Surveys on food consumption, medication use, etc. * Patient records from clinics or hospitals * Employment health examinations
35
what can be inferred from the sources of data for descriptive studies?
the sources are READILY AVAILABLE | less resource-intensive than analytic studies
36
Individual data | theres 3
* Case Report * Case Series * Prevalence Survey
37
Aggregate Data
* Ecologic Study
38
the data is given as a whole; data individually will not be identified
Aggregate Data
39
A detailed account of a patient’s experience and clinical manifestations that comprise a rather novel or atypical health or disease event.
Case Report
40
Among the most common types of studies published in medical journals
Case Report
41
# Criteria for Case Report - T or F A case which have been never before tescribed
F - DESCRIBED | HASFASHDFHASHF
42
# Criteria for Case Report - T or F Case of a very rare health or disease condition
T
43
# Criteria for Case Report - T or F A known disease with old clinical feature
F - should be new
44
# Criteria for Case Report - T or F A known disease showing a novel pattern
T | A disease can present differently
45
A study of several subjects manifesting similar signs and symptoms and linked by a common exposure/experience
Case Series
46
A collection of individual case reports, reported as one paper
Case Series
47
# T or F Case series are historically important in epidemiology
True na true | Often used as an early sign of an epidemic
48
# T or F Using a case series rather than a single case report can mean differentiating between formulating a useful hypothesis and merely documenting an interesting medical oddity
True
49
Medical oddity
1 patient
50
Useful hypothesis
from more than 1 patient
51
Cannot be used to test (hypothesis) for the presence of a valid statistical association
Limitations of Case Report and Case Series
52
# Which limitation Lack of an appropriate Comparison group
Case series
52
# Which limitation Based on the experience of one person
Case report
53
AKA. Cross Sectional Study
Prevalence Survey
54
A study that determines the proportion of individuals with disease (or other health events) in a defined population at a given time point
Prevalence Survey
55
Provides a "snapshot" Of the population's health experience at a specified time
Prevalence Survey
56
prevalence study is retrospective or at time point?
AT TIME POINT
57
# Applications of Prevalence Survey - T or F Can assess health status and health care needs of the sample population
F - general population
58
# Applications of Prevalence Survey - T or F Can provide information on prevalence of disease or other health outcomes in special groups (age, occupational, religious, etc.)
T
59
A study that compares the frequency of disease (and/or other health outcomes) among groups
Ecologic Study
60
Have been used extensively by **social scientists**
Ecologic Study
61
Easily and inexpensively conducted
Ecologic Study
62
Utilizes aggregate data (collective group)
Ecologic Study
63
Summanes (means or proportions) of observations
aggregate data
64
# Characteristics of data Used in Ecologic Studies - T or F Aggravate data
F - aggregate
65
# Characteristics of data Used in Ecologic Studies - T or F not always available
F | Often readily available
66
# Characteristics of data Used in Ecologic Studies - T or F Uses routinely collected demographic data, vital statistics, consumer information, etc.
T
67
# Characteristics of data Used in Ecologic Studies - T or F Data on disease and data on exposure need not come from the same source
T
68
types of ecological study
* Multiple-Group Comparison * Time-trend/ Time Series Design * Correlational Study
69
if u see this card
review the correlation analysis
70
Making a causal inference at the individual level from an aggregate-level analysis of data
Ecological Fallacy
71
Ecological Fallacy should not infer at individual level, why?
the data came from aggregate-level, so it should be in a POPULATION level
72
# ecological fallacy - T or F The conclusion about the individuals is drawn from the observation of the population to which the individuals belong
T
73
# Limitations of Using Ecologic Studies - T or F Correlational data represent average rather actual exposure levels
T
74
# Limitations of Using Ecologic Studies - T or F Any non-apparent association may be masking a more complicated relationship between exposure and disease
F - APPARENT
75
# Limitations of Using Ecologic Studies - T or F Temporal ambiguity
T
76
# Limitations of Using Ecologic Studies - T or F the sequence is not followed, studied exposure and outcome at the same time, it is wrong
Temporal ambiguity | same limitation with cross-sectional studies
77
# Limitations of Using Ecologic Studies - T or F easy to control the effects of potential confounders?
F | mahirap
78
Rationale for use of Ecologic Studies
* Low cost and convenience * Simplicity of analysis and presentation * Interest in ecologic effects * Limitations of individual-level studies
79
if u see this card
you're not toph