Social Impact Theory Flashcards

(24 cards)

1
Q

Social Impact Theory

A
  • not strictly an obedience theory
  • explanation of social influence
  • explains how the effects of others alters how we respond to a situation
  • how others impact upon our behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Sources

A
  • people who provide the influence
  • the ones making you follow orders
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Sources - example

A
  • authority
  • Experimenter (milgram)
  • Teachers
  • Doctors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Targets

A
  • those who are influenced
  • the ones following the orders
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

targets - examples

A
  • participants
  • students
  • nurses
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what impacts our chances of being influenced

A
  • importance
  • immediacy
  • number of sources of influence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Strength

A
  • how important the influencers are to you in terms of status
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Number of sources

A
  • we are more likely to be influenced by numerous sources
  • as number of people who agree increases
  • social impact increases
  • how many people there are in each group
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Immediacy

A
  • proximity at the time of influence attempt
  • closeness in time and space
  • psychological proximity
  • emotional closeness
  • were there buffers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Multiplication of impact

A
  • as a strength of the source increases so does immediacy and the number of people influenced
  • so social impact increases
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Division of impact

A
  • ability of a speaker to persuade the audience is divided upon the members of the audience
  • number of targets to be influenced affects the impact of the source
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Evidence = Milgram

A
  • 65% participants went up to 450 v
  • experimenter was deemed as high authority (yale)
  • in same room as participants
  • uniform = high authority
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Jackson

A
  • conducted an experiment in a zoo
  • asked visitors not to lean on the railing
  • manipulated strength
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how did Jackson manipulate strength

A
  • dressing actor as a zookeeper
  • or in T-shirt and shorts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Jackson - evidence

A
  • 58% participants obeyed source when dressed in uniform
  • 7% obeyed when the source was not in the same room
  • shows importance of uniform = alludes to high authority
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Applications = politicians

A
  • political leaders use strong, persuasive communication
  • try to talk to voters face to face
  • increases importance, strength, immediacy
  • increases chances of persuasion
17
Q

Applications = Workplace

A
  • deciding class size of students
  • psychosocial law = too many targets/ sources
  • effect begins to get lost
18
Q

Hoffling - against

A
  • doctor phoned 22 nurses to deliver an unknown drug overdose
  • 21/22 obeyed
  • if source is absent there should be a greater effect
  • how important is immediacy
19
Q

Kelman and Hamilton

A
  • agree with social situations on obedience
  • more legitimate the source = greater obedience
  • legitimacy of authority within the system
20
Q

legitimacy of authority within a system

A
  • power individuals have to give orders due to their position in the system
21
Q

power

A

ability to make someone do something

22
Q

Law of diminishing returns

A
  • incremental influence of each additional person decreases as the number of people increases
  • once a source group is bigger than 3 each added individual has a less influential effect
23
Q

reductionist

A
  • reduces human complexity ; thoughts / feelings / experiences to 3 numbers in order to predict the outcome
  • quantifying strength can be too subjective
  • SIT needs to gather qualitative data to understand how targets and sources perceive each other