theory of mind + intentionality Flashcards

(47 cards)

1
Q

what is theory of mind

A

capacity to understand others have own and sepaerate minds (beliefs, desires, knowledge etc)

‘socialfunction of intellect’; macchiavellian intelligence and deceptoiiin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

at what age in humans does TOM develop

A

3-5 years old

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what might be the coginitive origins of TOM?

A

cognitive capacity

building on from simple capacities

an emergent property of different emergent properies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

how is TOM measured

A

self recognition; mirror test Gallup

false belief test; puppet

gaze following

perspective taking

deception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

describe the mirror test

A

Gallup 1970; measures self awareness

mark ‘self’ with paint; see if abillity to recognize self in mirror if ‘wiped off’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

who passes the mirror test

A

all great apes

child 2+ years

elephants; debated (but possible depending on mirror size)

cleaner wrasse fish maybe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is related to TOM

A

tactical deception (woodruff and premark 1979)

macchiavellian intelligence Byrne Whiten 1988

Politics de waal

mind reading

intellect adn sociality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how might TOm might an emergent propertyu

A

Barrett et al 2003:

combination of

  1. causal reasoning
  2. analogal reasonign
  3. episodeic memory

which requires
1. control of behaviour

2, large brain capactiy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

describe the extended false belief test (undrstanding qualitive differences of others)

A

given to 3-7 year olds

‘false belief test’; where at age 3 children can understand that different minds of people

god is all knowing, dog less able

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

how can primate mental state attribution be measured?

A

anecdotes

contiditional discrimination testing

trapping

triangulation (heyes 1993)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is triangulation

A

whereby animals differenfeitae bewteen one mental state and another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

how is triangulation tested

A

on chimps: guessor vs knower roles

guesseor leaves room and knower manipulates food container

chimps to ‘point’ out food pag

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

chimps + TOM (tomasello and call 2008) experiments

A

chimps understand goals and intentions of others

experiments:

gaze following (chimps and infants)

gestural communication (position self to a gesture; awareness of body-language connection)

food competition (pick food competition that others dont see)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

chimps + TOM (tomasello and call 2008) experiments

A

chimps understand goals and intentions of others

experiments:

gaze following (chimps and infants)

gestural communication (position self to a gesture; awareness of body-language connection)

food competition (pick food competition that others dont see)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

behavioural abstraction hypothesis

A

constructing categories of behaviour and making predicitons

humans added extra abillity for intentionallity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

perspective taking

A

‘from who does ape beg?’; blindfolded individuals vs mouthfolded individual

abillity to understand body function and output

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

povinelli argues

A

chimps dont have TOM because in persective takign case they dont differentiate between bliindfoloded/nonblind folded

but tomasello: tjey dont get task! rahter gaze following

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

woodlice case study

A

shelltleworth 1994:

woodlice move to humid spots; is this because of a mind goal?

no (data); a form of emergent distribution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

rats: colwill and descorla 1985 study: what does it test?

A

INTENTION:
1. idea must be achieved via action (GOAL)
2. there must be motivation to do so

rats given response=based stimulus

  1. press bar for sugar
  2. pull chain for pellets

response for sugar stable but extinction occurs–> value for pellets decrease over time

19
Q

False Belief Test

A

Sally and Ann (Baron-Cohen et al 1985)

Sally—> clown

Ann—> Little girl

2 box task + a bear

asked ‘where does Sally hink the bear is?

children from 5 years + pass it

20
Q

how is the false belief task tested on chimps

A

call and tomasello 1999:

box, reward, communicator + hider + partiicpant

21
Q

do chimps pass the false belief task

A

at first glance (1999 call and tomasello); No.

second glance 2017 krupenlas: red dot analysis of ‘gaze’ shows chimps DO pass

22
Q

what are the cognitive explanations behidn gaze following

A

low level: response to movement

high level: understand others see something else

23
Q

social gaze following + experiment

A

Gossen et al 2008 long tailed macaques:

showed subjects look UP when demonstrators do; stronger when demonstrator has a social expression of fear/agggression

24
target of attention gaze following + experiment
povienlli/tomasso: all greap apes follow gaze of humans around barriers overduin vreis et al: LT macaques recognize hierarhcy of others and dominance; open mouth + dominants followed (DOMINATNS FOLLOWED MORE)
25
perspective taking + experiment
food competition in LT macaques: when monkeys know others can see food; gaze follow more 1. if one way barier; look at food 2. if two way barrier; dont look at food
26
what cognitive abillities do apes have
self recognition false belief gaze following peserspective taking deception
27
what cotnigive abillities do monkeys have
self recognition (diverse) false belief? gaze following yes perspective taking yes deception X
28
what are the types of deception
1. strategic (0 order) 2. tactical ( 1 order) 3. intentional (2 and 3 order)
29
strategic deception
adopt anatomy via evolution to others (coincidence, automatic, conditioning) i.e. physiology, like mimicry
30
tactical deception
acts from normal reperotire in atypitcal context; creation of false beliefs (to benefit of actor; unerstand what others cant see/know) beahvioural; goal to decieve intensified by operant conditioning and experience
31
goals of tactical deception
manipulate objects manipulate people (social tools) gain resources
32
types of tactical deception
visual concealment acoustic concealment attention inhibition distraction creating false images manipulate taget with social tools
33
exmaples visual concealment
sneaky matings; lt macaques safari in chimps
34
examples acoustic concealement
vwithold alarm calls/give false ones (i.e. geladas dont vocalize during EPP/ chimps icnrease audio to exaggerate aggression)
35
example attention inhibition
gorillas avoid looking at desired objects to prevent others from looign at it
36
manipulate target w social tools?
a 'fall guy' i.e. trump and obama
37
creating an image
injury; pretending in chmps
38
honest signalling
zavahi 1975 high costs of deception, response of hard to fake signals (handicaps like peacock tail) but deception can still occur at low level (behavioural)
39
deceptive signalling
transmission of misinformation of one animalt o the same/different species to propogte untrue beliefs - flexible use of multiple + novel signals and actions 1. deprive information 2, dishonest signals and coercion
40
interspecies"anti-predator deception PREY examples
mimicry---> hawk moth like an owl/mimic octopus like lionfish crypsis---> insects pretending to be leaves vai camoflauge distraction---> plover display
41
interspecies"anti-predator deception PREDATOR examples
mimicry: male jumping spiders mimic courtship signals of females of other sepcies imitation: male fireflies imiate femaleflaslights of prey on male of other species
42
interspecific (conspecific) deception examples
food competition---> TUFTED CAPUCHISN use antipredator calls to decieve dominatns for food ravens lead conspecifics away from food
43
non predator deception examples
cuckoldry: placing eggs into nest of another to rase them; the cuckoo cildrne taken on audio/visual markers of adopted nest parent-offspring communication; cuckoos vocalize extra for more food
44
what is intentional deception?
making a target believe something false (creating false beliefs) understanding others mental states
45
how do chimps use intentioanl deception
chimps decieve humans during reward task experiment by choosing food hidden from human view (hare et al 2006)
46
critique of anecdote studies on deception?
not systematic underrepresented coincicential might be social learning and not TD2 (so rather TD1)