theory of mind + intentionality Flashcards
(47 cards)
what is theory of mind
capacity to understand others have own and sepaerate minds (beliefs, desires, knowledge etc)
‘socialfunction of intellect’; macchiavellian intelligence and deceptoiiin
at what age in humans does TOM develop
3-5 years old
what might be the coginitive origins of TOM?
cognitive capacity
building on from simple capacities
an emergent property of different emergent properies
how is TOM measured
self recognition; mirror test Gallup
false belief test; puppet
gaze following
perspective taking
deception
describe the mirror test
Gallup 1970; measures self awareness
mark ‘self’ with paint; see if abillity to recognize self in mirror if ‘wiped off’
who passes the mirror test
all great apes
child 2+ years
elephants; debated (but possible depending on mirror size)
cleaner wrasse fish maybe
what is related to TOM
tactical deception (woodruff and premark 1979)
macchiavellian intelligence Byrne Whiten 1988
Politics de waal
mind reading
intellect adn sociality
how might TOm might an emergent propertyu
Barrett et al 2003:
combination of
- causal reasoning
- analogal reasonign
- episodeic memory
which requires
1. control of behaviour
2, large brain capactiy
describe the extended false belief test (undrstanding qualitive differences of others)
given to 3-7 year olds
‘false belief test’; where at age 3 children can understand that different minds of people
god is all knowing, dog less able
how can primate mental state attribution be measured?
anecdotes
contiditional discrimination testing
trapping
triangulation (heyes 1993)
what is triangulation
whereby animals differenfeitae bewteen one mental state and another
how is triangulation tested
on chimps: guessor vs knower roles
guesseor leaves room and knower manipulates food container
chimps to ‘point’ out food pag
chimps + TOM (tomasello and call 2008) experiments
chimps understand goals and intentions of others
experiments:
gaze following (chimps and infants)
gestural communication (position self to a gesture; awareness of body-language connection)
food competition (pick food competition that others dont see)
chimps + TOM (tomasello and call 2008) experiments
chimps understand goals and intentions of others
experiments:
gaze following (chimps and infants)
gestural communication (position self to a gesture; awareness of body-language connection)
food competition (pick food competition that others dont see)
behavioural abstraction hypothesis
constructing categories of behaviour and making predicitons
humans added extra abillity for intentionallity
perspective taking
‘from who does ape beg?’; blindfolded individuals vs mouthfolded individual
abillity to understand body function and output
povinelli argues
chimps dont have TOM because in persective takign case they dont differentiate between bliindfoloded/nonblind folded
but tomasello: tjey dont get task! rahter gaze following
woodlice case study
shelltleworth 1994:
woodlice move to humid spots; is this because of a mind goal?
no (data); a form of emergent distribution
rats: colwill and descorla 1985 study: what does it test?
INTENTION:
1. idea must be achieved via action (GOAL)
2. there must be motivation to do so
rats given response=based stimulus
- press bar for sugar
- pull chain for pellets
response for sugar stable but extinction occurs–> value for pellets decrease over time
False Belief Test
Sally and Ann (Baron-Cohen et al 1985)
Sally—> clown
Ann—> Little girl
2 box task + a bear
asked ‘where does Sally hink the bear is?
children from 5 years + pass it
how is the false belief task tested on chimps
call and tomasello 1999:
box, reward, communicator + hider + partiicpant
do chimps pass the false belief task
at first glance (1999 call and tomasello); No.
second glance 2017 krupenlas: red dot analysis of ‘gaze’ shows chimps DO pass
what are the cognitive explanations behidn gaze following
low level: response to movement
high level: understand others see something else
social gaze following + experiment
Gossen et al 2008 long tailed macaques:
showed subjects look UP when demonstrators do; stronger when demonstrator has a social expression of fear/agggression