Supreme Court Cases Flashcards

1
Q

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

A

—–The court established its role as the arbiter of the constitutionality of federal laws, the principle is known as judicial review

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Fletcher v. Peck (1810)

A

—–The decision stems from the Yazoo land cases, 1803, and upholds the sanctity of contracts. first time supreme court assumed right to declare a state law unconstitutional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

A

—–The Court ruled that states cannot tax the federal government, i.e. the Bank of the U.S.; the phrase “the power to tax is the power to destroy”; confirmed the constitutionality of the Bank of the U.S.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Dartmouth College v. Woodward (1819)

A

—–New Hampshire had attempted to take over Dartmouth College by revising its colonial charter. The Court ruled that the charter was protected under the contract clause of the U.S. Constitution; upholds the sanctity of contracts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)

A

—–Clarified the commerce clause and affirmed Congressional power over interstate commerce

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1832)

A

—–ruled an indian tribe was neither a foreign nation nor a state and therefore had no standing in federal courts. But indians still had unquestioned right to their land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Worchester v. Georgia (1832)

A

—–Established tribal autonomy within their boundaries, i.e. the tribes were “distinct political communities, having territorial boundaries within which their authority is exclusive” the laws of georgia can have no force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857)

A

—–Speaking for a widely divided court, Chief Justice Taney ruled that Dredd Scott was not a citizen and had no standing in court; Scott’s residence in a free state and territory had not made him free since he returned to Missouri; Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in a territory (based on the 5th Amendment right of a person to be secure from seizure of property), thus voiding the Missouri Compromise of 1820

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Ex parte Milligan (1866)

A

—–Ruled that a civilian cannot be tried in military courts while civil courts are available, 1866

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Munn v. Illinois (1877)

A

—–A United States Supreme Court case dealing with corporate rates and agriculture. allowed states to regulate certain businesses within their borders, including railroads

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Civil Rights Cases (1883)

A

—–Legalized segregation with regard to private property, 1883. Cases invalidated Civil Rights acts of 1875

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Wabash RR v Illinois (1886)

A

—–National power. Federalism. The Supreme Court forbade any state to set rates, even within its own borders, on railroad traffic entering from or bound for another state. This paved the way for the creation of the Interstate Commerce Commission in 1887.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

In Re Debs (1895)

A

—–denied a writ of habeas corpus to Eugene Debs, after he was cited for contempt for violating an injunction against the Pullman strike. Strike interfered with the federal responsibility to transport the mails and its authority over interstate commerce

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Plessy v. Ferguson 1896

A

—–Legalized segregation in publicly owned facilities on the basis of “separate but equal”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Cummins v. County Board of Education (1899)

A

deciding this case, the U.S. Supreme Court officially applied the “separate but equal doctrine” to public schools. As a result of this decision and Plessy v. Ferguson, segregation laws known as Jim Crow laws, piled up throughout the South.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Northern Securities Co. v. U.S. (1904)

A

Re-established the authority of the federal government to fight monopolies under the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, northern securities corporation by jp morgan

17
Q

Lochner v. New York (1905)

A

York State law fixing maximum working hours for bakers was declared unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court. The court held the law exceeded the police powers of the state and interfered with the individual’s right to freedom of contract under Amendment 14.

18
Q

Muller v. Oregon (1908)

A

—–Supreme court ruling that upheld a ten-hour work day law for women largely on the basis of sociological data regarding the effects of long hours on the health and morals of women.

19
Q

Schenck v. U.S. (1919)

A

—–Unanimously upheld the Espionage Act of 1917 which decalred that people who interfered with the war effort were subject to imprisonment; decalred that the 1rst Amendment right to freedom of speech was no absolute; free speech could be limited if its exercise presented a “clear and present danger”

20
Q

Adkins v. Children’s Hospital (1923

A

—–Declard unconstitutional a minimum wage law for women on the grounds that it denied women freedom of contract. reversed supreme courts ruling in muller v. oregon which had declared women to be deserving of special protection in the workplace. said women were now equal and didn’t need protection

21
Q

Schecter v. U.S. (1935)

A

—–Sometimes called “the sick chicken case.” or Schecter poultry case Unanimously declared the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) unconstitutional on three grounds : the act delegated legislative power to the executive, there was a lack of constitutional authority for such legislation; and it sought to regulate businesses that were wholly intrastate in character, 1936

22
Q

Korematsu v. U.S (1944)

A

—–The court upheld the constitutionality of detention camps for Japanese-Americans during World War II, 1941

23
Q

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas (1954)

A

—–Unanimous decision declaring “separate but equal” unconstitutional

24
Q

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)

A

—–Extends to the defendant the right of counsel (lawyer) in STATE AS WELL AS FEDERAL CRIMINAL TRIALS regardless of their ability to pay. major broadening of the us bill of rights

25
Q

Miranda v. Arizona (1966)

A

—–The court ruled that those subject to in-custody interrogation be advised of their constitutional right to an attorney and their right to remain silent, 1966

26
Q

Roe v. Wade (1973)

A

—–The court legalized abortion by ruling that state laws could not restrict it during the first three months of pregnancy. Based on the 4th Amendment rights of a person to be secure in their persons. 1973

27
Q

U.S. v. Richard Nixon (1974

A

court rejected Richard Nixon’s claim to an abolutely unqualified privilege against any judicial process

28
Q

Bakke v. University of California (1978)

A

—–In this 5-4 ruling the Supreme Court outlawed quotas
and ordered that Alan Bakke be admitted to medical school. But the court also upheld the principle of affirmative action, explaining that race or ethnicity could be counted as a plus in an applicant’s file as long as it did “not insulate the individual from comparison with other candidates.”

29
Q

Obergefell v. Hodges (2015)

A

Overturned the Defense of Marriage Act. Made gay marriages legal nationwide by claiming that states that refused to allow marriages were violating the 14th Amendment’s right to equal protection under the law.