chapter 8 Flashcards

(69 cards)

1
Q

An aggregate is

A

a gathering of people, but it

is not necessarily a group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

has special characteristics than
sets it apart from an aggregate
◦ Members interact
◦ Members influence each other

A

A true group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

An aggregate of two or more
individuals who interact with and influence
one another

A

Group:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

6 characteristics of a group

  • what is there between members
  • have reasons for?
  • what type of roles?
  • what types of ties?
  • do they depend on each other?
A
  • Interaction and mutual influence among
    members
    -Groups have reasons for existence
    -Group have norms
    -Formal or informal roles
    - Members have emotional ties to each other
    -Interdependence among members
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Instrumental group

A

Perform a specific task

Committees and juries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Affiliative group

A

Exist for a more general, social reasons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The strength of the

relationships that link members of a group

A

group cohesiveness:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Being around others regularly increases perception of

group membership

A

Physical closeness of members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Cohesiveness related to mutual liking among members

A

mutual attraction of members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

why do groups form?

A

because they satisfy needs that

cannot be satisfied individually

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

-Comparison of emotions, attitudes, behaviors, etc. with others
-Provides verification of our attitudes, beliefs and
behaviors
- Self-esteem preserved when we find out others fail at
a task

A

Social comparison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Part of identity derived from group

affiliation

A

◦ Self-concept:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The performance- enhancing effect of others on behavior for simple, well-learned behavior

A

Social facilitation:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The performance-detracting effect of an audience or coactors on complex, not-well-learned behavior

A

Social inhibition:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

the presence of others is a source of and increases? and this is the?

A

arousal

and arousal model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Presence of others will cause arousal only when they can reward or punish the performer

A

Evaluation apprehension:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

The presence of others is a source of distraction leading to
conflicts in attention between an audience
and a task

A

Distraction- conflict theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

The performance inhibiting
effect of working in a group that involves
relaxing individual effort based on the belief
that others will take up the slack

A

Social loafing:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Group members who do not do their share of the work in a group

A

Free riders:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

-More important task….

-Social compensation:

A
  • less social loafing
  • Working harder to make up for
    the weakness of others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q
  • (sucker effect)

- Larger group,

A

◦ More loafing if others are loafing

- more loafing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

A less competent group member increases performance when group performance depends on combined effort

A

Kohler effect:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Kohler motivation gain and why it occurs

A

◦ Less capable member works harder than expected
-because feedback about member performance
increases competition between members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

is related to higher levels of hostility directed at members of out-group

A

Strong in-group identification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
-A number of factors predict one group’s reaction to other competing groups in society -does not sat we will discriminate against other groups, but lays the groundwork for it to occur
Self-identity theory (SIT)
26
- An unattractive in-group member is perceived more negatively than an unattractive out-group member - similarly, attractive in-group member is rated more highly than attractive out-group member
Black-sheep effect
27
The widespread and universal behavior of excluding or ignoring other individuals or groups
Ostracism
28
- Physical ostracism
-includes solitary confinement, | exile, or the time-out room in grade school
29
- Behaviors perceived by the victim as intended to be deliberate and harmful
- Punitive ostracism:
30
Purpose of ostracism from the point of view | of the ostracizer
is controlling the behavior of | the victim
31
 Males respond to ostracism with  Females respond to ostracism is not only face to face interaction
- males=social loafing | - females=with greater effort
32
A phenomenon occurring in large-groups in which individual identity is lost within the anonymity of those groups, perhaps leading to a lowering of inhibitions against negative behaviors
Deindividuation:
33
- becomes impulsive, aroused, and wrapped up in the cues of the moment - increases with group size - is more likely to do what group is doing
deindividualized person
34
do better in group or individually
Groups outperform the average individual member -Groups recognize a correct solution more quickly ◦ Groups reject errors more quickly ◦ Groups have more efficient memory systems
35
A shared system for placing events into memory (encoding), storing memories, and retrieving information -ex. if someone in group is good at math, they are told to remember all math concepts
Transactive memory system:
36
Different pieces of information are stored by different group members, but all members have access to the information -ex. scientists each that specialize in bio/chem/phys/ whatever can all access info
Differentiated transactive memory system:
37
the same information is stored by each group member, with all group members having access to it - ex. biologists with the same speciality
Integrated transactive memory system:
38
 Group performs equally to what member? | 
second best member and group perform | equally
39
Groups use shared information, and avoid
unshared information
40
A leader who shares power with the other members of the group and includes them in the decision making more likely to make incorrect decision
Participative leader:
41
A leader who gives less value to participation, emphasizes the need for agreement, and tends to prefer his or her own solution - they are better at managing info
 Directive leader:
42
A leader who places emphasis on communicating group goals and expressing optimism about the group’s ability to reach those goals
Transformative leader:
43
A leader who rewards positive outcomes but also focus on mistakes made by group members
Transactional leader:
44
A group member’s feeling of obligation to obey the group’s leader
Legitimacy
45
who performs better- high competence or low competence groups? remember iqs matter
Groups with high-competence members outperform those with low competence members
46
- how do male groups work compared to female | - what types of juries take longer
Male groups do better when they have a specific task to work on  Female groups do better at communal activities involving friendship and social support -diverse juries take longer
47
The illusion that members of small groups think they are more effective than larger groups, which may not be the case
Illusion of efficacy:
48
- Task-based cohesiveness:
- Members mutual respect for each other’s abilities and skills
49
Cohesiveness can detract from productivity if?
it becomes more important than solving a | problem
50
A rule concerning the number of members of a group who must agree before a group can reach a decision
Decision rule:
51
The winning alternative must receive | more than half the votes
Majority rule:
52
-Intellective task:
-When one member solves problem the group uses it (truth wins)
53
 When a task involves a problem with no certain outcome, a decision rule with both majority and plurality rules works best
free
54
The tendency for individual, prediscussion opinion to become more extreme following group discussion
Group polarization
55
“A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group; when the members’ striving for unanimity overrides their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action”
Groupthink
56
the arousal model says what about simple/complex tasks?
we do worse on on difficult tasks that are unlearned or incompletely learned we have enhanced performance on well learned tasks
57
what are the three sources of arousal
arousal theory evaluation theory distraction-conflict theory
58
 Kohler motivation gain only occurs when?
group members know how each member is performing, and not when performance level is anonymous
59
- using the cold shoulder or the | silent treatment
- Social ostracism
60
Consensus, all members must agree
◦ Unanimity rule:
61
◦ Using ostracism preemptively when you think someone might feel negatively toward you
- Defensive ostracism:
62
Groups outperform individuals when? | 
on a difficult task
63
does a groups iq equal the sum of the members iq's?
No the groups IQ is higher
64
◦ Interpersonal cohesiveness:
-Members mutual liking
65
◦ Judgmental task:
-Majority rule
66
Group discussion allows us to compare our beliefs with those of others  Causes reassessment of individual belief and a shift to more extreme decision
Social comparison:
67
The decision-making group does not seek analysis and information from sources outside the group
Group insulation:
68
The leader presents his or her preferred solution to the problem before the group can evaluate all the evidence
◦ Promotional leadership:
69
◦ Group homogeneity:
Groups that are made up of people of similar background and opinions are prone to have similar views