Deviation From Ideal Mental Health AO3

Question 1

❌ Why is Jahoda’s definition of ideal mental health considered unrealistic?

Answer 1

Few people can consistently meet all of Jahoda’s criteria for ideal mental health, meaning most people could be labelled ‘abnormal’ at some point. This questions the definition’s validity, as it may pathologize normal human experience without clear guidance on how many criteria must be absent for someone to be considered ‘abnormal’.

Question 2

❌ How is the deviation from ideal mental health definition culturally biased?

Answer 2

Jahoda’s criteria are based on individualistic Western values. For example, self-actualisation is a concept that may seem self-indulgent in collectivist cultures like China, where community and interdependence are valued more. This cultural bias means the criteria cannot be universally applied.

Question 3

✅ What makes the deviation from ideal mental health definition favoured by therapists?

Answer 3

It emphasizes positive mental well-being rather than focusing on pathology. This allows therapy sessions to focus on personal growth, such as improving self-esteem, making it a practical and constructive tool for mental health interventions.

Question 4

✅ In what way is the deviation from ideal mental health definition holistic?

Answer 4

It considers an individual as a whole person, rather than focusing on a single aspect of behaviour. This is important because abnormality is a complex issue, and a holistic approach ensures that all aspects of a person’s well-being are considered.