Evidence Flashcards

(16 cards)

1
Q

Where the legal burden is on the prosecution

What is the standard of proof?

A

Beyond reasonable doubt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Where the legal burden is on the defense

What is the standard of proof?

A

The balance of probabilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the two offenses where corroboration evidence is required to support a conviction?

A

Perjury and treason

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is visual identification evidence?

A

An assertion by a person

Based on what they have seen

That a defendant was out or near place

Constituting, direct or circumstantial evidence of the commission of an offense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

There are a number of different types of visual identification evidence

What are they?

A

Recognition evidence
Where a witness, identifies someone as being near the scene of an offense through prior acquaintance with that person

Observation evidence
About the actions of a person and their participation in the offense

Resemblance evidence
Describes the physical characteristics of someone involved in an offense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a formal identification procedure?

A

Either a lineup or a photoboard

As soon as practical
Compared with no fewer than 7
Similar in appearance
No indication, whether or not the suspect is in the lineup
Sworn

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are some reasons for not following a formal ID?

A

Refusal of the suspect

Singular appearance

Substantial change in appearance

No officer could reasonably anticipate ID would be an issue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why is recognition evidence important?

A

Recognition of the suspect by the eyewitness may make a formal procedure unnecessary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Other than naming a defendant

What are the other two ways of witness can identify a defendant visually

A

Identification made shortly after the offence (eg a witness, pointing in offender route to Police arriving at the scene)

Chance meetings
We’re a witness identifies the offender after a chance meeting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the standard of proof for voice identification evidence?

A

The balance of probabilities

This is a strange one because voice evidence is less reliable, but has a lower standard of proof

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

If a statement is deemed unreliable by a judge

What happens to the admissibility of that statement?

A

It is deemed inadmissible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What contributing factors would be taken into account to deem a statement unreliable?

A

Mental or psychological condition of the deference attendant, when the statement was made

Disabilities intellectual, or otherwise of the defendant

The nature of the questions put to the defendant and the way that they were put

The nature of any threat promise me to the defendant by police

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

If a statement is deemed to be oppressive, what does oppression mean?

A

Violent in human or degrading conduct towards another person

Or threat thereof

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is improperly obtained evidence?

A

Evidence that has not been obtained properly by the way of an enactment

Such as warrantless search power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

A judge might not deem improperly obtained evidence and admissible.

What would they consider in making that decision?

This is called the BALANCING TEST

A

The importance of the right breached

The nature of the impropriety, whether it was deliberate or by mistake

Seriousness of the offense

Why the impropriety was done for example was the danger to Police or was the urgency around obtaining the evidence?

Were there any other investigative techniques not involving a breach of rights known to be available but not used