Explanations of Offending- Biological, Biopsychosocial (Forensic Psychology) Flashcards
(21 cards)
Atavistic form
Biological approach to offending that attributes criminal activity to earlier species inferior to non-criminals
They will inevitably not fit in with the rules of modern society
Lombroso’s characteristics of criminals
- narrow, sloping brow
- a strong, prominent jaw
- high cheekbones
- facial asymmetry
- dark skin
Lombroso’s research
Lombroso examined cranial and facial features of living and dead criminals:
• 383 dead and 3839 living criminals (skulls)
• concluded that 40% of all criminal acts should be accounted for by people with atavistic characteristics
Positive Evaluation of Lombroso
Father of modern criminology
Beggining of OP - criminals had set characteristics aiding the policing in narrowing down suspects
Negative Evaluation of Lombroso
Findings are correlational facial and cranial differences may be influenced by other factors such as poverty or poor diet. Criminality such as theft could be due to environmental factors
Lombroso did not compare his sample to a non-criminal control group. Goring did with 3000 criminals and a non-criminal group and found no evidence of atavistic form in criminal group
Biologically deterministic and scienfically racist
Genetic Explanation
A persons inherited DNA from their parents may predispose them to criminal behaviour
MAOA gene
Warrior gene breaks down dopamine, noradrenaline and serotonin
Low activity results in less MAOA to break down neurotransmitters
The more dopamine, noradrenaline and serotonin in the body increases agression
Brunner et al. 1993, large family in the Netherlands
- anti-social and criminal behaviour: rape, arson common in family
- lower IQ: family average IQ of 85
- causes a deficiency in MAOA- enzyme responsible for the metabolism of serotonin
Candidate gene: Tiihonen et al. 2014
- genetic analysis of 900 Finnish offenders
- individuals with abnormalities of MAOA genes were 13 times more likely to have a history of violent behaviour
—>consider cause and effect:
Diathesis Stress Model
-link between genetic predisposition and biological and psychological trigger
Neural Explanation
People with less developed PFC have less self control over levels of rage and aggression
Prefrontal Cortex
• individuals who experience antisocial personality disorder show reduced activity in the PFC, the part of the brain that regulates emotional behaviour
• Raine (2000) found an 11% reduction in the volume of grey matter in the PFC of people with APD compared to control groups
Raine
- 41 NGR (not guilty for reasons of insanity) and 41 controls
- significant reduction in the activity of the PFC compared to the control group
- later found an 11% reduction in the size of the PFC in people with ADP
Raine negative evaluations
Only show an association between the reduced activity in the PFC and criminal behaviour
Deterministic to say cause of criminal behaviour is due to uncontrallable biological factors - also at odd with the justice system
Socially sensitive to label people who haven’t even committed a crime
Evaluation against genetic and neural explanations
- criminality is complex and genetic and neural explanations are simplistic
- Katz et al. (2007) crime does run in families but so does emotional instability, social deprivation and poverty
- no study has found 100% concordance rate between MZ twins and often they have been low
Evaluation of biological determinism
- presents ethical problems for our legal system since it negates free will
- presents problems for society and implications for sentencing
-‘the Mobley defence’
The Criminal Personality
- Criminals will score highly in psychoticism - anti socials who are empathetic
- neurotic-extravert personality type
- more likely to commit crimes based on emotion and will seek dangerous activities
- neuroticism= good indicator of criminal behaviour in older people
- extraversion= younger people
The Criminal Personality = Extraversion + Neuroticism + Psychotism
Conditioning
We learn what is good and bad behaviour
We associate socially acceptable behaviours with rewards and criminal behaviour with punishments
Evidence for Eysenck’s theory of criminal personality
-Eysenck and Eysenck (1977)
* compared 2070 male prisoners scores on EPI with 2422 male controls
* they were sub-divided into age groups 16-69 years
* across all age groups prisoners recorded higher scores than controls for P, E and N
Evaluation of criminal personality: cultural bias
Bartol and Holanchock (1979)
* studied Hispanic and African-American prisoners in a high-security prison
* 6 groups - based on criminal history
* compared against a non-criminal control group
* all found to be less extravert than a non-criminal control group
Evaluation of criminal personality: biological biases
Biologically deterministic
Can lead to people blaming their biology for their behaviour