ICD diagnostic Flashcards
(9 cards)
ICD
build up in tension, relieved when person engages in certain behaviour
leads to euphoric rush of please, short lives
kleptomania, pyromania, gambling disorder
kleptomania
affects 0.6% of pop @ any age
more fem than male
don’t want/need the items they steal
bradford and balmaceda 1983 4% of shoplifters only kleptos
behaviour reinforced by the short term relief but usually long term depression anxiety bc shame and guilt
diagnosis = rule out other causes like hearing voices
pyromania
fascination with fire
don’t intent to cause damage
relief and pleasure
3-6% psychiatric inpatients thought to meet criteria (burton et al 2012)
age of onset young - teens
but severity increases over time
risk = boredom, stress, inadequacy, conflict
mood substance disorders common
90% of pyros feel guilty
> 30% suicidal
gambling disorder
4% lifetime prevalence in USA black and shaw 2019
build up of tension that starts w placing a bet
people who gamble show similar physical and behavioural signs and symptoms
^ griffiths 1993
found tolerance in gamvlers whose heart rates returned back to nnormal
so need gamble longer to feel same arousal when theyre regular gamblers
65% withdrawals like insomnia headaches upset stomach
diagnosis = impaired control over gambling
> where and when it happens
how often and how much is bet
persistance for 12 mnths b4 diagnosis
eliminate mania as a cause bc gambling seen in BPD
kleptomania symptom assessment scale (K-SAS)
11 item self report scale
over past week
0-4 score
max score 44
> 31 = severe
21 = moderate
most people 22-37
grant et al 2003; K-SAS can assess change in severity
K-SAS strength
accessibility and use in everyday life
ten mins to complete, dont need training to administer
covrs all aspects: thoughts, urges. behaviour, distress (hollander and berlin 2007)
no delays in treatment
K-SAS strength OBJECTIVE
qualitative data
interview=subjective
reduces bias > objective diagnosis more standardised
K-SAS weakness
social desirability bias
self report ques
might lie
people usually ashamed
under-report the extent
reduce VALIDITY
K-SAS idiographic vs nomothetic
nomothetic approach
large amounts of data collected over the years
can compare w normative data
but symptoms can be seen out of context, no bg to it
case studies use triangulation
idiographic methods also like interviews
> glover case study glover 1985
quantitative data alone may not be helpful