Social methodology Flashcards

(121 cards)

1
Q

Questionnaires

A
  • provide a tool for data collection
  • designed to gather a large amount of data
  • by accessing a large sample
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

how can questionnaires be administered

A
  • by post
  • face to face
  • online
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

which 2 types of information can questionnaires gather

A
  • quantitative
  • qualitative
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

quantitative data

A
  • numerical data
  • measurements of quantity or amount
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

how can quantitative data be objectively analysed

A
  • easy to analyse
  • percentages and other statistics can be calculated
  • data can be presented in graphs/tables so efficiently communicated with others
  • removes researcher bias
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

strengths of quantitative data

A
  • objectively analysed
  • reliability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

when does quantitative data have reliability

A
  • the way it is gathered is controlled sufficiently well for the test to be repeated to see if similar results are found
  • quantitative data often comes from close ended questions in questionnaires
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

weaknesses in quantitative data

A
  • lacks validity due to social desirability
  • answers given may show response bias
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

when will quantitative data lack validity due to social desirability

A
  • respondents may say what you think they should say
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

when in quantitative data may answers show response bias

A
  • if questions are listed so that responders are likely to be answering ‘no’ to a number of questions in a pattern they may continue to answer no out of habit
  • respondent may have a personality trait to agree or disagree all the time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

qualitative data

A
  • rich in detail or description
  • usually in textual or narrative form
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

strengths of qualitative data

A
  • provides detailed information
  • good validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

qualitative data - detailed information

A
  • allows for in depth analysis
  • adding a useful understanding
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

qualitative data - good validity

A
  • comes from open ended questions
  • respondents can say what they really think about an issue
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

weaknesses - qualitative data

A
  • may be subjective
  • it is difficult to gather
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

qualitative data - subjective

A
  • opinion based not factual
  • making it difficult to analyse and compare responses
  • answers may be difficult to caterogise and hard to summarise
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

qualitative data - difficult to gather

A
  • respondents may be reluctant to give an in depth response
  • data may take a long time to gather
  • respondents may miss out open ended questions
  • as it takes longer to write out answers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

open ended questions

A
  • allow respondents to answer however they want
  • generates qualitative data
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

strengths of open ended questions

A
  • gathers rich, detailed data
  • participants can interpret the questions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

open ended questions - gathering rich, detailed data

A
  • respondents are not forced into specific answers
  • they can say what they want
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

open ended questions - participants are able to interpret the questions

A
  • increases validity as they enable participants to talk about what they really think
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

disadvantages - close ended questions

A
  • analysis may involve elements of subjectivity
  • difficult to display results after analysis
  • participants may not complete the questions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

open ended questions - subjectivity

A
  • analysis may be difficult
  • answers will be detailed and different to each other
  • more prone to researcher bias
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

open ended questions - difficult to display results after analysis

A
  • answers are likely to be detailed and different to each other
  • no graphs/tables
  • averages cannot be calculated
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
open ended questions - participants may not complete the questions
- as responses take longer - it is more difficult to think of the answer than to tick a box
26
closed ended questions
- restrict respondents to a predetermined set of responses - generates quantitative data
27
strengths of closed ended questions
- participants give standardised answers - closed ended questions provide reliability
28
closed ended questions - participants give standardised answers
- numbers can be generated - analysis is straight-forward - as 1 set of responses can be compared fairly with another set
29
closed ended questions - reliable
- questions and answer options are the same for all respondents - question wording can be used to make the question clear - if the meaning is the same = more reliable
30
weaknesses of closed ended questions
- they force a response - range of choice answers reduce validity
31
closed ended questions - force a response
- respondents have to choose from a set of answers - may not agree with any of the choices
32
closed ended questions - range of choice answers reduce validity
- respondents may not be able to say what they want to say - answers may not be accurate - therefore invalid
33
types of closed ended questions
- fixed choice - likert scales - ranked scale
34
fixed choice questions
- closed ended questions which offer a fixed choice - such as yes/no - or a list of options
35
example of fixed choice questions
- Do you own a pet : yes / no - How old are you ? (please circle) 18-40 yrs, 41-60 yrs, 61+yrs - Circle 3 adjectives that best describe your personality agreeable, selfish, happy, lonely, sporty, gentle
36
Likert scale questions
- respondents select from a fixed set of choices to rate their opinion to a series of statements
37
examples of Likert scale questions
- I like meeting new people (please circle) - Strongly agree (5), Agree (4), Neutral (3), Disagree (2), Strongly disagree (1)
38
Ranked scale questions
- respondents rank their choices relative to other options
39
Example - ranked scale questions
- rank the following list of animals in order in which you fear them - with 1 being the most feared and 5 the least feared - horse, rat, spider, rabbit, dog - _ _ _ _ _
40
Strengths of questionnaires
- simple and clear - uses self report data - evidence = Cohrs et al - Pilot surveys - Same questions asked to all participants - Valid - Reliable
41
Questionnaires - uses self report data
- direct - not likely to be affected by subjectivity of a researcher - participants are often subjective in a good way - keeping responses valid as data is about themselves
42
Questionnaires - Cohrs et al
- tested whether peer report or self report data differs - self report data found that peers rate similar to self rated - high reliability
43
Questionnaires - pilot surveys
- allows researchers to check questions for clarity - ensuring required information is gathered - feedback can be obtained - allows changes to be made
44
Questionnaires - same questions are asked of all participants
- set procedure - little variation - answers shouldn't be affected by anything other than the opinion of the respondent
45
Questionnaires - High validity
- they can be carried out by post - removing researcher bias - more valid as responses are real and not affected by someone else
46
Questionnaires - reliable
- they can be repeated accurately - they use set procedures - replicable
47
Questionnaires - weaknesses
- uses self report data - people may be in different moods - ethics - lacks validity - lacks reliability
48
Questionnaires - self report data
- people can be biased when reporting their own feelings, views, attitudes, behaviours - due to social desirability - people may answer how they think they should answer
49
Questionnaires - people may be in different moods
- have different ideas about their behaviours one day compared with another - data could be valid on the day asked - but may not be for everyday situations
50
Questionnaires - ethics
- ensure questions asked aren't distressing for participants to answer
51
Questionnaires - lacking validity
- Lying may occur due to demand characteristics - questions which give forced choice answers may hint at the aim of the questionnaire - so respondents may give answers they think researchers may want - lacking validity - open ended questions are often restricted in length - reducing validity - they usually have fixed questions so respondents can't expand on answers - less valid
52
Questionnaires - lacking reliability
- the way questionnaires may be administered may vary - less reliable
53
interviews
- involve a researcher asking questions in order to gather details from a respondent based of the aim of the study
54
how are interviews carried out
- face to face - over the phone - online
55
what is the best way to carry out an interview
- face to face
56
why are interviews best held face to face
- interviewers have the opportunity to expand or clarify questions
57
when is an interview chosen over a questionnaire
- if some questions need to be explored in more depth - when the respondent may need reassurance - when access is difficult
58
access
- refers to reaching the participants - physically reaching them and finding them in the first place
59
when is access difficult
- when data needs to be gathered from a child - data needs to be gathered from someone with mental health backgrounds
60
types of interviews
- structured - unstructured - semi- structured
61
structured interviews
- include pre-set questions in a specific order - follows a set format - there may be instructions on where/how to expand on answers (strongly planned)
62
give an example of a structured interviews
- asking people questions on peoples obedience levels
63
give an example on when structured interviews may take place
- over the phone - face to face
64
Unstructured interviews
- usually gather qualitative data - as it starts with a loose aim - no pre-set questions - explore the responses given - not in a set format which allows the interviewer to explore the area with further quesions
65
Semi - structured interviews
- has set questions - some of which can be explored further by the interview
66
what data does semi-structured interviews produce
- quantitative - qualitative
67
strengths of semi - structured interviews
- quantitative and qualitative data can offer insight - data can be compared between respondents - replicable - has set questions and the positives of an unstructured interview - allowing respondent to lead = valid data
68
what kind of data do interviewers gather
- mainly qualitative - usually used when in depth and detailed data is needed - some quantitative
69
in interviews, how is qualitative data usually presented
- in the form of a story / attitudes
70
in interviews, how is quantitative data usually presented
- age - length of time in a job
71
the less structured the interview, the more likely which type of data
qualitative
72
why are interviews useful in exploratory research
- it is in an area that is not well researched - depth and detail is usually needed - there may be an aim but not hypothesis - aim is likely to be broad as it's exploring an area rather than a specific hypothesis
73
what happens during an interview
- notes can be taken - interview may be recorded - once completed, notes must be transcribed - so all data is available for analysis
74
why must participants be involved in each stage of the interview
- they must see schedule before the interview so they know what to expect throughout - they must agree to the chosen format for recording the interview - they must see the full transcript of the interview once complete so they can agree what was said
75
how can researchers remain objective in an interview
- producing a complete transcription of the interview = ensures they can't select what should be included - ensuring interviewee sees results and agrees that they are accurately recorded - having another researcher analyse the results
76
strengths of interviews
- Interviewer can explain questions and explore issues by asking further questions - they are most ideal when a researcher needs to be able to investigate further/explain issues to a participant - obtain in-depth and detailed data which are valid - valid = case studies
77
Interviews - obtaining in depth and detailed data
- valid - interviewees talk in their own words - and aren't restricted
78
Interviews - valid (case studies)
- data is real life and true = valid - an interview is important for a case study
79
interviews - weaknesses
- interviewer influence - status of interviewer - analysing data - difficult to maintain objectivity
80
interviews - interviewer influence
- when asking questions, interviewers may find it difficult not to influence answers - they may find a way to ask a question with a certain emphasis
81
interviews - status of influencer
- how the interviewer looks /acts mat also affects responses - e.g interviewees may give different responses to male and female interviewers
82
interviews - interpreting responses
- the researcher may find it hard not to interpret the responses when analysing the data and forming themes
83
Interviews - maintaining objectivity
- may be difficult - subjectivity may also be an issue - hard to analyse interviews - generating themes involves selection and the appropriate grouping of data - this choice may be subjective
84
reliability - questionnaires
- standardised - same set of question is administered to all participants - reducing variability in how they are asked - responses are easier to compare
85
reliability - interviews
- lower - unstructured/semi structured can vary greatly depending on interviewers approach - can cause inconsistency in results
86
validity - questionnaires
- usually have fixed questions - so respondents cannot expand on their answers - so responses may not be valid - open ended questions are often restricted in length - so qualitative data can be limited = less validity
87
validity - interviews
- offer a greater flexibility and depth - interviewees speak in more detail - interviews obtain more in depth data - interviewees talk in their own words and aren't restricted - data is real life, true and valid
88
subjectivity - questionnaires
- open ended questions allow for subjectivity - close ended questions provide less detail/depth due to standardised procedure - responses could be limited = less subjectivity
89
subjectivity - interviews
- unstructured = allow flexibility in how questions are answered - involve direct interaction between researcher and participant = deeper more detailed responses - more subjective= gives more room for participants to elaborate on thoughts and feelings
90
3 measures of central tendency
- mean - mode - median
91
mean
- average score - found by adding up the scores - and dividing by numbers / scores / participants
92
issues with using a mean
- an outlying score can skew the data so the average isn't useful - not suitable if scores are reasonably spread - sometimes doesn't make sense/unhelpful
93
mode
- the most usual in the set of scores - the score that appears most often
94
how do we calculate the mode
- put scores in order - to see which scores are repeated and how many times
95
issues with the mode
- it may not represent the data very well - as mode could be the lowest score
96
median
- the middle score
97
how do we calculate the median
- if there is an odd number of total scores - identify the middle score - if there is an even number of total scores - we can add up the 2 scores that are around the middle score and divide them by 2
98
issues with the median
- if there is no middle score - it isn't useful in that it does not show and outlying score - it just shows the middle set of scores
99
frequency tables
- displays the number of times in which each piece of data occurs - summarise data by offering groups of scores in order to produce a condensed version of the data set
100
graph
- visually displays data - making it easier to compare data sets - trends and differences can be easily identified and understood
101
rules for bar charts
- 2 axes (vertical - y, horizontal - x) - both axes must be fully labelled - columns showing different variables are not joined
102
measures of dispersion
- range - standard deviation
103
range
- shows the spread of scores in a data set
104
how do we calculate the range
- subtract largest score from the smallest score
105
standard deviation
- shows how far the scores in a set of data vary from the mean
106
high standard deviation
- the spread of scores from the mean is wide
107
low standard deviation
- the spread of scores from the mean is fairly close
108
analysing qualitative data - measure
thematic analysis
109
steps in thematic analysis
- read and re-read data - generate your initial codes - searching for themes - reviewing themes = reviewing at the level of coded data + reviewing at the level of the themes - defining and naming themes
110
generate initial codes
- code for as many potential codes as possible - data that is identified by the same code should then be collated together
111
code
- an idea that captures something important about the data in relation to your research question - represents a pattern in the responses
112
searching for themes
- we should have a long list of different codes - focus on a broader level of themes - sort codes into potential themes - themes are made up of a subset of codes - codes are kept to form main themes or sub - themes - some codes are discarded - we should now have a collection of themes and sub-themes
113
reviewing themes
- refining themes - stage has 2 levels - reviewing at the level of the coded data - reviewing at the level of the themes
114
Reviewing themes: stage 1 - reviewing at the level of coded data
- re-read all data extracts that fit into each theme - ensures all data forms a coherent pattern - if data does not fit into theme check if theme is problematic / whether data needs rearranging - once data fits each theme coherently move onto level 2
115
Reviewing themes: stage 2 - reviewing at the level of the themes
- consider each theme in relation to your data corpus - use a thematic map to help you visualise the relationship between themes - check relationships between themes reflect the meaning of your data as a whole - if not return to step 3 - at the end of this stage you should have a satisfactory thematic map of data
116
defining and naming themes
- researcher conducts and writes a detailed analysis of each theme - now create an overall narrative with all of your data - after revision of themes in relation to data a final thematic map is produced - we should be able to describe a theme in a couple of sentences
117
Strengths - thematic analysis
- reducing data into a manageable summary and conclusion without losing validity of data - valid
118
how is thematic analysis valid
- encourages researcher to derive themes from the data - rather than impose pre selected themes
119
Thematic analysis weaknesses
- researchers often don't fully explain how they arrived at the themes and so a study isn't easily judged for its validity - takes time and skill - not always valid
120
Thematic analysis - takes skill and time
- identifying themes at the start may be easy - but identifying a limited number of themes that represent data fully - is much more difficult and takes time
121
Thematic analysis - not always valid
- researcher may have themes in mind when doing initial coding - less valid as themes may come from researcher rather than data and is the intention - thematic analysis may be driven by theory and intention - = less valid