W2: Knowledge Clips Flashcards
(41 cards)
Trait theories
1930s-1940s. Focused on identifying innate qualities or traits that distinguished leaders from non-leaders. Originates from the notion that leaders are born and people with certain inborn traits are the ones who will naturally emerge as leaders. Identified several key qualities, e.g. charisma, intelligence, dominance, self-confidence, or extroversion. While traits can to a certain extent predict leadership, they are better at predicting leader emergence rather than effectiveness
Behavioural theories
1940s-1950s. Characterised by the question, What do leaders do? Shifted the focus from inert traits to observable behaviors. Being able to distinguish between effective and ineffective leader behaviors can help to design leadership talent management system. Key theories are Ohio State studies and University of Michigan studies
Ohio State Studies
Focus on identifying the dimensions of leadership behaviour. Wanted to understand the different ways in which leaders behaved and how these behaviours affected group dynamics and performance. Two primary dimensions of leadership behaviour were initiating structure and consideration
University of Michigan Studies
Focus on identifying different leadership styles and their impact on organizational effectiveness and employee satisfaction. Proposes two leadership styles; employee-centred leadership and job-centred leadership
Employee-centred leadership
People-oriented leadership, building strong interpersonal relationships, fostering collaboration, and attending to social emotional needs of the employees
Job-centred leadership
Task-oriented leadership, which emphasises efficiency goal attainment and task accomplishment. Leaders following this style tend to focus more on the technical aspects of the job and less on the interpersonal relationships
Contingency theory
1960s-1970s. Considers various situational factors. Based on Fiedler’s contingency model. Very unfavourable and very unfavourable situations require task oriented leaderships, while in moderate situations people oriented leadership is required
Fiedler’s contingency model
Proposed that effectiveness of a leader depends on the match between the leadership style and the situational context. Believed that leaders cannot change their leadership style based on the situation but they should rather look for situations which match their leadership style. Two primary leadership styles; task-oriented and relationship-oriented
Situational favourableness
Determined by three factors; quality of leader-member relations, task structure, and position power
Quality of leader-member relations
Refers to the quality of relationship between the leader and the follower including trust communication and cooperation. A good relationship leads to strong mutual trust, respect, and positive interactions
Task structure
Describes the clarity and predictability of tasks or objectives ranging from highly structured to unstructured. In low structures, there is ambiguity, lack of clear objectives, and uncertainty in tasks. In high structures, tasks have clear goals, roles, and procedures
Position power
Indicates the degree of authority and control the leader has over their followers including formal power and influence within the organisation. Limited authority and control; challenges the decision making. High authority and influence; respect for leaders, decisions, and directions
Transactional and transformational leadership
1980s-1990s. Proposed the multifactor leadership questionnaire, which measures the extent to which leaders exhibit transactional and transformational leadership behaviour. Bass suggested that effective leadership often displays a combination of both. He conceptualised leadership as a continuum ranging from laissez faire leadership with low engagement to transactional leadership with moderate engagement to transformational leadership with high engagement
Transactional leadership
Involves exchange based relationship between the leader and the follower. Based on two main factors; contingent rewards and management by exception
Transformational leadership
Focuses on inspiring and motivating followers to achieve common goals
Multifactor leadership questionnaire
Implies that every leader displays a frequency of both the transactional and transformational factors. Leaders who satisfy their followers more and who are more effective are more transformational and less transactional
Contingent rewards
Transactional leaders use rewards and punishments to motivate followers to achieve specific goals. They establish clear expectations and provide incentives for meeting performance standards
Management by exception
Transactional leaders monitor performance and intervene only when deviations from standards
Active management by exception
Actively correct problems
Passive management by exception
Only passively intervene when really necessary
Idealised influence
Transformational leaders serve as role models for their followers earning admiration respect and trust
Inspirational motivation
Transformational leaders communicate at the compelling vision of the future, inspiring and motivating followers to commit to the shared goals, fostering optimism, and showing the purpose of the actions
Intellectual stimulation
Transformational leaders challenge the status quo and encourage creativity, innovation, and critical thinking among their followers
Individualised consideration
Transformational leaders show concern and empathy for the needs, aspirations, and development of each follower