W6: Hartner-Tiefenthaler et al. (2023) Flashcards
(11 cards)
Paper’s purpose
Investigates the nuanced impacts of employees’ online access to work tools (OAWT) outside traditional work hours, exploring its dual role in enhancing flexibility while potentially compromising work-life balance and employee well-being. It delineates how OAWT correlates with both positive aspects of flexibility, like available temporal and spatial flexibility, and negative outcomes, such as required temporal flexibility leading to work intruding on nonwork behaviours. Findings indicate that OAWT may buffer against the adverse effects of required flexibility on job satisfaction by offering employees discretionary control over their work
Online access to work tools (OAWT)
Phenomenon caused by the proliferation of digital technologies, which has revolutionised traditional notions of workplace boundaries. It presents a double-edged sword for organisations and employees. On the one hand, it offers unparalleled flexibility, enabling individuals to manage their tasks and responsibilities remotely, enhancing productivity and work-life balance. However, this constant connectivity also blurs the lines between professional and personal life, potentially encroaching on leisure time and exacerbating feelings of burnout and stress
Available flexibility
Portrayed as a beneficial aspect of OAWT, where employees are empowered to tailor their work schedules around personal commitments, thus potentially improving work-life balance and enhancing overall job satisfaction. It consists of temporal and spatial flexibility. It is positively related to job satisfaction
Required flexibility
Characterised by the expectation or obligation for employees to remain accessible and responsive to work-related demands outside standard working hours. This form of flexibility is associated with negative outcomes, including increased stress, diminished job satisfaction, and a greater likelihood of work tasks interrupting nonwork time
Work interrupting nonwork behaviours
The permeation of work-related tasks into personal time, facilitated by OAWT, disrupts individuals’ ability to detach from work. This intrusion is closely linked to required flexibility, underscoring the challenges faced by employees in establishing clear boundaries between their professional and personal lives. The study suggests that they contribute to a cycle of stress and emotional exhaustion that can undermine job satisfaction and well-being
Job satisfaction
Serves as the ultimate metric for assessing the impact of OAWT and flexible working arrangements. The study explores how it influenced by the interplay between available and required flexibility, mediated by the presence of OAWT. While available flexibility increases job satisfaction, required flexibility, especially when it leads to work encroaching on personal time, pose significant challenges to maintaining high levels of job satisfaction
Temporal flexibility
E.g. choosing when to work
Spatial flexibility
E.g. working from home
Autonomy paradox
Feeling obliged to be available, reducing actual autonomy
Required temporal flexibility
Negatively related to job satisfaction and positively to work interruptions
Jobs-Demands-Resources model
Autonomy boosts satisfaction, demands reduce it