ch. 12 social psychology Flashcards

(48 cards)

1
Q

attitude

A

a belief or opinion about anything

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

AB attitude

A

attitude is linked to ur behavior; we infer attitude by observing behavior (the AB link)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

the AB problem

A

social desirability motivation -> people often say one thing but do another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

the ABC model

A

a valid attitude has to have 3 components
A: affective component (strong/weak positive/negative emotion)
B: behavioral component
C: cognitive component (your thinking)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is persuasion

A

attitude change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

target audience

A
  • gender
  • knowledge (the less u know ab smth, the more easily persuaded)
  • forewarning
  • inoculation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

which types of communication are more persuasive?

A
  • video messages are more persuasive than written
  • emotional story more persuasive than statistics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

one-sided vs two-sided argument

A
  • one-sided works best when target is initially in favor of the message
  • two-sided works best when target is initially opposed to the message
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

source/speaker should have:

A
  • credibility (believability)
  • attractiveness
  • similarity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

forewarning

A

to alert an audience that someone is trying to persuade them)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

inoculation

A

immunization; weakened form of an argument. important ideas are overlooked by deflecting from it. find ur weaknesses + inoculate target audience against it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Festinger’s $1, $20 study

A

“Forced-compliance paradigm” subjects performed a series of repetitive and boring tasks and were then asked to lie to the “next subject” and say that the tasks were interesting and enjoyable. Some subjects were paid $1 for lying, while others were paid $20. The subjects who were paid $1 for lying later evaluated the tasks as more enjoyable than those who were paid $20. The subjects who were paid $20 should not have experienced dissonance, because they were well rewarded and had apple justification for lying, whereas those paid $1 had little justification for lying and should have experienced cognitive dissonance. To reduce the dissonance, they reevaluated the boring task as interesting and enjoyable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

3 ways we can reduce cognitive dissonance

A

Change existing beliefs
Adding new beliefs
Reducing the importance of the beliefs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

attributional theory

A

Theory that we attempt to make sense out of other people’s behavior by attributing it to either dispositional (internal causes or external (situational causes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

fundamental attribution bias

A

Tendency to overestimate dispositional (internal) causes and to underestimate situational (external) causes of behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

judgement ab the cause of someone’s behavior

A

Internal vs external + Stable vs. Unstable
Internal + Stable: “She’s smart”
Internal + Unstable: “She worked extra hard”
External + Stable: ​​”The test must have been easy”
External + Unstable: “She got lucky”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

actor-observer effect

A

a bias one exhibits when forming attributions about the behavior of others or themselves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

fundamental attributional error

A

we over-estimate the internal attributes for other’s problem behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

self-serving bias

A

we over-use external attributes for our own behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

conformity

A

going along w/ social norms; Tendency to change or modify behaviors so that they are consistent with those of other people

21
Q

compliance

A

Form of social influence in which people alter their behavior in response to direct requests from others, which usually involve a degree of coercion

22
Q

obedience

A

Social influence in which we alter our behavior in response to commands or orders from people perceived as having power or authority

23
Q

Ash Line Comparison study (conformity)

A
  • 76% conformed w/ obviously wrong answer at least once
  • informational conformity: assuming the group knows better
  • normative conformity: wanting to just fit in w/ the group
  • all we need is 1 person to break the unanimity of the group for u to speak your mind -> the power of an ally
24
Q

foot-in-the-door technique (compliance)

A

a person is first asked to agree to a relatively minor request that serves as s setup for a more major request

25
door-in-the-face technique (compliance)
a large request followed by a small request (you feel bad after rejecting first request so you comply with second)
26
Milgram's obedience study
* shock study * only one real participant, two actors Subject (teacher), learner (actor), experimenter (actor) * 65% of subjects went all the way to the end and delivered the highest shock * Learner got progressively worse, heart condition, banging on door to be let out all while the experimenter told the teacher to keep going no matter what * takeaway: people will obey legitimate authority even to the point of harm
27
Groupthink
* Janis, 1967 * a group makes a horrible decision (they wouldn't individually make)
28
antecedent conditions for Groupthink
1. high-group cohesiveness 2. isolation from outside information 3. directive leadership (leader starts off saying what they think, everyone just goes along) 4. high stress from imagined external threat 5. lack of methodical search + appraisal
29
diffusion of responsibility
Tendency for an individual to feel a diminished sense of responsibility to assist in an emergency when other bystanders are present (an explanation for the bystander effect)
30
the bystander effect
The more who are present in a situation where help is needed, the less likely it is that someone will help. two possible explanations: Fear of social blunder + Diffusion of responsibility
31
fear of social blunder
afraid to embarass yourself; social comparison (look at everyone else first, if they're doing nothing you do nothing). an explanation for the bystander effect
32
instinct (Freud's Thanatos + Eros)
aggression comes from death instinct. this gave way to drive theories.
33
drive (frustration-aggression hypothesis) (1939)
a popular but outdated theory that said we resort to aggression to reduce frustration. all aggression stems from frustration of some desire.
34
social learning
the current theory of aggression. aggressive behavior is learned classically, operantly, or operationally. more optimistic bc it doesn't have to be learned; a nonviolent world is possible.
35
prejudice
a feeling, usually negative, about a person based solely on their membership to a group
36
discrimination
a behavior based on prejudice
37
stereotypes
cognitions (thoughts) that members of a group are all alike in some way
38
racism
the belief that observable differences (personality traits) b/w races are due to genetics (there's more variation w/in a race than there are b/w the races -> race is not a valid construct)
39
sexism
the belief that observable differences b/w genders are due to genetics
40
social categorization
the overwhelmingly strong tendency among people to divide the world into groups that we treat very differently
41
us vs them (in-group vs out-group)
double standard: treating THEM diff than how you treat the ingroup US
42
illusory correlations
a pattern in the data that doesn't really exist. reaffirming belief, ignoring when it doesn't, look for patterns
43
the ultimate attribution error
the actor-observer effect applied to groups * when a member of an out-group does smth bad, we blame the whole group as bad. when a member of our group does smth bad, we blame the one person. * out-group homogeneity
44
self-serving bias
-> it's self-serving to let yourself off the hook
45
four relevant factors for interpersonal attraction (love and friendship)
Similarity Proximity Reciprocity Physical Attractiveness
46
the two types of romantic love
passionate and companionate
47
passionate love
goes from high to low (like fluid intelligence)
48
companionate love
goes from low to high (like crystallized intelligence)