chapter 8 and 11 test Flashcards

(49 cards)

1
Q

the procedure of punishment

A

decrease the probability of similar responses under similar circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the difference between punishment and punisher

A

punishment is the process

punisher is the actual consequence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Catania’s three criteria of punishment are different from positive reinforcement

A

behavior must have a consequence

behavior must decrease in strength

the decrease in strenght must be the result of the consequence.

(oppositive) to the three criterias of reinforcement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

negative punishment

A

the consequence is subtracted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

positive punishment

A

the consequence is added

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why are punishment and negative reinforcement confusing

A

reinforcer and punisher consequences are either added or removed. neither is an indicator for good or bad

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

two problems with (physical) punishment are that the recipient may try to run away called____________, or fight back, called______________

A

avoidance/escpae

aggression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

a third problem with (physical) punishment when aggression or escape are not possible, its a general (3 words) ______________

A

sepression of behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

the simplest alternative to punishment is to try to prevent the behavior from occurring by altering the environment in some, called (2 words) _________, or one may try to withhold all reinforcement from the undesired behavior, called________

A

response prevention

extinction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

list the different variables that affect punishment

A

contingency

temporal contiguity

punisher intensity/magnitude

punisher probability

introductory level of punishment

reinforcement of the punisher

alternative resources of reinforcement for the punished behavior

motivating operations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

describe the role of contigency in punishment

A

all things equal the greater the contingency between behavior and punisher, the quicker and faster the behavior decrease, or the greater the suppression of behavior.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

uncondtioned punishers

A

pain

intense noise

intense light

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

conditioned punishers

A

saying no

look of disapproval

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

automatic punishers of punishment

A

events that naturally follow a response

are usualy not mediated by other individuals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

punishment like reinforcement is an equal opportunity consequence

A

works to (strengthen) good or bad behaviors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

temporal contiguity in punishment

A

all things equal, the greater the temporal contiguity between behavior and the punisher, the more effective the punishment, or the quicker and stronger the decrease in the probability in responding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Earling Boe and Russel Church [1967] experiment:

A

In an experiment in which a group of rats received a shock for lever pressing, the higher contingency to shock lower the reduction of lever pressing during extinction, oppose to the rats with a lower contingency to shock per level pressing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

the longer delay between a behavior and punisher the (4 words)__________________, and the experiment that illustrates the point?

A

less effective the punishment

experiment by David Camp and colleagues (1976).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Within a lab setting Camp & colleage experiment was important for?

A

rats decrease of level pressing behavior was greater for immediate shock vs a delay of 2 seconds and 30 seconds.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Ann Abramowitz,and Susan O’Leary (1990) outside the lab study…

A

immediate reprimands were effective in suppressing off-tasking behaviors, but delayed reprimands were useless.

21
Q

punisher magnitude

A

all things equal the higher the intensity of the punisher the more effective decreasing the probability of behavior.

22
Q

electric shock and punisher magnitude importance

A

the degree of control to deliver precise electric shock. (magnitude of the shock)

23
Q

all things equal, the greater the probability of punishment, the quicker and stronger the decrease in the probability of responding

A

punisher probablity

24
Q

all things equal, the lower the introductory level of punishment, the less effective the punishment

A

introductory level of punishment

25
what should the introductory level of punishment, for parents who punish their children's behavior, and why?
high magnitude punishment weak magnitude to gradual inceasre in intensity leads to habituation.
26
the less reinforcement a behavior has the quicker the effects of punishment, or the more reinforcement of a behavior has the slower the effects of punishment
reinforcement of the punished behavior
27
motivating operations
the greater the MO/(EO) the less the effect of punishment on behavior
28
alternative sources of reinforcement
When punishing an unwanted behavior provide an alternative means of obtaining the reinforcers that maintain that behavior.
29
response dimension that can be punished
response rate response magnitude response duration response topography
30
lower-prabability behaviors will punish high-probability behaviors
premacks principle of punishment
31
problems with physical positive punishment
escape aggression apathy abuse imitation
32
Any operant training procedure in which certain kinds of behavior are systematically reinforced and others are not.
Differential reinforcement
33
Differential reinforcement of alternative behavior
a behavior that is different from an undesired behavior is systematically reinforced. The procedure provides an alternative way of obtaining reinforcement
34
Differential reinforcement of incompatible behavior
a behavior that is incompatible with an unwanted behavior is systematically reinforced.
35
Differential reinforcement of low rate
a behavior is reinforced only if it occurs no more than a specified number of times in a given period.
36
the 1st must know test phrase
The organism is always right
37
there is no such things as mistakes or errors....
there are always causes for behavior (determinsm)
38
Guttman and Kalish (1956)
Non-differential training S+----R----S(R+) generalization testing
39
There are 3 kinds of ways to do discrimination
non-differential training differential training - presence-absence differential training - intradimensional
40
Jenkin and Harrison (1960)
Experimenters conducted A: Non-differential training S+(D)-------R-----------S(R+) 1000hz. key Peck. food and got a flat generalization gradient then did: differential training: presence-absence S+(D)--------R----------S(R+) 1000hz. key peck. food. S-(delta)-------R-------S(ext) no tone. key peck. no food and got a more peaked discrimination gradient
41
a stimulus that evokes a type of behavior because that behavior has been reinforced in the presence but not the absence of the stimulus
discriminative stimulus (Sd/S+)
42
stimulus that abates a type of behavior because that behavior has not been reinforced (extingguished or punished) in the presence of that stimulus
stimulus delta (S-)
43
explain the finger pulls the trigger of a gun, the trigger also pulls the finger
the sight of the gun is an S(d) to pick up the gun, the feel of the gun is an S(d) for pulling the trigger with high MO (anger).
44
selecting from 2+ alternative comparison stimuli the stimulus that is the same as the same
(MTS) matching to sample
45
errorless discrimination
present the S(d) then immediately present the S(-) early, weakly and briefly, and gradually increase the strength of the S(-)
46
important phrase related to determinism
There are no such things as mistakes or errors because all behavior has causes.
47
Hanson (1958)
intradimensional- S+(d)--------------R----------S(+) 550nm. key peck. food. s-(delta)--------R-----------S(ext.) 555nm 560nm 570nm 580nm -Peak Shift away from the (S-)
48
two seperate responses are trained but each yields a different reinfrocer
(DOE) differential outcomes effect
49