Modalities Ch. 3 Flashcards

1
Q

difference between EBM and EBP

A

EBP applies EBM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

overarching goal of EBP

A

use best evidence possible to improve patient care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Evidence-Based vs. Patient-Centered Medicine

A

Powerful, different, somewhat contradictory philosophies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

EBM

A

approaches patient care from a biomedical perspective
based solely on scientific facts
is a doctor-oriented, disease-centered model
aims to improve quality by standardizing medical, through clinical guidelines of best practice
patients treated as a group
_____

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

best practices

A

philosophy of action
specific techniques, methods, activities, or processes
good guidelines apply to only 80% of patients
a given best practice only applies to a specific condition or circumstance
-may be modified or adapted for similar circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

protocols

A

a plan or set of specific steps to be followed
a strict process for monitoring and caring for specific conditions
often provides a practical, step-by-step framework for implementing guidelines

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

patient-centered medicine

A

a humanistic, biophychosocial approach
focus on patient participation in clinical decision making, using in-depth patient communication to understand patients’ complaints, unique needs, and who they are
moves care from clinician control to_______
patients are experts in the experience of their symptoms
patients differ, even with same S/S

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

benefits of EBP and PCM

A
EBP
-increased quality of care
-proven to work
PCM
-patient-specific (not cookie cuter)
-empowers the patient
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

detriments of EBP and PCM

A

EBP
-less personal
-might not work for everybody
-doesn’t account for patient differences
PCM
-giving patients too much control/power without knowledge
-can negate the expertise of the clinician

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

who one is best?

A

not either-or, but both
both are needed and must be integrated
-external clinical evidence can inform, but can never replace, individual clinical expertise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

components of EBP

A
defining a clinically relevant question
searching for the best evidence
appraising the quality of the evidence
applying the evidence to clinical practice
evaluating the process
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

clinically relevant questions

A

what’s the best course of action?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

components of clinical questions

A

patient population
intervention/treatment
outcome of interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

searching for the best evidence

A

technology is a blessing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is evidence

A

anything used to establish a fact, or give a reason to believe something
seek “facts”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

sources of medical evidence

A

tradition
experience
research
theory

17
Q

types of research

A

laboratory
observational
clinical trials

18
Q

laboratory

A

controlled
looks at
-physiological processes
-tissue response to intervention

19
Q

laboratory pros and cons

A

pros
-easy to control
cons
-limited by tissue type (healthy, animals)

20
Q

observational

A

observations in a natural environment

prospective or retrospective (before/after data collection)

21
Q

observation pros and cons

A

pros
-natural
cons
-uncontrolled

22
Q

clinical trials

A

observation + lab

23
Q

clinical trials pros and cons

A

pros

  • well controlled
  • natural setting
24
Q

narrowing the focus of your search

A

patient group
intervention
outcome
use studies within last 5-10 years

25
quality of evidence
there is a direct correlation between the quality of evidence and the quality of healthcare
26
levels of evidence
1. systematic reviews or meta-analyses or randomized controlled trials and high-quality, single, randomized controlled trials 2. well-designed cohort studies (observation) 3. case-control studies - comparison of two patients 4. case series and poor-quality cohort and case-control studies 5. expert opinion, based not on critical appraisal, but on reasoning from physiology, bench research, or underlying principles
27
quality of evidence
relates to the credibility, clinical significance, and applicability of evidence - how confident are you that it represents the "truth" - can you trust the results?
28
things to consider when applying the intervention
what are the goals? evidence patient preference
29
clinical outcomes
end results of specific health care practices and interventions
30
examples of clinical outcome measures
``` objective measurements (ROM, strength) patient-based assessments (questionnaires, pain scales) ```
31
how to integrate EBP and PCM
``` adjust evidence-based intervention based on the patient -determined by --patient progress --outcome measures communication -what? -why? ```