Romanian Orphan Studies Institutionalism

Question 1

Why has research for maternal deprivation turned to Orphan Studies

Answer 1

study effects of deprivation

on emotional and intellectual development

Question 2

Opportunity to look at effects of insitutional care and consequent institutional care arose in

Answer 2

romania in 1990s

Question 3

the former romanian president required romanian women to have how many kids

Answer 3

5

Question 4

romanian parents couldnt afford to

Answer 4

keep their children

Question 5

as romanian parents couldn’t afford to keep their children where did they end up

Answer 5

huge orphanages in very poor conditions

Question 6

after the 1989 Romanian Revolution many children were

Answer 6

adopted, some by british parents

Question 7

michael rutter and colleagues (2011_ studied a group of

Answer 7

165 romanian orphans

Question 8

what did rutter and colleagues study a group of 165 romanina orphans as part of

Answer 8

english and romanian adoptee study

ERA

Question 9

the orphans in the ERA study had been adopted by

Answer 9

UK families

Question 10

aim of the ERA study is to

Answer 10

investigate extent to which good care could make up for poor early experiences in institutions

Question 11

ERA Physical , Cognitive and Emotional development were assessed at ages

Answer 11

4 
6
11
15
22-25 years

Question 12

ERA Who served as the control group for rutters study

Answer 12

a gorup of 52 kids from UK , adopted around the same time

Question 13

ERA when children first arrived in the UK half showed signs of …

Answer 13

delayed intellectual development

Question 14

ERA when children forst arrived in teh UK half showed signs of delayed intellectual development and the majority were

Answer 14

severley undernourished

Question 15

ERA - at age 11 WHAT DID KIDS SHOW

Answer 15

kids showed differential rates of recovery related to their age of adoption

Question 16

ERA what was mean IQ of kids adopted at 6 months

Answer 16

102

Question 17

ERA what was mean IQ of kids adopted between 6 months and 2 years

Answer 17

86

Question 18

ERA what was mean IQ for kids adopted after 2 years

Answer 18

77

Question 19

ERA the differences remained at

Answer 19

age 16 beckett et al 2010

Question 20

ERA ADHD was more common in

Answer 20

15 and 22-25 year old samples (kennedy 2016)

Question 21

ERA in terms of attachment there was a difference in outcome related to whther adoption took place ….

Answer 21

before or after 6 months

Question 22

ERA chldren adopted after 6 months showed signs of

Answer 22

dishinbited attachment

Question 23

ERA Symptoms of disinhibited attachment

Answer 23

attention seeking
clinginess
social behaviour directed indiscriminatley towards all adults

Question 24

ERA in contrast children adopted before age of 6 months rarely displayed

Answer 24

disinhibited attachment

Question 25

Zeanah et al conducted the

Answer 25

bucharest early interventionn

Question 26

Bucharest early intervention assessed ATTAHCMENT IN

Answer 26

95 romanina kids

Question 27

BEI 95 romainia kids were assessed for their attchamrnt what ages were they

Answer 27

12-31 months

Question 28

BEI the 95 Romanian kids spent most of their lives in

Answer 28

institutional care 90% on avg

Question 29

BEI 95 romanina kids compared to control group of

Answer 29

50 children who had never lived in an institution

Question 30

BEI Bucharest earky interbention sample attachment type measured using

Answer 30

the strange situation

Question 31

BEI in addition to attahcment style being measured what were parents asked about

Answer 31

unusual social behaviours + symptoms of disinhibited attachment

Question 32

BEI what percentage of the control group were classed as securelt attached

Answer 32

74 %

Question 33

BEI what eprecentage of romanian orphans were classed as securely attached

Answer 33

19%

Question 34

BEI the description of disinhibited attachment applied to how many institutionalisation compared to control group

Answer 34

44% of institutional children | less than 20% of contrl group

Question 35

what are the 2 effects of institutionalisatoin

Answer 35

disinhibited attachment | Intellectual Disability

Question 36

children who spent eartly lvies in isntitutuionalisation ofeten showed disinhibited attchemnt .... how did they act towards familiar people and strangers

Answer 36

equally affectionate towards familair people and strangers

Question 37

why was being equally affectionate to familiar and stranegrs highlyt unsuual

Answer 37

children around age of 2 ofte showed stranger anxiety

Question 38

rutter explained disinhibited attachment as

Answer 38

adaptation to living with multiple caregivers in sensitive period of attachment formation

Question 39

in poor quality institutions like romania a child had 50 careghivers but

Answer 39

doesnt spedn enough time with any of them to be able to form a secure attachment

Question 40

in rutters study most chidlren showed signs of what when they arived in britian

Answer 40

intellectuak disability

Question 41

upin arriving in britian mostg kids showed signs of intellectual disability however if adopted before age of 6 months

Answer 41

they caught up witht the control group by 4

Question 42

as orpahns arrived wigh intellectual disabilty but caught up with control grouo by age 4 if they got adopted for 6 months] therefore like emotional developent , damage to intellectual development can be revoered if

Answer 42

adoption takes place before 6 months

Question 43

6 monbths is the age ..

Answer 43

attachments form