Chapter 34 Review Flashcards

1
Q

An argument in which the conclusion is certainly true if the premises are.

A

deductive argument

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

An argument that is valid and also has true premises; always has a tru conclusion

A

sound

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

To copy or imitate; to match the characteristics of another.

A

emulate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

An informal argument is cogent if the conclusion is likely to be true.

A

cogent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

universal, invariant, abstract rules of correct reasoning

A

laws of logic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

An argument that has some degree of unavoidable circularity due to the essential nature of the claim, and yet is self-consistent and non-arbitrary.

A

virtuous circle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Independent of arbitrary standards; being without exception or qualification

A

absolute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

A positive mental attitude toward a proposition; something a person accepts as true

A

belief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The opposite proposition is formed by adding “it is not the case that” to the original proposition. It always has the opposite truth value of a given proposition.

A

negation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

A stipulative or lexical definition that is associated with a particular scientific theory.

A

theoretical definition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The use of “all” that means “each and every one” taken separately - in contrast to collective

A

distributive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Opinions formed from evidence; what people reason to be true or likely true from evidence or reason.

A

inferences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The error (arbitrarily) using a double standard, especially when the arguer exempts himself from a standard he applies to others.

A

special pleading

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Able to exist or exert power at all locations in space at the same time.

A

omni-present

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

To project or expand beyond known data or experiences based on patterns exhibited in known data or experiences; to infer unknown values or properties based on known values or properties.

A

extrapolate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The disclosure of information from God to man contained in the Bible.

A

special revelation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

A series of propositions where the truth of one is said to follow from the others

A

argument

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

A logical ___ is a common error in reasoning.

A

fallacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Inclined or prejudiced to a particular position

A

biased

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

“With this, therefore because of this.” The (false cause) fallacy of assuming that event A caused event B solely on the bases that the two events occur together.

A

Cum Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

To provide reasons for proposition.

A

justify

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Shifting from one meaning of a word to another within an argument

A

equivocation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Fallacy of attempting to persuade people by stirring powerful emotions rather than making a logical case.

A

appeal to emotion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

The compound proposition “A and not-A” is always false. Or, “You cannot have A and not-A at the same time and in the same sense.”

A

Law of Non-contradiction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
The tendency to induce belief or behavior in a person. An argument is one in which most people will accept the conclusion as true
persuasive
26
The definition of a word that is consistent with its lexical definition, but which adds further restrictions for the purpose of clarification or scientific precision.
precising definition
27
Something that is based on speculation or conjecture for the sake of discussion or argument.
hypothetical
28
not changing over time
invariant
29
At variance or not compatible; two things that do not go well together
inconsistent
30
Disobedience to God
sin
31
The object or idea to which a word points or symbolizes.
referent
32
The Bible reveals that human beings are made in God's image, and therefore reflect some of His attributes, including the ability to \_\_\_.
reason
33
“A thing is itself” or “if A then A.”
Law of Identity
34
Abstract; existing within the mind such as a thought or idea
conceptual
35
Dependent on the thoughts or feelings of the individual.
subjective
36
Misrepresenting an opponent's position and proceeding to refute the misrepresentation rather than what the opponent actually claims.
the strawman fallacy
37
The proposition in an argument that the person is attempting to prove
conclusion
38
Applying a generalization to an exception.
sweeping generalization
39
\_\_\_ is the study of the principles of correct reasoning. It is the way God thinks
Logic
40
Contrary to the mind of God
false
41
A common error in reasoning.
fallacy
42
Pertaining to the belief that there are multiple gods.
polytheistic
43
A good argument has true \_\_\_, and the conclusion follows from them.
premises
44
to not have a specific reason for a belief or action; not having a reason
arbitrary
45
The study of the principles of correct reasoning which does not focus on the structure of an argument.
informal logic
46
Claiming that a proposition or an argument must be correct because a fallible person believes it. Often the appeal is to an expert but outside of his area of expertise, or to an expert who disagrees with other experts in the same field.
faulty to appeal to authority
47
Applicable everywhere.
universal
48
A proposition in an argument that is taken as an accepted fact.
premise
49
independent of the person; something that is the same for all people
objective
50
Arguing that a person's argument is wrong by attacking the character of the person.
abusive ad hominem
51
Conjecture, guess, or hypothesis, without sufficient supporting evidence.
speculation
52
the definition of a word found in a dictionary
lexical definition
53
Something that appears clear to the eye or mind, though it may not be.
apparant
54
Drawing a generalization from too few specific examples.
hasty generalization
55
A declaration of the meaning of a word or phrase that does not already have an established one.
stipulative definition
56
The negation of a proposition, or the combination of the proposition and its negation. “A and not-A” is a contradiction.
contradiction
57
That which is suggested by evidence or reasoning. That which follows logically from something else
implications
58
Attempting to persuade by asking a loaded question.
complex question
59
The error of defining a term in a biased way that would not be found in a dictionary in order to protect a claim from evidence to the contrary.
the no true scotsman fallacy
60
The error of drawing erroneous inferences from an analogy that is not similar in relevant ways to the topic under discussion.
false analogy
61
A categorical argument containing two premises and one conclusion that uses words like “all, some, no, not.”
syllogism
62
A way of reasoning that arbitrarily assumes what the person is attempting to prove. They commit the fallacy of begging the question.
vicious circle
63
Comforming to the mind of God
true
64
The error of attributing a cause-and-effect relationship between two events that do not actually have such a relationship
false cause fallacy
65
Changing the meaning of proposition by placing undue emphasis on a word or phrase
fallacy of accent
66
A philosophy advocating the repression of emotion and indifference to pleasure or pain.
stoicism
67
A written or spoken symbol that represents something else.
linguistic token
68
God always thinks correctly, and the Bible commands us to think like Him (Isaiah 55:7-8) and emulate His \_\_\_. (Ephesians 5:1)
character
69
A logical ___ is a common error in reasoning.
fallacy
70
true, justified belief
knowledge
71
An argument in which the conclusion follows logically from the premises, regardless of whether the premises are true.
valid
72
In accordance with our feelings or expectations
intuitive
73
To be ___ is to reason incorrectly. But god, by His nature always reasons correctly.
illogical
74
A category of logical fallacy in which the argument has used words or phrases in a way that is confusing or vague.
fallacy of ambiguity
75
To go beyond
transcend
76
Existing in thought as an idea but having no physical or material existence.
abstract
77
A guess; an inference formed without proof or with insufficient evidence.
conjecture
78
Persuading people to accept a position by generating sympathy for those who hold the position.
appeal to pity
79
In accordance with the laws of Logic: logical
rational
80
The quality of being unclear in meaning; the capacity to be understood in two or more ways
ambiguilty
81
A category of logical fallacy in which the argument has assumed something that is unproved or doubtful.
fallacy of presumption
82
arguing that a given action will set off a chain reaction leading to a particular result, when in reality other factors are likely to prevent that result.
slippery slope fallacy
83
The compound proposition “A or not-A” is always true. Or, “Either A is true or not-A is true.” A proposition always has the opposite truth value of its negation.
Law of the Excluded Middle
84
An informal argument is weak if the conclusion is not likely to be true.
weak
85
That which shows itself to be wrong. A self-refuting argument is one in which the conclusion is inconsistent with one or more of the premises.
self-refuting
86
Arbitrarily assuming what one is attempting to prove as part of the proof.
Begging the question
87
Pertaining to the amount, degree, or number of something.
quantitatively
88
Directing an argument against the person making the claim rather than the claim itself.
ad hominem
89
A category of logical fallacy in which the conclusion of argument is not strongly relevant to the premises.
fallacy of relevance
90
A fallacious definition, not found in any dictionary, that is intended to persuade someone.
persuasive definition
91
Falsely assuming that what is true of the parts/individuals must also be true of the whole/group
fallacy of composition
92
A truth claim, may be true or false
proposition
93
The disclosure of information from God to man
revelation (divine)
94
Using biased (often emotional) language to persuade people rather than using logic.
question - begging epithet
95
Fallacy of appealing to the unknown; specifically when a person argues that a claim is probably true simply because it has never been proven false.
appeal to ignorance
96
Pertaining to the belief or conviction that there is one and only one God.
monotheistic
97
Pertaining to the quality, kind, or nature of a thing, regardless of the amount or degree.
qualitatively
98
An argument in which the conclusion is likely to be true if the premises are.
inductive argument
99
Practical; based on what works regardless of theoretical considerations, principles, moral implications, or truth.
pragmatic
100
The use of “all” that means “all together” or taken as a whole - in contrast to distributive
collective
101
Falsely assuming that what is true of the whole/group must also be true of the parts/individuals
fallacy of division
102
having supreme power or authority and not required to answer to any higher authority
sovereign
103
\_\_\_ is having confidence (or proof, or good reasons) for what you have not experienced with your senses. It is a confident expectation in that which is unseen (Hebrews 11:1).
Faith
104
Having confidence in something not perceived with the senses.
faith
105
Arguing that something must be true because a majority believes it. This is a specific type of the faulty appeal to authority.
appeal to the majority
106
Attributing a concrete characteristic to something abstract.
reification
107
“After this, therefore because of this.” The (false cause) fallacy of assuming that event. A caused event B solely on the basis that B came after A.
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Fallacy
108
The study of the principles of correct reasoning that focuses on the structure (or form) of the argument.
formal logic
109
Arguing that.a person's argument is wrong because of the person's circumstances, biases, or motivations.
circumstantial ad hominem
110
The art or skill of speaking or writing effectively and persuasively (regardless of considerations of logic or truth).
rhetoric
111
Arguing for a position on the basis that negative consequences will follow if a person does not accept the position.
appeal to force/fear
112
Claiming there are only two mutually exclusive possibilities, when there is a third option (or more).
fallacy of bifurcation
113
Those things that are required in advance; that which is necessary to a particular end.
prerequisites
114
Unbelievers too are made in the image of God, and hence have the capacity for ___ reasoning, God has given them knowledge as well.
rational
115
An argument with an unstated premise or an unstated conclusion
enthymeme