Strengths
-has standardized diagnoses
- it has created common terminology
- also incorporated empirical evidence gained from the years of research and use
- it has provided therapeutic guidance to psychiatrists
- it has created a research base and each edition has a strong empirical foundation than the last
Limitations
-Its use has resulted in misdiagnoses and overdiagnoses
-Diagnosis may lead to labelling and stigmatisation
-The DSM may be considered an oversimplification reducing the continuum of human behavior to label
-Much of the research evidence is based on western studies, thus minorities experience with mental health is not well represented
-Some of the cut- off points are seen as controversial e.g why must someone have at least 5 of the 9 symptoms of MDD to be diagnosed.
Intro
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
-produced by the american psychiatric association
- major shift from establishing causes of disorders based on the blinician’s interpretation of the client’s behvaior to describing a set of observable symprotms and trying to create classification categories taht would not overlap.
- role of theory in giagnosis was gradually rduced.
- might have made diagnosis more superficial but allowed clinicisnd to use a common language and arrive at similar diagnoses
DSM I
DSM II
(1968) triggered by attacks fro scientists and spcial activists.
- still retained alot of psychoanalytic features; it was focused more on explaining and interpreting disorders than describing them
DSM III
DSM IV
DSM III critisized for over diagnosis
- included the clinical significance criterion: symproms considered clinically significant if they created major distress or interfered with daily functioning
DSM-5
-the ulti-axia sysem was criticized for being aratifical and not reflecting realing (eliminated)
- cultural variability of symporoms
- Cu;tural formulation interview tool included to help clinicins avoid cultural bias in diagnosis