what is reduc vs hol debate
the extent to which behaviour is better studied individually or as a sum of its parts
what is reductionism
what is parsimony
the simplest possible explanation
what are the types of reductionism
topic examples
what is holism
looks at higher levels of explanations and shows how many aspects can interact together to provide a complete picture of behaviour
topic example of holism
how do level of explanations helps develop behaviour
‘the whole is better than the sum of its parts’
- simple behaviours on their own do not make sense but as they build up it all starts to work together
- centres around the extent to which each stance offers the most effective understanding of behaviour
example of building up behaviours - OCD
psychological, physical, neurochemical, physiological and societal
AO3: strength of reductionism is that it is scientific
AO3: strength of reductionism is that it has practical application
AO3: limitation of reductionism is that it uses animal testing
Pavlov’s dogs, Skinner’s box
- humans are more complex
- have high intellectual functions
- animals are too simples and lacks cognition and emotion
AO3: strength of holism is that it allows for more complex study of behaviour
e.g. Zimbardo: conformity to a social role in Stanford prison experiment for prisoners and guards could not be understood only by observing the individual
- study of interaction and social processes which isn’t possible with reductionist views