Week 4 - Big Push Flashcards
(95 cards)
What were the key ideas, strategies and policies of the Big Push according to Nurkse?
“industrial policy” and “infant industry protection” to promote investment into “increasing returns activities”
When did the Big Push happen?
1945-1970s
What were the key ideas, strategies and policies of the Big Push according to Hirschman?
import substitution industrialisation (ISI) and backward and forward linkages
What were the key ideas, strategies and policies of the Big Push according to Arthur Lewis?
mobilisation of “surplus labour” from agriculture for labour intensive manufacturing
What were the key ideas, strategies and policies of the Big Push according to Singer and Prebisch?
“unequal trade” and problem of “primary commodity exports”
Who took on the major role in the Big Push?
major role for the state to shape markets
What brought industrial policy back on the policy agenda today?
new debates throughout OECD after 2007-2008 financial crisis and again coming out of the pandemic
China’s successful deployment of industrial policy
What were four big ideas of post-war development?
“Big Push” for industrialisation
transform the relationship between agriculture and manufacturing
invest in manufacturing with attention to “forward and backward” linkages
overcome unequal arms of trade between poor and rich countries
What is a debate within the “Big Push” regarding growth?
balanced growth (simultaneous investing in many lines of manufacturing, Nurkse) vs unbalanced growth (one thing at a time, promote forward and backward linkages, Hirschmam)
What is a debate within the “Big Push” regarding financing?
finance domestically (keep TNCs at bay as tend to establish enclaves and repatriate profits, how and when to transition from ISI to production for export) vs attract foreign aid and FDI (rely on TNCs as source of technology transfer, how and when to transition from ISI to production for export)
One of the big ideas of post-war development is industrialisation, what does this involve?
industrial policy
“infant industry” protection in manufacturing sector
planning, as long-term view is needed
direct finance (including aid and foreign investment) to productive sectors
need for a “big push”, which requires “critical mass of investment” and “balanced growth”
depart from price signals (as they are slow and short-term and do not capture externalities)
import-substitution industrialisation
What are policy moves to promote industrialisation?
tariffs to protect infant industries
control foreign exchange to use for priority investment
overvalue currency to discourage primary exports and favour production for domestic market
state control of finance
incentives/compulsion on foreign firms to invest in priority sectors
subsidies to private firms in priority sectors
state directly established firms where private sector found it too risky, or where private sector was absent
What is Lewis’ Two Sector Model?
1) traditional rural subsistence “surplus labour”
2) high productivity modern urban industrial sector, absorbs labour from rural areas
What is the unlimited supply of labour (Lewis)?
disguised unemployment in rural areas, e.g. West Indies, Egypt and India’s government needed to invest in manufacturing to absorb this labour, where there were no private investors to do the job
labour shortage due to abundant land, e.g. Ghana’s government needed to invest in raising agricultural productivity to release labour for manufacturing without driving up wages, which would discourage investment in manufacturing
match the state intervention with the specific market failure
What happens to the wage rate as surplus labour is absorbed?
wage rate rises as surplus labour is absorbed (has been happening in China over past 20 years)
One of the big ideas of post-war development is “forward and backward” linkages (Hirschman), what does this involve?
new industry with eye on both
backward linkages which promote production of inputs for the industry
forward linkages which utilise its outputs in new activities (harder)
substitute imports with goods produced at home
One of the big ideas of post-war development is overcome unequal terms of trade, what do Singer and Prebisch say about this?
critique of dependence on export of primary commodities (terms of trade unfavourable)
differences in gains from technological improvement (industrialised countries were consumers of primary commodities and producers of manufactured articles, underdeveloped countries were consumers of manufacturers and producers of raw materials)
What did Prebisch say in his 1949 ECLA Manifesto?
developing countries face declining terms of trade, leading to unequal development
workers in industrial countries capture all gains from productivity improvement
dual economy (modern and traditional)
What did the ECLA say on the role of the “smart state”?
not against agriculture, trade, or private sector
reduce technological disparity
promote high return investments (e.g. steel)
implement exchange controls
endorse “healthy protectionism”
attract FDI
boost savings and investment
wage policy to boost demand (as per Keynes)
What was ECLA’s blind spot?
backing away from redistributive agrarian reform even though in favour, as it was politically sensitive issue
What was land redistributions role in the “Big Push”?
gave way to exclusive focus on raising agricultural productivity while bringing social justice and changing the balance of power
increase rural incomes by investing in education and health and creating demand for manufactured goods
could remove speculation on and accumulation of land as a strategy by elites (could free them to invest in risky but higher return activities in manufacturing)
could increase political and social power of small farmers and reduce or eliminate rural elite’s political power
land reform was seen as politically unacceptable
What was Latin America’s experience with industrialisation?
Brazil had great advance in 1950s and 1960s (early ISI, heavy industries, developmentalist ideology, succumbed to political crisis)
most of Latin America was different, half-hearted (no move from consumer to producer goods, improved consumption but not production, finishing touches on imported products, TNCs often the main beneficiaries)
What was India’s experience with industrialisation?
national planning boards, industrial development corporations, input-output analysis, growth models, built heavy industry
did not work well
Why did India’s industrialisation experience not work well?
bureaucrats were generalists
federalism undermined central state
propertied groups stayed in power
business families were more powerful than state
domestic market constraint meant no land reform
protected industries were inefficient as they were not subjected to competition