cognitive neuroscience Flashcards
(319 cards)
1.
what is phrenology and which view does it take
who invented it?
lecture 1
measuring bumps on the **skull to predict mental traits, the localizationist’s view (traits are highly localized**, baso-depending on where bump is)
gall
do have some localisation but conclusions were wrong
phrenology related
what is aggregate field theory
who studied this theory and why?
lecture 1
behavioural abilities are mediated by **interactions of areas from the entire brain **( not dif bumps so opposes phrenology)
marie jean pierre flourens, had bad traits from phrenology reading so wanted to disprove…
beak
who studied aggregate field theory and what study did they do
lecture 1
**marie-jean-pierre flourens,
lesioned (damaging/removing) certain parts of the pigeon brain, without finding evidence for specific behavioural defectits by any of the lesions
epil
whos idea also led to the localizationist’s view and what did he do
lecture 1
John Hughlings Jackson monitored epilepsy patients and realized that seizures often resulted in **‘ordered’ **jerks of the muscles. This led to the idea of a **topographic organization of muscle representation in the cortex ** (start in one part of the brain and spread to other parts of the brain in order, muscles represented in an orderly manor in cortex= topographic organisation) – localizationist’s view so similar to phrenology
the homunculus in the motor cortex
the face hands thing around brain, dif parts of brain dif parts of body
b and w
support for localizationist’s view
lecture 1
Broca (speech prod.) and Wernicke (speech comp) were able to associate specific language production and comprehension deficits with specific brain lesions of a dead patient
b- cell staining
support for localizationist’s view
Novel cell staining techniques allowed Broadman to subdivide the human cortex into different cytoarchitectonic (some had big neurons some had smaller) areas
- stain indiv neurons, could identify 52 dif areas of brain
before The neuron doctrine ppl thought…
who believed this
neurons are part of one large syncitium , i.e. neurons are not separate units
Freud (along with many others)
golgi believed….
cajal debated… leading to the ….
in the **reticular theory **(neurons are part of one large syncitium- i.e. neurons are not separate units) by staining neurons, the golgi stain (only stains a fraction of neurons, )
cajal used golgis staining method to find neurons are individual, discrete cells and communicate via synapses
neurone doctrine
golgi theory=
cajal theory=
reticular theory
neuron doctrine
The Psychological Perspective
when did it start and when did it flourish
aka. BEH….
who started beh…
started in 1890’s and flourished in mid 1900’s
Thorndike and Watson were instrumental in developing the foundations of behaviourism, arguing that **Learning and conditioning **are the main (sole) determinants of all behaviour. This was crystalized in the teachings of B.F. Skinner.
concepts of behaviourism:
who did behaviourism=
Only measurable facts are the subject of scientific inquiry.
Introspection or analysis of internal (cognitive or emotive) states are non scientific.
In its extreme form it is the belief that internal states do not exist. That all living creatures are pure stimulus response ‘machines’ that can be programmed/re-programmed by appropriate conditioning.
= watson and skinner = operant (skinner bird box) pavlov= classical
type of conditioning
skinner =
pavlov=
operant conditioning
classical conditioning
limitations of behaviourism
Inability to explain **llanguage or provide insights into perception, emotion, memory, decision making.
cant teach a pigion to speak, therefore have ton move on because not everything can be taught/ conditioned
who went against behaviourism?
what did they realise?
in particular…
leading to… which asked…
- miller and chompsky
- not all learning can be explained conditioning
- language cannot be learned simply through conditioning, but requires a brain that has evolved to enable the complex operations.
- Cognitive Neuroscience- what r the underlying brain mechanisms ???
Phrenology supported the aggregate field theory. true/false?
false
Broca’s findings supported a localizationist’s view. true/false?
true
Behaviourism argued that the neural bases of emotions can be inferred from behaviour.
true/false?
false
Cognitive Neuroscience is the same as Cognitive Psychology.
true/false?
false- because CP didnt try to understand underlying brain mechanisms at the start the ‘black box’
What is phrenology, what has it taught us, where was it right, where was it wrong?
bumps in brain, size= importance of traits, taught us about localization of brain function, wrong conclusions about traits
What is the difference between the localizationist’s and the aggregate field’s point of view? What is the evidence in favour of these views?
The localizationist point of view argues that specific mental functions and cognitive processes are localized to distinct, specialized areas of the brain vs
The aggregate field perspective suggests that the* brain functions as a whole, with cognitive functions being distributed across the brain rather than confined to specific regions.*
What is the neuron doctrine, who supported it?
the neuron is the basic structural and functional unit of the nervous system, neurons are individual
cajal
What is behaviourism? What are its limitations?
no internal state, machines, everything can be conditioned/taught
not everything can be learned
eg. language
cognition= mental activity=
Pick up from external world and transform