3.1 overall
Global influence is contested in a number of different economic, environmental and political spheres.
How will superpowers exploit physical resources - look at the arctic
Contested Arctic:
Gas prices + oil prices
Gas prices rising from 65p in march 2021, to 282p per therm in march 2022
Oil prices from 30 dollar in 2016, to 105 in 2022
Why even get resources?
Env impacts of getting impacts
How do u get resources?
Challenges of getting resources
Why is the arctic in particular contested?
Disputes over arctic land
Arctic losses
In 2010, loss of arctic canoe ice and over a estimated it cost world 61 billion - 731 in lost climate cooling services
ARCTIC WARMING
Since 1951 arctic has warmed roughly twice as much as global average, a 2 oC increase in temp would mean 3-6 oC rise in arctic
3.2 overall
When does physical space create political tension - china and spratly islands
Chinese claims
Spheres of
Influence
What are spheres of influence
Who else is affected by sphere of influence
What might get u conflict within spheres of influence
Spratly islands - who cares
Resolving spratly dispute
Overall is china a threat
Potential economic threat from china
• Major player in global manufacturing
- Key global leader in some sectors e.g. renewable energy
• Generates wealth and rising incomes, although a fraction of the USA on a per capita basis;
• Lacks global brands
• China’s economic power might be judged as its most significant source of power
Chine political power
• A lack of internal democracy and openness - viewed with suspicion by traditional Western powers,
• A lack of willingness to act globally unless its direct interests are threatened
• Could say that not getting involved is strength, allowing China to focus on its own development
China cultural threat
• Much less global influence – less than India
• But the Beijing Olympics in 2008 did give China a global stage;
• Lack of global brands means it’s cultural reach is relatively small though
China military threat
• Some way behind the USA; a large standing army and air force,
• Lacks the global naval military reach of USA, but is developing
• A nuclear armed power which gives it a seat at the ‘top table