2.4.2 Validity Flashcards
(14 cards)
what is Internal Validity?
The study measures what it intends to measure (as confounding variables have been controlled and will not affect the results)
what is External Validity?
Whether the study paints a true picture of real-life behaviours (mundane realism) and would apply to different places, different times, or different people (population validity).
what are the 3 validity issues?
- researcher bias
- demand characteristics
- social desirability
what is Researcher Bias
The researcher directly or indirectly influences the results of a study, through the process of designing the study or through the way the research is conducted/analysed
what are Demand Characteristics
participants unconsciously work out the aim and act differently
what is Social Desirability
Participants give the response that they think will show them in the best possible light, meaning they are not a true reflection of their thoughts/feelings.
how do you deal with researcher bias?
Double-blind procedure helps overcome researcher bias.
- Neither the researcher nor the participant knows the true aims of the study.
- Reduces demand characteristics
(participants altering behaviour based on perceived aims).
how can single blind procedures reduce validity issues
Single-blind procedure helps reduce:
- Social desirability bias.
- Demand characteristics.
- Participants are unaware of the research hypothesis until after participation.
how can you deal with general issues with validity
- Independent groups design can also help reduce validity issues.
- Anonymity and confidentiality in responses can increase the validity of the data.
assessing validity: Face Validity
Whether the test appears (at face value) to measure what it claims to, and hence is objective.
- Tests where the purpose is clear, even to naïve respondents, are said to have high face validity.
assessing validity: Predictive Validity
The degree to which a test accurately forecasts a future outcome on a more broadly related topic
Do the findings apply in different and more varied situations?
assessing validity: Content Validity
objectively checking whether the method of measuring behaviour is accurate and decides whether it is a fair test that achieves the aims of the study (internal validity).
- This can be achieved by asking an expert in that specific area of behaviour to check the validity
assessing validity: Concurrent Validity
Validating a measurement by comparing it with an established measurement that has known validity.
- If similar results occur on both tests, then the new test has concurrent validity.
- If not, then the new test would have to be redesigned and tested.
assessing validity: Construct Validity
looks at whether the overall results reflect the phenomena as a whole (external validity)
It is achieved by checking the existing definitions of the behaviour being studied and redesigning the test if it measures a different construct