2.7.8 Inferential Stats Flashcards

(13 cards)

1
Q

which stats test is appropriate for the stroop/imp. investigation

A

Spearmans correlation coeffeicient (P also signified by Rs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

why is Spearmans appropriate for the stroop/imp. investigation

A
  • measures the strength and direction of association between two ranked variables
  • The study was looking for a relationship between the co-variables of impulsiveness and stroop performance
  • Both scores from the stroop test and impulsivity scale were analysed at an ordinal level
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is the purpose of carrying out a stats test

A
  • The purpose of carrying out a stats test is to generate the observed value (calculated value)
    > Once you have OV, you can then check this OV against a critical value
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what are the 3 factors for your correlation?

A
  1. Level of significance: 0.05
  2. Number of participants
  3. direction of alternative hypothesis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explain what the 5% level of significance means and why you chose it for your correlation

A

If the results of the study were found to be significant at the 5% level of significance it means if the study was carried out 100 times, 95% of the time the result would support the directional / non-directional hypothesis (alternative hypothesis)

5% level of significance = minimum acceptable level for deciding if the results are significant
- less likely to make a type 1 or type 2 error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what happens if there is less than 5% probability

A

If there is a less than 5% probability, the results are due to chance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is a type 1 error

A

when the null hypothesis is rejected when it is in facture
> happens when using 10% level which is too lenient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is a type 2 error

A

when the null hypothesis is retained when it should have been rejected > happens when we use a stricter level of significance (e.g. 1%)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how do you know if the hypothesis is accepted

A

If the observed value is smaller than the critical value the result is not significant and the null is accepted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

how do you know if the hypothesis is rejected

A

If the observed (calculated) value is equal to or greater than the critical value, this means the results of the correlation are significant, so the null hypothesis would be rejected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what were the results from your Spearmans test

A

observed value = 0.365
critical value (Dir. hyp.) = 0.564
critical value (Non-Dir. hyp.) = 0.648

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is your statement of significance

A

As the observed value of 0.365 was smaller and the critical value of 0.648 at the 0.05 level of significance the result is not significant and the null hypothesis is retained

Results show there is a small positive correlation between the co-variables of stroop performance and impulsiveness scores as measured using Barratt impulsiveness scale, however it is not a significant correlation relationship

Therefore there is no significant relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly