2.5.1 Milgram: Methodology & Procedures Flashcards
(14 cards)
what is the aim of Milgrams study
To investigate whether ordinary people would obey an authority figure when asked to perform action that conflict with their personal conscience
describe the sample used in Milgram
- 40 male participants
- aged between 20-50 years old
- participants came from a range of occupations and educational backgrounds
how was the sample recruited for Milgram
- they were recruited through a newspaper advertisement
- offered payment ($4.50) for participating in study about ‘memory and learning’
what was the sampling method used in Milgram
- volunteer sampling
- selection was random
what was the setting in Milgrams study
setting: Yale University - adds legitamacy
- ptps told they were taking part in a study on the effects of punishment on learning
what was the role assignment in Milgrams study
role assingment: ptps always the teacher, confederate always the learner
- roles were assigned using a fixed draw but appeared random to the ptps
what was the task in Milgrams study
- the teacher was instructed to read word pairs and test the learner memory
- for each incorrect answer, teacher would administer an electric shock
> voltage increased by 15V increments
what were the shock levels and labels in Milgrams study
ranged from 15V to 450V
300V = strong shock
330V = intense shock
450V= XXX/Danger: severe shock
what was the reality of the shocks in Milgram
- no actual shocks were given (learner was never harmed)
- learners reactions (shouting, banging on wall) were pre-recorded/scripted
- a sample shock (45V) was administered to convince ptps that shocks were real
what were the experiment prompts in Milgrams study
- “please continue”
- “the experiment requires that you continue”
- “it is absolutely essential that you continue”
- “you have no other choice, you must go on”
- the first 3 = emphasis on obedience to science
- the last one = refers to learner, invoking moral conflict
what were the factors affecting obedience
- proximity
- location
- uniform
how did proximity affect obedience in Milgrams study
- same room = 62.5% obedience
- different rooms = 40% obedience (coudlnt see each other)
- touch-proximity = 30% (physically placing learner hand onto shock plate)
how did location affect obedience in Milgrams study
- yale university added sense of trust and legitamacy
- when moved to rundown office building, obedience decreased to 47.5%
how did uniform affect obedience in Milgrams study
- lab coat in og study = scientific authority
- normal clothes = sig. drop in obedience
> shows power of symbolic authority - demand characteristics = stronger in normal clothes condition
> suspected a study and no real