EXM1.2

Question 1

(4) Elements of enforcing & Reporting Violations of Professional Standards Among Colleges

( I-DC-P&P-UCC )

Answer 1

I = Inaction

DC = Direct Confrontation

P&P = Policy & Procedure

UCC = Utilizing Chain of Command

Question 2

(4) Things That Make Up The Foundation of Quality Law Enforcement

( HM VPE)

Answer 2

(1) - HM = High Morals

(2) - V = Values

(3) - P = Principles

(4) - E = Ethics

Question 3

(3) Things For Writing Use of Force Reports

( FNC - ONS - T&E )

Answer 3

(1) - FNC = Facts NOT Conclusions

(2) - ONS = Objective NOT Subjective

(3) - T&E =2.718 Training & Experience

Question 4

Graham Factors (4)

( SCITAR AE AF )

Answer 4

(1) - SC = Severity of Crime

(2) - IT = Immediate Threat

(3) - AR = Actively Resisting

(4) - AEAF = Attempting to Evade Arrest Flight

Question 5

(4) Parts of Intemperance

( A L G PP )

Answer 5

(1) - Anger
(2) - Lust
(3) - Greed
(4) - Peer Pressure

Question 6

Six Pillars of Character

( TRR + JF + C + CVC )

Answer 6

T = Trustworthiness
R = Respect
R = Responsibility

JF = Justice & Fairness

C = Caring

CVC = Civic Virtue & Citizenship

Question 7

In Graham V. Connor Who drove Dethorne Graham to the convenient store for some orange juice?

Answer 7

William Berry

Question 8

In what case was evidence from a pumped stomach thrown out to convict a suspect because it violated “due process”?

Answer 8

Rochin v. California

Question 9

Does Graham v. Connor govern “medical neglect” during a seizure?

Answer 9

No

It governs use of force and excessive force

Question 10

What case law governs “excessive force” during a seizure?

Answer 10

Graham v. Connor

Question 11

What case law establishes “Shocks the conscience” standard for due process?

Answer 11

Rochin v. California

Question 12

What case law defines “Deliberate Indifference” for medical needs?

Answer 12

Estelle v. Gamble

Question 13

What Idaho case law has to do with “Due Process”?

Answer 13

State v. Lankford

Question 14

Is “Qualified Immunity” for law enforcement officers from civil liability covered under 42 USC 1983?

Answer 14

Yes

Question 15

What (2) elements must a plaintiff prove in court for a claim of “excessive force”?

Answer 15

First, that officer violated a constitutional right,

and;

second, the right was clearly established at the time of incident

Question 16

What case law establishes the framework of “Qualified Immunity”?

Answer 16

Harlow v. Fitzgerald

Question 17

What case law established “The 2 prong Test” for “Qualified Immunity”?

Answer 17

Saucier v. Katz

Question 18

What Idaho case law addresses “Proportionality” of force?

Answer 18

State v. Araiza

Question 19

What part of the mind communicates through feelings & Emotions?

Answer 19

Sub-conscience Mind

Question 20

What part of the mind communicates using “Rationalization” and the “analysis” of a given situation?

Answer 20

The Conscience Mind

Question 21

What part of the mind is limited on the amount of information it can focus on at one time?

Answer 21

The Conscience Mind

Question 22

Idaho Code 7-1403

Answer 22

Family Law License Suspension

Question 23

This standard assesses actions from the perspective of a reasonable officer at the scene, factoring in elements like the severity of the crime, immediate threat, and suspect’s resistance or evasion, ensuring decisions align with constitutional protections and Idaho Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) guidelines.

Answer 23

The Objective Reasonable Person Standard

Question 24

Legal test used to evaluate whether a law enforcement officer’s actions, such as the use of force, were reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, based on how a hypothetical reasonable person (or officer) would act in the same circumstances, considering ____ __________ ____ _____ _______________.

Answer 24

The Objective Reasonable Person Standard

“The Totality of the Circumstances”

Question 25

Legal standard in Idaho and federal law, defined as the conscious or reckless disregard of a known or obvious risk of serious harm to another person, particularly in contexts like failing to provide adequate medical care or safety to inmates or detainees, violating their Eighth or Fourteenth Amendment rights

Answer 25

Deliberate Indifference

Question 26

In Idaho, ______________ _________________ requires more than mere negligence; it involves actual awareness or willful blindness to a substantial risk, often applied in cases of prison conditions or medical neglect, and can lead to liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 or Idaho Code § 6-904 for tort claims

Answer 26

Deliberate Indifference

Question 27

U.S. Supreme Court case holding that law enforcement officers may use deadly force only when a suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others or when necessary to prevent escape of a dangerous felon. It established that deadly force to prevent escape is unconstitutional unless the officer has probable cause to believe the suspect poses an immediate threat.

Answer 27

Tennessee v. Garner

Question 28

A federal case where the court upheld the denial of qualified immunity to police officers who used excessive force and failed to provide medical care to suspect., resulting in his death by asphyxiation during an arrest. The court found that the officers’ actions violated clearly established Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights

Answer 28

Estate of Owensby v. Cincinnati

Question 29

U.S. Supreme Court case establishing that the reasonableness of a law enforcement officer’s use of force must be judged under the Fourth Amendment’s “objective reasonableness” standard, based on the totality of circumstances. The court outlined three factors: the severity of the crime, whether the suspect poses an immediate threat, and whether the suspect is actively resisting or evading arrest.

Answer 29

Graham v. Connor

Question 30

occurs when a law enforcement officer, through physical force or a show of authority, intentionally restricts a person’s freedom of movement, and the person submits or is physically restrained, as determined by an objective reasonable person standard

Answer 30

Seizure

Question 31

This includes arrests, traffic stops, or Terry stops where an officer’s actions (e.g., activating lights, issuing commands, or using handcuffs) would make a reasonable person feel they are not free to leave, provided the suspect complies or is detained, per Idaho and federal law.

Answer 31

Seizure

Question 32

What is the (3) Prong Test from Graham v. Connor?

Answer 32

The Objective Reasonableness Standard “Test” (1) - The Severity of the Crime (2) - Immediate Threat (3) - Actively Resisting

Question 33

(3) Items for a Use of Force Report

Answer 33

(1) - Facts NOT Conclusions (2) - Objective NOT Subjective (3) - Experience & Training

Question 34

What is the difference between Objective & Subjective?

Answer 34

Subjective refers to an officer’s personal intentions, beliefs, or motivations (e.g., what they actually thought or felt) objective refers to what a hypothetical reasonable officer would perceive or do in the same circumstances, judged by external facts and standards without regard to the officer’s internal state, as required by the Fourth Amendment’s reasonableness test