EXM2.CreightonVer Flashcards

(32 cards)

1
Q

Define Reasonable Suspicion

A

More than a mere hunch Strong suspicion based upon articulable facts or circumstances that a crime has been, is being, or is about to be committed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

(3) Types of Officer / Citizen Encounters and their Burdens of Proof

A

(1) Voluntary / Consensual = No BOP
(2) Temporary Detention = RS BOP
(3) Arrest = PC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Terry Stops

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Detentions

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Different Types of “Seizures”

A

A Seizure is taking

Investigative Detention = seizure
Arrest = seizure
Consensual contact or voluntary = NO seizure

De facto arrest describes a seizure of an individual that exceeds the bounds of an investigative detention

Arrest Warrant = Seizure of person named, commanded by judge

Seizing evidence from subject’s body – usually need a warrant or consent.

(1) Use of emergency LIGHTS
(2) Use of display of WEAPONS
(3) PHYSICAL TOUCHING by officer
(4) NUMBER of officers present
(5) Verbal Commands / Non-Verbal Messaging
(6) BLOCKING of exits or pathways

Relies on whether a reasonable person would have felt free to disregard the police, decline the officers request, or otherwise terminate the encounter

A seizure by force — absent of submission — only lasts as long as the application of force

An officers use of a flashlight at night does not qualify as a seizure

A traffic stop is a seizure as long as the officer had reasonable suspicion that a violation occurred

During a traffic stop an officer must use the least intrusive means reasonably available to verify or dispel their suspicions in a short period of time, other wise risk an unreasonable seizure

During a voluntary or consensual encounter NO Seizure has occurred

During a welfare check if an officer refuses to let someone leave without identifying themselves it would constitute an illegal seizure of that person

Courts have determined an unlawful seizure occurred when an officer initiated his overhead lights when the purpose of the contact was community caretaking

Context is everything with a seizure

the plain view doctrine applies to warrantless seizures of items while lawfully in a constitutionally protected area

search and seizure of abandoned property is excluded from the warrant requirement

Standing - the defendant has the threshold burden to show that a search or seizure occurred which
infringed on his or her reasonable or legitimate expectation of privacy in the area searched
or property seized.

A Seizure must comply with 4th amendment and be “reasonableness” — it must be justified by reasonable suspicion or probable cause

Under the automobile exception “there is no requirement that the warrantless search of a
vehicle occur contemporaneously with its seizure.”

The plain view doctrine applies to seizures of items observed in plain view while lawfully in
a constitutionally protected area — from a lawful vantage point, there has been no invasion of a person’s legitimate expectation of privacy in allowing seizure of the contraband or evidence.

A warrantless search or seizure may be justified due to exigent circumstances

The impoundment of an automobile constitutes a seizure, and therefore, it must comply with the 4th Amendment standards of reasonableness.

The Mystery of Search & Seizure — like the Mystery of the Dead Cat — is solved by considering the totality of the circumstances and placing facts in the right context.

An arrest is any seizure exceeding the permissible bounds of a stop

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Ways you can detain someone

A

Reasonable suspicion is information which is sufficient to cause an officer to reasonably
believe the person to be detained

An officer’s decision to detain cannot be predicated upon a mere “hunch,” but must be based upon
articulable facts describing suspicious behavior which would distinguish the defendant
from an ordinary, law-abiding citizen

An officer may stop and detain an individual if, based upon the totality of
the circumstances, the officer has a reasonable suspicion, based on specific and
articulable facts, that the suspect has been, is currently, or is about to engage in
criminal activity

May not be detained with individuals charged with or convicted of a crime. - Adult mental holds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What Constitutes a seizure

A

Relies on whether a reasonable person would have felt free to disregard the police, decline the officers request, or otherwise terminate the encounter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Idaho Constitution version of US 4th Amendment

A

Article 1 section 17

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Whats happens during a traffic stop

A

Reasonable Suspicion is used to seize a person in their vehicle long enough for the officer to determine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Know when and how you can do a “Terry Stop”

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

When does Miranda Apply and when do you need to read it

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Doctrines

A

Open View
Plain View
Buie Sweep
Search Incident to arrest doctrine
Plain Smell
Collective Knowledge Doctrine
Open Fields
Open Air
Plain Feel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Mapp v. Ohio

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Chimel v. California

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Terry v. Ohio

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Weeks v. US

17
Q

Who can serve warrants?

A

Peace officers

18
Q

Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement

19
Q

Consequences for Officers who do things wrong

A

(1) Effect on Criminal Prosecutions
(2) Criminal Liability (18-703 + 18-2901 =-3,568 Misdemeanors)
(3) Civil Liability
(4) Department Discipline

18-703 - Misdemeanor / 18-2901 - Misdemeanor / 42 USC 1983

PDF - Pg. 135

20
Q

Evidence

21
Q

Miranda v. Arizona

22
Q

Rules of Evidence

A

All evidence must be = Admissible

Relevant + Competent + Legally Obtained ( Must have all 3)

Hearsay Rule

Hearsay statements are NOT admissible except as provided by the Rules of Evidence.

Hearsay is an OUT-OF-COURT statement offered for the truth of the matter.

The Idaho Rules of Evidence allow for two kinds of opinion evidence, lay and expert opinions.

404b Evidience - allows state to introduce evidence of prior bad acts into evidence

An admission by a defendant is considered a non-hearsay statement

23
Q

Types of Witnesses

24
Q

Levels of Courts and what they rule over

25
Meth in any amount is?
Felony
26
Different types of Trials
Jury & Bench Trials
27
State v. Gant
28
Stave v. Bell
29
Clarke Rule
30
CREW
31
OIC
32