Reasonable suspicion is defined as:
A. Evidence is highly and substantially more likely to be true than untrue
B. More likely than not the suspect committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime
C. A mere hunch, speculation or guess that the suspect has committed or is committing a crime
D. None of the above are correct
Question 1 - EXAM2:
B. More likely than not the suspect committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime
Which of the following is a right under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution?
A. Right to ask questions
B. Right to Bail
C. Right to an Attorney
D. All of the above are correct
Question 2 - EXAM2:
C. Right to an Attorney
An officer walks up to a person at the city park and begins to casually speak with this person. This is called a(n):
A. Investigatory Stop
B. Consensual Encounter
C. Temporary Detention
D. None of the above are correct
Question 3 - EXAM2
B. Consensual Encounter
A peace officer turns on her siren to stop the car in front of her. This is called a(n):
A. Arrest
B. Consensual Encounter
C. Temporary Detention
D. None of the above are correct
Question 4 - EXAM2
C. Temporary Detention
During a consensual encounter between an officer and citizen, the required burden of proof under the 4th Amendment is:
A. Reasonable Suspicion
B. Probable Cause
C. Beyond a Reasonable Doubt
D. The 4th Amendment does not apply
Question 5 - EXAM2
D. The 4th Amendment does not apply
The Fourth Amendment equivalent in the Idaho Constitution is found in:
A. Article 1, Section 17
B. Article 2, Section 7
C. Article 3, Section 19
D. None of the above are correct
Question 6 - EXAM2
A. Article 1, Section 17
Examples of circumstances that MIGHT indicate a seizure even when the person felt free to leave the encounter include:
A. The use of overhead emergency lights
B. The officer physically touching the person
C. The presence of several officers
D. All of the above are correct
Question 7 - EXAM2
D. All of the above are correct
Ordinary inquiries incident to a traffic stop may include:
A. Demanding the driver’s license of the driver
B. Inspecting the automobile’s registration and proof of insurance
C. Determining whether there are outstanding warrants against the driver
D. All of the above are correct
Question 8 - EXAM2
D. All of the above are correct
Factors supporting a “Terry Frisk” include:
A. Bulges in suspect’s clothing resembling a vape pen
B. Reputation of being dangerous
C. Encounter happens during the day time
D. Both A and C are correct
Question 9 - EXAM2
B. Reputation of being dangerous
Which of the following is TRUE?
A. All statements made by a suspect while in custody requires a Miranda warning
B. Handcuffs mean a person is immediately under arrest
C. Application of physical force to the suspect’s body is likely a seizure
D. All of the above are true
Question 10 - EXAM2
D. All of the above are true
The Miranda case deals mostly with the duty of police to protect the rights of the accused as guaranteed by which constitutional amendment?
A. First Amendment
B. Fourth Amendment
C. Fifth Amendment
D. Sixth Amendment
Question 11 - EXAM2
C. Fifth Amendment
Which of the following is/are warning(s) provided to suspects under Miranda?
A. The right to an attorney
B. The right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure
C. The right to not speak with officers
D. Both A and C are correct
Question 12 - EXAM2
D. Both A and C are correct
Interrogation, as used in Miranda, is best defined as:
A. Direct questioning about a crime under investigation
B. Indirect words or actions by an officer that could reasonably lead to an incriminating response
C. General booking questions
D. Both A and B are correct
Question 13 - EXAM2
D. Both A and B are correct
In order for Miranda to apply in police investigations:
A. A suspect must be in custody
B. A suspect must be asked incriminating questions
C. The person asking questions is a government agent
D. All of the above are required
Question 14 - EXAM2
D. All of the above are required
Which of the following is/are correct in relation to the Supreme Court’s decision in Miranda v. Arizona?
A. A suspect must be informed of his/her Miranda rights before an in-custody interrogation
B. The suspect must knowingly and intelligently waive his rights
C. Miranda rights can be waived, but only in writing
D. Both A and B are correct
Question 15 - EXAM2
D. Both A and B are correct
The “Fruit of the Poisonous Tree” doctrine refers to the exclusion of:
A. Inculpatory evidence
B. Exculpatory evidence
C. Legally obtained evidence
D. Evidence discovered as a result of a constitutional violation
Question 16 - EXAM2
D. Evidence discovered as a result of a constitutional violation
This exception to the “Fruit of the Poisonous Tree” doctrine is NOT recognized in Idaho state courts:
A. Independent Source
B. Inevitable Discovery
C. Good Faith
D. None of the above are recognized
Question 17 - EXAM 2
C. Good Faith
Chimel v. California introduced this 4th Amendment legal concept:
A. Abandoned Property
B. The vehicle frisk
C. The lunge area
D. Frisks of suspicious persons
Question 18 - EXAM2
C. The lunge area
Weeks v. U.S. introduced this 4th Amendment legal concept:
A. The Exclusionary Rule
B. The Grab Area Rule
C. The Right to Counsel
D. The Good Faith Rule
Question 19 - EXAM2
A. The Exclusionary Rule
An officer stops a person on the street that she knows to have been previously involved with drugs. The officer searches the person and pulls a bag of meth out of the person’s right front pocket. The officer:
A. Has violated the person’s 4th amendment rights and the evidence is subject to the exclusionary rule
B. Has acted in good faith, so the exclusionary rule does not apply
C. Has legal grounds to search, so the exclusionary rule does not apply
D. The exclusionary rule does not apply to 4th Amendment violations
Question 20 - EXAM2
A. Has violated the person’s 4th amendment rights and the evidence is subject to the exclusionary rule
Which of the following scenarios qualifies as a “Plain View” exception to the search warrant requirement?
A. Officer has lawful access to the location where the meth pipe is seen, because the homeowner invited the officer into the living room
B. Officer has lawful right of access to the gun safe listed on a valid search warrant, but inside the safe is a drug ledger
C. Officer has a search warrant to look for imitation Rolex watches, but right next to the boxes of Rolex watches are Coach handbags. It is immediately apparent the Coach handbags may be imitations as well, so the officer seizes these boxes as well
D. All of the above qualify as “Plain View”
Question 21 - EXAM2
D. All of the above qualify as “Plain View”
The general punishment for a felony, unless otherwise stated in the specific statute, is a maximum punishment of:
A. Five years in the state prison and/or fine of $50,000
B. One year in the county jail and/or fine of $5,000
C. Five years in the county jail and/or fine of $50,000
D. Ten years in the state prison and/or fine of $50,000
Question 22 - EXAM2
A. Five years in the state prison and/or fine of $50,000
Maliciously destroying jointly-owned property becomes a felony when the damages exceed?
A. $250
B. $350
C. $1,000
D. Not “Malicious Injury to Property” because it is jointly owned
Question 23 - EXAM2
C. $1,000
Fred willfully and unlawfully, by fire, damages an unoccupied dwelling. If proven beyond a reasonable doubt, Fred would be found guilty of:
A. First Degree Arson
B. Second Degree Arson
C. Third Degree Arson
D. Aggravated Arson
Question 24 - EXAM2
B. Second Degree Arson