MidtermTestReviews(2) Flashcards

(57 cards)

1
Q

Reasonable suspicion is defined as:

A. Evidence is highly and substantially more likely to be true than untrue

B. More likely than not the suspect committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime

C. A mere hunch, speculation or guess that the suspect has committed or is committing a crime

D. None of the above are correct

Question 1 - EXAM2:

A

B. More likely than not the suspect committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Which of the following is a right under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution?

A. Right to ask questions

B. Right to Bail

C. Right to an Attorney

D. All of the above are correct

Question 2 - EXAM2:

A

C. Right to an Attorney

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

An officer walks up to a person at the city park and begins to casually speak with this person. This is called a(n):

A. Investigatory Stop

B. Consensual Encounter

C. Temporary Detention

D. None of the above are correct

Question 3 - EXAM2

A

B. Consensual Encounter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

A peace officer turns on her siren to stop the car in front of her. This is called a(n):

A. Arrest

B. Consensual Encounter

C. Temporary Detention

D. None of the above are correct

Question 4 - EXAM2

A

C. Temporary Detention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

During a consensual encounter between an officer and citizen, the required burden of proof under the 4th Amendment is:

A. Reasonable Suspicion

B. Probable Cause

C. Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

D. The 4th Amendment does not apply

Question 5 - EXAM2

A

D. The 4th Amendment does not apply

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The Fourth Amendment equivalent in the Idaho Constitution is found in:

A. Article 1, Section 17
B. Article 2, Section 7
C. Article 3, Section 19
D. None of the above are correct

Question 6 - EXAM2

A

A. Article 1, Section 17

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Examples of circumstances that MIGHT indicate a seizure even when the person felt free to leave the encounter include:

A. The use of overhead emergency lights
B. The officer physically touching the person
C. The presence of several officers
D. All of the above are correct

Question 7 - EXAM2

A

D. All of the above are correct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Ordinary inquiries incident to a traffic stop may include:

A. Demanding the driver’s license of the driver
B. Inspecting the automobile’s registration and proof of insurance
C. Determining whether there are outstanding warrants against the driver
D. All of the above are correct

Question 8 - EXAM2

A

D. All of the above are correct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Factors supporting a “Terry Frisk” include:

A. Bulges in suspect’s clothing resembling a vape pen
B. Reputation of being dangerous
C. Encounter happens during the day time
D. Both A and C are correct

Question 9 - EXAM2

A

B. Reputation of being dangerous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which of the following is TRUE?

A. All statements made by a suspect while in custody requires a Miranda warning
B. Handcuffs mean a person is immediately under arrest
C. Application of physical force to the suspect’s body is likely a seizure
D. All of the above are true

Question 10 - EXAM2

A

D. All of the above are true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The Miranda case deals mostly with the duty of police to protect the rights of the accused as guaranteed by which constitutional amendment?

A. First Amendment
B. Fourth Amendment
C. Fifth Amendment
D. Sixth Amendment

Question 11 - EXAM2

A

C. Fifth Amendment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Which of the following is/are warning(s) provided to suspects under Miranda?

A. The right to an attorney
B. The right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure
C. The right to not speak with officers
D. Both A and C are correct

Question 12 - EXAM2

A

D. Both A and C are correct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Interrogation, as used in Miranda, is best defined as:

A. Direct questioning about a crime under investigation
B. Indirect words or actions by an officer that could reasonably lead to an incriminating response
C. General booking questions
D. Both A and B are correct

Question 13 - EXAM2

A

D. Both A and B are correct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

In order for Miranda to apply in police investigations:

A. A suspect must be in custody
B. A suspect must be asked incriminating questions
C. The person asking questions is a government agent
D. All of the above are required

Question 14 - EXAM2

A

D. All of the above are required

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Which of the following is/are correct in relation to the Supreme Court’s decision in Miranda v. Arizona?

A. A suspect must be informed of his/her Miranda rights before an in-custody interrogation
B. The suspect must knowingly and intelligently waive his rights
C. Miranda rights can be waived, but only in writing
D. Both A and B are correct

Question 15 - EXAM2

A

D. Both A and B are correct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The “Fruit of the Poisonous Tree” doctrine refers to the exclusion of:

A. Inculpatory evidence
B. Exculpatory evidence
C. Legally obtained evidence
D. Evidence discovered as a result of a constitutional violation

Question 16 - EXAM2

A

D. Evidence discovered as a result of a constitutional violation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

This exception to the “Fruit of the Poisonous Tree” doctrine is NOT recognized in Idaho state courts:

A. Independent Source
B. Inevitable Discovery
C. Good Faith
D. None of the above are recognized

Question 17 - EXAM 2

A

C. Good Faith

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Chimel v. California introduced this 4th Amendment legal concept:

A. Abandoned Property
B. The vehicle frisk
C. The lunge area
D. Frisks of suspicious persons

Question 18 - EXAM2

A

C. The lunge area

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Weeks v. U.S. introduced this 4th Amendment legal concept:

A. The Exclusionary Rule
B. The Grab Area Rule
C. The Right to Counsel
D. The Good Faith Rule

Question 19 - EXAM2

A

A. The Exclusionary Rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

An officer stops a person on the street that she knows to have been previously involved with drugs. The officer searches the person and pulls a bag of meth out of the person’s right front pocket. The officer:

A. Has violated the person’s 4th amendment rights and the evidence is subject to the exclusionary rule

B. Has acted in good faith, so the exclusionary rule does not apply

C. Has legal grounds to search, so the exclusionary rule does not apply

D. The exclusionary rule does not apply to 4th Amendment violations

Question 20 - EXAM2

A

A. Has violated the person’s 4th amendment rights and the evidence is subject to the exclusionary rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Which of the following scenarios qualifies as a “Plain View” exception to the search warrant requirement?

A. Officer has lawful access to the location where the meth pipe is seen, because the homeowner invited the officer into the living room

B. Officer has lawful right of access to the gun safe listed on a valid search warrant, but inside the safe is a drug ledger

C. Officer has a search warrant to look for imitation Rolex watches, but right next to the boxes of Rolex watches are Coach handbags. It is immediately apparent the Coach handbags may be imitations as well, so the officer seizes these boxes as well

D. All of the above qualify as “Plain View”

Question 21 - EXAM2

A

D. All of the above qualify as “Plain View”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

The general punishment for a felony, unless otherwise stated in the specific statute, is a maximum punishment of:
A. Five years in the state prison and/or fine of $50,000
B. One year in the county jail and/or fine of $5,000
C. Five years in the county jail and/or fine of $50,000
D. Ten years in the state prison and/or fine of $50,000

Question 22 - EXAM2

A

A. Five years in the state prison and/or fine of $50,000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Maliciously destroying jointly-owned property becomes a felony when the damages exceed?

A. $250
B. $350
C. $1,000
D. Not “Malicious Injury to Property” because it is jointly owned

Question 23 - EXAM2

24
Q

Fred willfully and unlawfully, by fire, damages an unoccupied dwelling. If proven beyond a reasonable doubt, Fred would be found guilty of:

A. First Degree Arson
B. Second Degree Arson
C. Third Degree Arson
D. Aggravated Arson

Question 24 - EXAM2

A

B. Second Degree Arson

25
**Which of the following scenarios qualifies as committing a Grand Theft Under I.C. 18-2407?** A. Over the course of 4 days, Chuck steals 3 baseball cards worth over $50.00 B. Chuck steals a $35.00 baseball card on Monday, and a $40.00 baseball card on Tuesday C. Every month for a year, Chuck takes $100 from an unknowing supervisor at work D. All of the above are correct ## Footnote Question 25 - EXAM2
C. Every month for a year, Chuck takes $100 from an unknowing supervisor at work
26
**Tired of your neighbor's $140.00 dog constantly barking at night, you kill the dog with poison. You can be charged with:** A. Burglary B. Petit Theft C. Grand Theft D. Second Degree Murder ## Footnote Question 26 - EXAM2
B. Petit Theft
27
**Which of the following scenarios qualifies as committing a Malicious Injury to Property Under I.C. 18-7001?** A. Not paying attention, Steve ran over his neighbor's mailbox B. Dave and Jerry split the cost of the fence between their property, but still cannot get along. In an angry spat, Dave and Jerry tear down the fence C. Upset with her husband, Becky fills their family car's gas tank with sand D. All of the above are correct ## Footnote Question 27 - EXAM2
D. All of the above are correct
28
**Which of the following scenarios qualifies as committing a Malicious Harassment Under I.C. 18-7902?** A. Angry because the Irish bar was closed, Mark maliciously breaks the Irish bar's window B. Pat spray paints the word lesbians on his neighbor's house due to their sexual orientation C. Chris throws a rock injuring Jerry, because Jerry put a Jewish sign in his field D. All of the above are correct ## Footnote Question 28 - EXAM2
D. All of the above are correct
29
**A person has been arrested when she or he has been:** A. Read the Miranda warning B. Frisked C. Stopped by a police officer D. Actual restraint or submitted to custody ## Footnote Question 29 - EXAM2
D. Actual restraint or submitted to custody
30
**What "manner" of arrest is authorized by law?** A. Actual restraint of the person B. Submission by the person C. A and B are correct D. None of the above are correct ## Footnote Question 30 - EXAM2
C. A and B are correct
31
**In Idaho, who is allowed to serve (execute) a warrant?** A. Any peace officer directed in the warrant or certified in Idaho B. Any magistrate or district court judge C. Any county prosecutor D. All of the above are correct ## Footnote Question 31 - EXAM2
D. All of the above are correct
32
** If Ted killed Susan with malice aforethought on April 1, 2019, what would be the statute of limitations?** A. One year from the date of commission B. Five years from the date of commission C. Five years from the date of filing the charge D. There would be no statute of limitations ## Footnote Question 32 - EXAM2
B. Five years from the date of commission
33
**If Wes left the state of Idaho after committing an aggravated battery on August 15, 2019, what would happen to the statute of limitations?** A. The statute is tolled until Wes returns to Idaho B. Nothing it is a felony and the statute of limitations continues to run C. The statute is tolled until Wes proves he is back In Idaho D. None of the above are correct ## Footnote Question 33 - EXAM2
A. The statute is tolled until Wes returns to Idaho
34
** Which of the following is TRUE regarding Idaho State Senators and Representatives in relation to their Constitutional privilege from arrest?** A. They may be cited, but not arrested for a misdemeanor during the legislative session B. They may not be cited, nor arrested for a felony during the legislative session C. They may be arrested when traveling to the legislative session, but not returning from there D. None of the above are correct ## Footnote Question 34 - EXAM2
A. They may be cited, but not arrested for a misdemeanor during the legislative session
35
**Which of the following is TRUE in regards to the statutory privilege from arrest?** A. A witness from another state under a court order to testify in an Idaho court B. A member of the Idaho National Guard while on military leave C. A legislator who has committed treason during the legislative session D. All of the above are correct ## Footnote Question 35 - EXAM2
D. All of the above are correct
36
**A possible consequence to a peace officer for making a false arrest is:** A. All evidence will be suppressed, even if it is not fruit of the poisonous tree B. The officer may be charged with a crime, but has absolute immunity from civil liability C. The officer may be disciplined by his or her employing agency D. Because of qualified immunity, the only possible consequence is a civil lawsuit ## Footnote Question 36 - EXAM2
C. The officer may be disciplined by his or her employing agency
37
**In which of the following scenarios is a Miranda warning required?** A. Moe is handcuffed and being questioned, about a crime, by an officer B. Larry is approached by an officer and asked if he is dealing drugs C. Curly is arrested and immediately begins to confess to the detective D. All of the above are correct ## Footnote Question 37 - EXAM2
A. Moe is handcuffed and being questioned, about a crime, by an officer
38
**Which of the following statements is TRUE regarding the invocation of Miranda rights?** A. An attorney may vicariously assert or invoke the suspect's right to remain silent B. A suspect may invoke her right to silence by conduct as long as it is unambiguous and unequivocal C. Once a suspect initially waives her right to counsel, she cannot later revoke this waiver D. A suspect's difficulty in understanding the language used by the officer does not impact the invocation ## Footnote Question 38 - EXAM2
B. A suspect may invoke her right to silence by conduct as long as it is unambiguous and unequivocal
39
**Evidence is defined as:** A. More likely than not that a suspect has committed a crime B. An out-of-court statement offered for the truth of the matter asserted C. Anything that has a tendency to prove or disprove a fact in a case D. None of the above are correct ## Footnote Question 39 - EXAM2
C. Anything that has a tendency to prove or disprove a fact in a case
40
**What must all evidence be?** A. Relevant B. Competent C. Legally Obtained D. All of the above are correct ## Footnote Question 40 - EXAM2
D. All of the above are correct
41
**What is the duty of law enforcement and prosecutors regarding "exculpatory" evidence?** A. Must provide it to the defense upon request B. Must provide it to the defense regardless of whether it is requested or not C. Not required to provide to the defense as they have the ability to investigate on their own D. There is no such thing as exculpatory evidence ## Footnote Question 41 - EXAM2
B. Must provide it to the defense regardless of whether it is requested or not
42
**Bloodstains, fingerprints and drug paraphernalia are considered what type of evidence?** A. Direct B. Tangible C. Testimonial D. Demonstrative ## Footnote Question 42 - EXAM2
B. Tangible
43
**An expert witness who tells the jury their opinion is considered what type of evidence?** A. Credible B. Tangible C. Testimonial D. Demonstrative ## Footnote Question 43 - EXAM2
C. Testimonial
44
**Applications for search warrants are usually heard in which type of court?** A. Magistrate Court B. District Court C. Court of Appeals D. Idaho Supreme Court ## Footnote Question 44 - EXAM2
A. Magistrate Court
45
**Cases involving felonies after the preliminary hearing or grand jury hearing are heard in which type of court?** A. Magistrate Court B. District Court C. Court of Appeals D. Idaho Supreme Court ## Footnote Question 45 - EXAM2
B. District Court
46
**You arrest a citizen for simple assault and are called upon to testify regarding your investigation. Which type of court will you appear at to testify at trial** ## Footnote Question 46 - EXAM2
B. District Court
47
**Cases involving felonies after the preliminary hearing or grand jury hearing are heard in which type of court?** ## Footnote Question 47- EXAM2
B. District Court
48
**You arrest a citizen for simple assault and are called upon to testify regarding your investigation. Which type of court will you appear at to testify at trial?** ## Footnote Question 48 - EXAM2
C. Magistrate Court
49
**You find methamphetamines when searching the pocket of a citizen and are called upon to testify about in the criminal trial. Which type of court will you appear at to testify at trial?** ## Footnote Question 49 - EXAM2
B. District Court
50
**Which of the following is a difference between a 'jury trial' and a 'bench trial'?** ## Footnote Question 50 - EXAM2
A. In a bench trial the judge determines both the facts and the law
51
**Which of the following statements regarding 'burden of proof' is TRUE?** ## Footnote Question 51 - EXAM2
C. The plaintiff's burden of proof in a civil trial is preponderance of the evidence
52
**The 'burden of proof' at a criminal trial is?** ## Footnote Question 52 - EXAM2
C. Beyond a Reasonable Doubt
53
**As a means for preparing for court, a police officer should do which of the following?** ## Footnote Question 53 - EXAM2
C. Contact the prosecutor prior to testifying regarding any questions or concerns
54
**Which of the following statements regarding the difference between a lay witness versus an expert witness is TRUE?** ## Footnote Question 54 - EXAM2
B. An expert witness may provide an opinion that goes to the ultimate issue to be decided
55
**Which of the following definitions are TRUE?** ## Footnote Question 55 - EXAM2
C. Hearsay is an out-of-court statement offered for the truth of the matter asserted
56
**When testifying in court, if you cannot remember the answer to a question you should:** ## Footnote EXAM2
C. Say, 'I don't remember.'
57
**An officer may encounter this common trial objection when testifying in court:** ## Footnote EXAM2
D. All of the above are common objections