Miligram aim MILGRAM OG
find out whether ordinary americans would obey unjust orders from personalism of authority to inflict pain on another person
Miligram participants MILGRAM OG
-male volunteers
-local newspaper
-‘punishment and learning’ study
Method- greeted MILGRAM OG
-greeted by experimenter and introduced to another confederate they thought was a participant
-experimented explained one participant was to be teacher and other learner
-real participant was always teacher
-role to teach learner word pairs and test recall
Method role MILGRAM OG
-participnt told their role was to teach learner word pairs and test recall
-administer shocks every time learner mistake and increase voltage
-shown electric chair
-sample shock to convince real
Method shocks MILGRAM OG
-as shocks higher learners screams became more dramatic
-180 volts complained weak heart
-300 volts demanded leave
-315 refused answer and stayed silent
-experiment continued u til refusal or 450 volts reached
What happened if participant objected? MILGRAM OG
told
-please continue
-you must go on
Results MILGRAM OG
-100% of participants went to at least 300 volts
-65% administered full 450 volts
-signs of extreme tension
Conclusion MILGRAM OF
-under certain circumstances most people will obey orders even if involve inflicting pain
Limitation ethical MILGRAM OG
-ethical issues
-deceived
-lack informed consent
-no protection from harm
-could outweigh findings
Strength research support MILGRAM OG
-findings recreated in french h documentary made about reality tv
-participants in game show paid to give (fake) electric shocks to actors in front of audience
-80% delivered maximum shock to apparently unconscious man
-support findings about obedience to authority
Limitation low internal validity MILGRAM OG
-may not have been testing ehat he intended to test
-Gina Perry examined tapes and reported only half beloved shocks real
-may be responding demand characteristics
situational variables affecting obedience
uniform
location
proximity
authority
uniform
-research suggests we are more likely to obey person in uniform in comparison to someone with no uniform
location
legitimacy of location
have to believe genuine setting
proximity
closer we are to consequences of our actions the less likely we are to obey as we can see impact
milgram variation uniform
higher levels obedience when experimented wearing white lab coat than when replaced by civilian
milgram variation location
random rundown building in connecticut less than 50% administered full 450 volts
milgram variation proximity
teacher and learner in same room 40% administered full 450 volts
Bickman (1974)
-investigate power of uniform
-makes actors dressed as milkman, security guard, ordinary clothes
-each asked members of public to follow instructions; pick up bag, give someone money for parking metre, stand on other side bus stop sign
-obedience highest in response to actor in guard uniform
What is Bickman a strength of
-research support for influence of situational factors
situation attribution
-assigning cause of behaviour to some situation outside persons control
-external factors
dispositional
-assigns cause of behaviour to some internal chafracteristic such as personality
psychological factors affecting obedience
-agentic state
-autonomous state
agentic state
-when individual carries out orders of authority figure and acts as agent
-little personal responsiblity