psych final exam #2 Flashcards

(27 cards)

0
Q

Attribution Theory

A

If someone does something weird, have to attribute a cause to their behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Social psychology

A

the study of how we think about, influence, and relate to one another
Changes things we do
SOCIAL NORM: unwritten rule that we all live by. Embedded in you, dictates how we act, they are cultural based (why foreigners screw them up)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Fundamental attribution error

A

Does something weird, attribute it to personality, instead of situation. (Bad cuz people’s behavior changes based on situation)
Out group:blame personality
In group: “or clique”give them the benefit of the doubt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Implicit personality theory

A

Certain behaviors go together. Ex) all strippers have daddy issues
Halo effect: look at beautiful person, tend to think the smart
Horns effect: see good looking guy, bet he knows he is hot

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Actions affect

A

Attitudes and vice versus.

Attitude:belief and feeling that predisposes one to respond in a particular way to objects, people, and events

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Cognitive dissonance

A

Yucky feeling you get when attitudes and behavior are not consistent
-motivated to reduce yucky feeling and return to homeostasis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Conformity vs obedience vs compliance

A

Conformity: yielding to perceived or real group pressure by copying the behavior and beliefs of others. Do something cuz everyone else is doing it

Obedience: order to change behavior and do it

Compliance: request to change behavior and do it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Heuristics

A

Rule of thumb
Most decisions are this
Routines

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Ways to reduce cognitive dissonance

A

Change behavior
Justify behavior by changing attitude
Justify behavior by adding new cognition (rationalization: use pseudo logic, trivialization: now I smoke less)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Groups working together

A

Social facilitation:tend to do activity faster and better, competitive. Backfires if a difficult task, makes task harder

Social loafing: slack off

Deundividualization: mob mentality, feel anonymous

Group polarization: when the attitudes of group members become more extreme just by the group members talking about it

Groupthink – thinking of the group as our identity, which causes us to avoid advice opposite our goal, rationalize any behavior in an attempt to preserve the group and its goals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

2main types of compliance

A

External: comply with request despite privately disagreeing
Internal: comply with request bcuz agree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Factors tht foster compliance

A
  • positive mood
  • reciprocity. problems? Favor can be uninvited and still owe them. Doesn’t matter if favor is even, still owe them
  • giving reasons: heuristic- if someone asks for something and gives a reason you get what you want
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Compliance strategies

A

Foot in the door – person secures compliance with small request and then follows it up later with larger less desirable request

  • Door in the face – offers something undesirable, then follows it up with a more reasonable request
  • That’s Not All – makes request but then immediately offers a discount bonus that makes the request more reasonable
  • Low-balling – understating true cost until the agreement is secured
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Psychodynamic perspective

A

Frauds. included the unconscious mind, psychosexual stages, and defense mechanisms
Dealt with anxiety disorders. Came from dealing with something suppressed.
Free association: talking therapy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Frauds Iceberg analogy

A

Conscious, preconscious, unconscious
Id
Ego
Superego

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Projectile tests

A

Let you project what is going on in your unconscious onto so,etching else
Rorschach blot test seeks to identify personalit
Normal people misdiagnosed, lacks validation

16
Q

Frauds defense mechanisms!!!

A
Whenever cognitively (ego) was under attack, attempt to ward off information you can't wrap your mind around
Techniques used to deal with information you don't want to hear
-denial
-repression
-regression
-reaction formation
-projection 
-rationalization
-displacement 
-sublimation
17
Q

Denial

A
  • refusal to accept external reality (confirmation bias).
  • If can’t resolve info, deny it’s even there (anorexia)
  • can’t admit something is wrong with them
18
Q

Repression

A
  • banishes memory from conscious

- when something embarrassing happens try and forget about it

19
Q

Regression

A
  • retract back to an earlier time
  • earlier behavior
  • Freud thought retreated to infantile psychosexual stage
20
Q

Reaction formation

A

-Info causes ego to switch
-put unacceptable impulses into opposites
For example, person denying he is gay and thinks gay is wrong
-becomes homophobic
-could bcome ladies man

21
Q

Projection

A

-project crap onto other people
-think other person is having the feelings I myself am actually having
Ex) professor hates me, but in reality I hate me

22
Q

Rationalization

A

Pseudological

Self justifying behavior (cognitive dissonance, try to resolve yucky feeling)

23
Q

Displacement

A

Shift impulse towards more acceptable object. Place anger on wrong person
NEGATIVE
Angry but can’t punch boss, so kick dog

24
Sublimation
Refocusing negative energy on something positive | -angry, write poetry or workout at gym
25
Cognitive errors that occur with depression
Lack of serotonin so think differently - overgeneralization: draw conclusion about self worth from single fact - selective abstraction: focus on small detail, ignore big picture - personalization: incorrectly take responsibility for negative event (can b in the world) - magnification and minimization : min positive, max neg - arbitrary inference: draw conclusion in absence of evidence - dichotomous thinking: black and white thinking (either good or bad person)
26
Biological basis for schizophrenia
Too much dopamine, purely biological | Results in a loss of touch with reality